Abstract
The quality of both, the safety management and the ways of realisation of management tasks, are fundamental importance for ensuring the human security and sustainable development. The capability of correct application of risk management process is important. For assembling the qualified data for the FOCUS, the EU project, it was proposed the tool that leans on method of application of case study at decision-making. The tool has four main parts and it acts for obtaining the qualified groundwork for territory safety management and it can be easy adapted for needs of objects, partial safeties as it is the labour safety and health, and organisations. The paper shows aims of individual steps and linking the partial tools from management domain.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
UN: Human Development Report. New York (1994), http://www.un.org
Raven, P.H., Berg, L.R., Johnson, G.B.: Environment. Saunders College Pub. (1998)
Procházková, D.: Strategic Management of Safety of Territory and Organisation. ČVUT, Praha (2011)
EU: European Commission Adopts Communication on Precautionary Principle. Brussels (2000), http://europa. eu.int/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/00/96&format=ML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. US Project Management Institute, Washington (2004)
Procházková, D.: Risk Analysis and Risk Management. ČVUT, Praha (2011)
OECD: Assessing Societal Risks and Vulnerabilities. OECD Studies in Risk Management, Denmark, Paris (2006)
EU: Risk Assessment and Mapping Guidelines for Disaster Management. Working paper SEC(2010) 1626. Brussels (2010).
ISO: Draft International Standard ISO/DIS 31000, Risk management – Principles and guidelines on implementation (2008)
US ISDR: World Conference on Disaster Reduction Declaration. Kobe (2005), www.un.org
Procházková, D.: Methodology for Estimation of Costs for Renovation of Property in Territories Affected by Natural or Other Disaster. SPBI SPEKTRUM XI Ostrava (2007)
FEMA: Guide for All-Hazard Emergency Operations Planning. State and Local Guide (SLG) 101. FEMA, Washinton (1996)
OECD: Guidance on Safety Performance Indicators. Guidance for Industry, Public Authorities and Communities for developing SPI Programmes related to Chemical Accident Prevention, Preparedness and Response. OECD, Paris (2002)
Disaster Advisors Inc.: Bussiness Continuity Planning (2003), http://www.disasteradvisors.com/disasterplanning.htm
Procházková, D.: Real Problems of Critical Infrastructure Threatening the Region safety. In: Ale, Papazoglou, Zio (eds.) Reliability, Risk and Safety, pp. 2387–2394. Taylor & Francis Group, London (2010)
Procházková, D.: Critical Infrastructure Safety. ČVUT, Praha (2012)
Bossel, H.: Systeme, Dynamik, Simulation – Modellbildung, Analyse und Simulation komplexer Systeme. Books on Demand, Norderstedt/Germany (2004), http://www.libri.de
Maslow, A.H.: Motivation and Personality. Haper, New York (1954)
EU: FOCUS, http://www.focusproject.eu
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Procházková, D. (2013). Qualified Safety Management Ensures Sustainable Human Life Quality. In: Hřebíček, J., Schimak, G., Kubásek, M., Rizzoli, A.E. (eds) Environmental Software Systems. Fostering Information Sharing. ISESS 2013. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 413. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41151-9_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41151-9_44
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41150-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41151-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)