Qualified Safety Management Ensures Sustainable Human Life Quality

  • Dana Procházková
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 413)


The quality of both, the safety management and the ways of realisation of management tasks, are fundamental importance for ensuring the human security and sustainable development. The capability of correct application of risk management process is important. For assembling the qualified data for the FOCUS, the EU project, it was proposed the tool that leans on method of application of case study at decision-making. The tool has four main parts and it acts for obtaining the qualified groundwork for territory safety management and it can be easy adapted for needs of objects, partial safeties as it is the labour safety and health, and organisations. The paper shows aims of individual steps and linking the partial tools from management domain.


safety management FOCUS sustainability security 


  1. 1.
    UN: Human Development Report. New York (1994),
  2. 2.
    Raven, P.H., Berg, L.R., Johnson, G.B.: Environment. Saunders College Pub. (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Procházková, D.: Strategic Management of Safety of Territory and Organisation. ČVUT, Praha (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    EU: European Commission Adopts Communication on Precautionary Principle. Brussels (2000), http://europa. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. US Project Management Institute, Washington (2004) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Procházková, D.: Risk Analysis and Risk Management. ČVUT, Praha (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    OECD: Assessing Societal Risks and Vulnerabilities. OECD Studies in Risk Management, Denmark, Paris (2006) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    EU: Risk Assessment and Mapping Guidelines for Disaster Management. Working paper SEC(2010) 1626. Brussels (2010). Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ISO: Draft International Standard ISO/DIS 31000, Risk management – Principles and guidelines on implementation (2008) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    US ISDR: World Conference on Disaster Reduction Declaration. Kobe (2005),
  11. 11.
    Procházková, D.: Methodology for Estimation of Costs for Renovation of Property in Territories Affected by Natural or Other Disaster. SPBI SPEKTRUM XI Ostrava (2007) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    FEMA: Guide for All-Hazard Emergency Operations Planning. State and Local Guide (SLG) 101. FEMA, Washinton (1996) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    OECD: Guidance on Safety Performance Indicators. Guidance for Industry, Public Authorities and Communities for developing SPI Programmes related to Chemical Accident Prevention, Preparedness and Response. OECD, Paris (2002) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Disaster Advisors Inc.: Bussiness Continuity Planning (2003),
  15. 15.
    Procházková, D.: Real Problems of Critical Infrastructure Threatening the Region safety. In: Ale, Papazoglou, Zio (eds.) Reliability, Risk and Safety, pp. 2387–2394. Taylor & Francis Group, London (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Procházková, D.: Critical Infrastructure Safety. ČVUT, Praha (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bossel, H.: Systeme, Dynamik, Simulation – Modellbildung, Analyse und Simulation komplexer Systeme. Books on Demand, Norderstedt/Germany (2004),
  18. 18.
    Maslow, A.H.: Motivation and Personality. Haper, New York (1954)Google Scholar
  19. 19.

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dana Procházková
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Transportation SciencesCzech Technical University in PraguePrague 1Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations