Skip to main content

Konflikte in Organisationen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

Zusammenfassung

Soziale Konflikte bezeichnen das Erleben einer Unvereinbarkeit der Überzeugungen oder Interessen mindestens zweier Parteien und sämtliche Aktivitäten der Parteien, die sich aus der erlebten Unvereinbarkeit ergeben. Deskriptive Ansätze der Konfliktforschung versuchen, die Erscheinungsformen sozialer Konflikte systematisierend zu beschreiben. So kann beispielsweise mit Blick auf das Konfliktthema zwischen Aufgaben- und Beziehungskonflikten unterschieden werden. Erklärende Ansätze beschreiben den Zusammenhang zwischen Entstehungs- und Verlaufsbedingungen, Konfliktverhalten und Auswirkungen desselben. So postuliert das Dual-Concern-Modell, dass das Verhalten im Kontext sozialer Konflikte durch zwei Motive bestimmt werde: Selbstbehauptungsmotiv sowie Unterstützungs- oder Kooperationsmotiv. Präskriptive Ansätze formulieren Handlungsempfehlungen zur Konfliktvermeidung und -beilegung. Auf dieser präskriptiven Ebene lassen sich z. B. integrative und distributive Verhandlungstechniken erörtern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. A. (2008). Judgement in managerial decision making (7. Aufl.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self‐esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self‐love or self‐hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 219–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta‐analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeChurch, L. A., Hamilton, K. L., & Haas, C. (2007). Effects of conflict management strategies on perceptions of intragroup conflict. Group Dynamics, 11, 66–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. (2011). Conflict at work: Basic principles and applied issues. In S. Zedeck (Hrsg.), APA Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization, (Bd. 3, S. 461–493). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K., & Gelfand, M. J. (2008). Conflict in the workplace: Sources, functions, and dynamics across multiple levels of analysis. In C. K.De Dreu, & M. J. Gelfand (Hrsg.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations (S. 3–54). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K., Beersma, B., Steinel, W., & van Kleef, G. A. (2007). The psychology of negotiation: Principles and basic processes. In A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Hrsg.), Handbook of basic principles in social psychology (S. 608–629). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K., Evers, A., Beersma, B., Kluwer, E. S., & Nauta, A. (2001). A theory‐based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 645–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (2006a). Cooperation and competition. In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, & E. C. Marcus (Hrsg.), The handbook of conflict resolution (2. Aufl. S. 23–42). San Francisco, CA: Wiley/Jossey‐Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (2006b). Justice and conflict. In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, & E. C. Marcus (Hrsg.), The handbook of conflict resolution (2. Aufl. S. 43–68). San Francisco, CA: Wiley/Jossey‐Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Wit, F. R. C., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 360–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, M. T. M., De Dreu, C. K. W., Evers, A., & van Dierendonck, D. (2009). Passive responses to interpersonal conflict at work amplify employee strain. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 18, 405‐423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, M. T. M., van Dierendonck, D., Evers, A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2005). Conflict and well‐being at work: The moderating role of personality. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, A. D., & Mussweiler, T. (2001). First offers as anchors: The role of perspective‐taking and negotiator focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 657–669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glasl, F. (1999). Konfliktmanagement. Ein Handbuch für Führungskräfte, Beraterinnen und Berater (6. Aufl.). Bern: Haupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilty, J. A., & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Black‐hat/white‐hat strategy in bilateral negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 444–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüffmeier, J., & Hertel, G. (2012). Erfolgreich verhandeln: Das integrative Phasenmodell der Verhandlungsführung. Psychologische Rundschau, 63, 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, D. (2008). Conflict at work throughout the history of organizations. In C. K.De Dreu, & M. J. Gelfand (Hrsg.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations (S. 55–77). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict‐outcome relationship. In R. M. Kramer, & B. M. Staw (Hrsg.), Research in organizational behavior (Bd. 25, S. 187–242). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E., Blank, A., & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of placebic information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 635–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Jackson, C. L., Mathieu, J. E., & Saul, J. R. (2008). A meta‐analysis of team work processes: Toward a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61, 273–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lickel, B., Miller, N., Stenstrom, D. M., Denson, T. F., & Schmader, T. (2006). Vicarious retribution: The role of collective blame in intergroup aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 372–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martinko, M. J., Douglas, S. C., & Harvey, P. (2006). Attribution theory in industrial and organizational psychology: A review. In G. P. Hodgkinson, & J. K. Ford (Hrsg.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Bd. 21, S. 127–187). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., & Kals, E. (2007). Mediation. Lehrbuch für Psychologen und Juristen (2. Aufl.). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauta, A., & Kluwer, E. S. (2004). The use of questionnaires in conflict research. International Negotiation, 9, 457–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie, J. R., & Kidder, D. L. (2008). What about negotiator styles? The. International Journal of Conflict Management, 19, 132–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkley, R. L. (1990). Dimensions of conflict: Disputant interpretations of conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkley, R. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1994). Conflict frames of reference: Implications for dispute processes and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D. G. (2008). Conflict escalation in organizations. In C. K. W.De Dreu, & M. J. Gelfand (Hrsg.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations (S. 245–266). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raver, J. L., & Barling, J. (2008). Workplace aggression and conflict: Constructs, commonalities, and challenges for future inquiry. In C. K.De Dreu, & M. J. Gelfand (Hrsg.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations (S. 211–244). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. Z., Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. H. (1994). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement (2. Aufl.). New York: McGraw‐Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttinger, B., & Sauer, J. (2000). Konflikt und Konflikt lösen. Kritische Situationen erkennen und bewältigen (3. Aufl.). Leonberg: Rosenberger Fachverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., & BrukLee, V. (2008). Conflict, health, and well‐being. In C. K.De Dreu, & M. J. Gelfand (Hrsg.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations (S. 267–289). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self‐report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organizational Constraint Scales, Quantitative Workload Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 356–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., Chen, P. Y., & O’Connell, B. J. (2000). A longitudinal study of relations between job stressors and job strains while controlling for prior negative affectivity and strains. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 211–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spieß, E. (2004). Kooperation und Konflikt. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Organisationspsychologie 1: Gruppe und Organisation. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie (Bd. D/III/4, S. 193–250). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenstrom, D. M., Lickel, B., Denson, T. F., & Miller, N. (2008). The roles of in‐group identification and out‐group entitativity in intergroup retribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1570–1582.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. L. (Hrsg.). (2006). Negotiation theory and research. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. L. (2009). The mind and the heart of the negotiator (4. Aufl.). Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. (1998). Cooperative and competitive goal approach to conflict: Accomplishments and challenges. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47, 285–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, C. J., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). A decision‐making perspective to negotiation: A review of the past and a look to the future. Negotiation Journal, 25(4), 467–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Complex interpersonal conflict behaviour: Theoretical frontiers. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vliert, E. (1998). Conflict and conflict management. In P. J. D. Drenth, H. Thierry, & C. J.de Wolff (Hrsg.), Handbook of work and organizational psychology 2. Aufl. Personnel psychology, (Bd. 3, S. 351–376). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vliert, E., & Janssen, O. (2001). Description, explanation, and prescription of intragroup conflict behaviors. In M. E. Turner (Hrsg.), Groups at work: Theory and research (S. 267–297). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vliert, E., Nauta, A., Giebels, E., & Janssen, O. (1999). Constructive conflict at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 475–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Beavin, I. H., & Jackson, D. D. (2011). Menschliche Kommunikation: Formen, Störungen, Paradoxien (12. Aufl.). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Solga, M. (2014). Konflikte in Organisationen. In: Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41130-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41130-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41129-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41130-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics