Skip to main content

Economic Returns to Schooling in Urban China: Ordinary Least Squares the Instrumental Variables Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1209 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Economics ((BRIEFSECONOMICS))

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the economic returns to schooling in urban China by using ordinary least squares (OLS) and instrumental variables (IV) methodologies. First, we find that OLS estimates of the returns to education are lower in China than in other transition economies, whereas IV estimates are higher in China. Second, we find that OLS, a method for estimating the returns to education without controlling for endogeneity bias, may underestimate the true rates of return for men. In addition, if we do not control for the endogeneity and sample selection biases, we may further underestimate the true rates of return for women. Finally, we find that OLS estimates of the returns to education for men are slightly higher than those for women. The IV estimates for women are higher than those for men, and this difference increases after correcting for selectivity biases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Heckman (2003) suggests that China invests much more on physical capital than human capital because of the difference in the returns to human and physical capital.

  2. 2.

    The following papers present estimates of the rates of returns to schooling in China using different data sets. These papers also examine previous studies on the returns to education in China. For example, one of the first-class studies examining prior studies is Zhang et al. (2005).

  3. 3.

    When we pool the 2004 and 2006 CHNS data, we cannot just pool the wage data for the 2 years to form the sample, because the nominal wages across the 2 years are not compatible in the estimation, and part of the wage differential may be simply the result of the different values across the years. In order to overcome this problem, we convert the 2003 wage data of each province into the 2005 wage data in the same province, considering the price increase (or decrease) of the province. More concretely, we adjust the 2005 wages in region i as \( w_{2005}^{i} = w_{2003}^{i} \times {{(p_{2005}^{i} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{(p_{2005}^{i} } {p_{2003}^{i} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {p_{2003}^{i} }}) \), where \( w_{t}^{i} \) denotes the wage at time t (t = 2003 or 2005) in province i and \( p_{t}^{i} \) the price level at time i (t = 2003 or 2005) in provincei.

  4. 4.

    Source China State Statistical Bureau and China Ministry of Labour and Social Security (2006) China Labour Statistical Yearbook.

  5. 5.

    Our data cover 1,549 married females, of whom 534 are “nonparticipating” (doing housework) and 1,015 are “participating”. The CHNS questionnaire contains the following questions on work status: (1) Are you working presently? a. No; b. Yes. (2) Why are you not working? a. Seeking work; b. Doing housework; c. Disabled; d. Student; e. Retired; f. Other. For married women who choose “a. Seeking work” in the second question, we consider the decision on nonparticipation to probably be due to demand-side restrictions. For married women who choose “b. Doing housework” in the second question, we consider the decision on nonparticipation to be related to self-selection.

  6. 6.

    Share is the share of household members who are younger than 7 years or older than 65 years.

  7. 7.

    Heckman (1990) suggests that a variable excluded from the wages equation be included as a continuous variable in the participation equation. Zhang et al. (2005) use the shares of household members who are younger than 7 years, between 7 and 15 years, or older than 60 years as identifying variables.

  8. 8.

    Most existing studies in the literature use annual wages instead of hourly wages. This leads to a bias in the estimates. When we use annual wages to estimate the rate of returns to schooling in this paper, we find that the rates of returns for men and women are 7.11% and 6.88%, respectively. These rates are lower than those obtained on the basis of hourly wages and are consistent with Li (2003).

  9. 9.

    Following Halvorsen and Palmquist (1980), we compute these estimates using the following formula: \( (Exp(\beta ) - 1) \times 100 \).

  10. 10.

    Following Wooldridge (2002), we treat all the variables except schooling as exogenous, include all exogenous variables in the participation Eq. (8.4), and list all exogenous variables as instruments in estimating Eq. (8.5) using 2SLS.

  11. 11.

    The fact that the significant selectivity term \( \lambda \) is positive (negative) implies that the returns to schooling is underestimated (overestimated) if we do not control for sample selection bias. See Green (2002), Wooldridge (2002), and Arabsheibani and Mussurov (2007).

  12. 12.

    Table 8.6 shows that the selection term is significant in the wage equation but not in the schooling equation. These results are consistent with those of Arabsheibani and Mussurov (2007).

  13. 13.

    The term\( \lambda \) is negative in Arabsheibani and Mussurov (2007). The negative effect, they explain, suggests that on average, nonparticipating women have a comparative advantage over participating women. This, they suggest, may be associated with the rise in Islamic values that keep more women in their homes (even though women, on average, are endowed with characteristics associated with earnings advantages in the workplace).

References

  • Appleton S, Knight J, Song L, Xia X (2002) Towards a competitive labour market? Urban workers, rural migrants, redundancies and hardships in China. Working Paper, Institute for Contemporary China Studies, University of Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Arabsheibani GR, Lau L (1999) Mind the gap: an analysis of gender wage differentials in Russia. Labour 13:761–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arabsheibani GR, Mussurov A (2007) Returns to schooling in Kazakhstan. Econ Transit 15:341–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd E (2000) Women in transition: changes in gender wage differentials in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Ind Labor Relat Rev 54:138–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byron RP, Manaloto EQ (1990) Returns to education in China. Econ Dev Cult Change 38:783–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card D (1999) The causal effect of education on earnings. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds.) Handbook of labor economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, vol 3b, pp 1801–1863

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Feng Y (2000) Determinants of economic growth in China: private enterprises, education, and openness. China Econ Rev 11:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen G (2007) An econometric analysis of wage and education in Northeast China. Rokkodai Ronshu 53:35–47 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • China state statistical bureau, China ministry of labour and social security (2006) China labour statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Das M, Newey WK, Vella F (2003) Nonparametric estimation of sample selection models. Rev Econ Stud 70:33–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demurger S (2001) Infrastructure and economic growth: an explanation for regional disparities in China. J Comp Econ 29:95–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filer RK, Jurajda S, Planovsky J (1999) Education and wages in the Czech and Slovak Republics during transition. Labour Econ 6:581–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher BM, Chen J (1997) The coast–noncoast income gap, productivity, and regional economic policy in China. J Comp Econ 25:220–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher BM, Li H, Li S, Wang X (2005) Sorting, selection, and transformation of return to college education in China. Working Paper Nos. 05–07, Ohio State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher BM, Wang X (2004) Skill differentials, return to schooling, and market segmentation in a transition economy: the case of mainland China. J Dev Econ 73:315–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher BM, Wang X (2005) Returns to schooling in China under planning and reform. J Comp Econ 33:265–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia J, Hernandez PJ, Lopez-Nicolas A (2001) How wide is the gap: an investigation of gender wage differentials using quantile regressions. Empirical Economics 26:149–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorodnichenko Y, Sabirianova K (2005) Returns to schooling in Russia and Ukraine: a semi-parametric approach to cross-country analysis. J Comp Econ 33:324–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green WH (2002) Econometric Analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson B, Li S (2000) Economic transformation and the gender earnings gap in urban China. J Popul Econ 13:305–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen R, Palmquist R (1980) The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Am Econ Rev 70:474–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman JJ (1990) Varieties of selection bias. Am Econ Rev 80:313–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman JJ (2003) China’s investment in human capital. Econ Dev Cult Change 51:795–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman JJ, Li X (2004) Selection bias, comparative advantage and heterogeneous returns to education: evidence from China in 2000. Pac Econ Rev 9:155–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joliffe D, Campos NF (2005) Does market liberalization reduce gender discrimination? econometric evidence from Hungary, 1986–1998. Labour Economics 12:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight J, Song L (1991) The determinants of urban income inequality in China. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 53:123–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight J, Song L (1993) Why urban wages differ in China. In: Griffin KB, Zhao R (eds.) The distribution of income in China. St Martin Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight J, Song L (1995) Toward a labor market in China. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 11:97–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight J, Song L (2003) Increasing wage inequality in China: extent, elements and evaluation. Econ Transit 4:597–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai D (2001) Jiao Yu Yu Shou Ru Fen Pei (Education and Earning Distribution). Beijing Normal University Press, Beijing, pp 172–242 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang K (1993) Ability bias, discount rate bias and the return to education. Mimeo, Boston University

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H (2003) Economic transition and returns to education in China. Econ Educ Rev 22:317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Luo Y (2004) Reporting errors, ability heterogeneity, and returns to schooling in China. Pac Econ Rev 9:191–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z (1998) Earnings, education and economic reforms in urban China. Econ Dev Cult Change 46:697–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer-Fazio M (1999) Earnings and education in China’s transition to a market economy survey evidence from 1989 and 1992. China Econ Rev 10:17–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng X, Kidd MP (1997) Labor market reform and the changing structure of wage determination in China’s state sector during the 1980s. J Comp Econ 25:403–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mincer J (1974) Schooling, experience and earnings. NBER, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Münich D, Svejnar J, Terrell K (2005) Is women’s human capital valued more by markets than by planners? J Comp Econ 33:278–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastore F, Verashchagina A (2006) Private returns to human capital: a case study of Belarus. Econ Educ Rev 25:91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pencavel J (1998) Assortative mating by schooling and the work behavior of wives and husbands. Am Econ Rev 88:326–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos G (1994) Returns to investment in education: a global update. World Dev 22:1325–1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos G, Harry AP (2002) Returns to investment in education: a further update. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2881

    Google Scholar 

  • Trostel P, Walker I, Woolley P (2002) Estimates of the economic return to schooling for 28 countries. Labour Econ 9:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang DT (2005) Determinants of schooling returns during transition: evidence from Chinese cities. J Comp Econ 33:244–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Zhao Y (2002) Economic returns to schooling in urban China, 1988–1999. Paper presented at the 2002 meetings of the Allied Social Sciences Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Zhao Y, Albert P, Song X (2005) Economic returns to schooling in urban China, 1988 to 2001. J Comp Econ 33:730–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y (1997) Labor migration and returns to rural education in China. Am J Agric Econ 79:1278–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao W, Zhou X (2001) Institutional transformation and returns to education in Urban China: an empirical assessment. Mimeo, Duke University

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guifu Chen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, G., Hamori, S. (2014). Economic Returns to Schooling in Urban China: Ordinary Least Squares the Instrumental Variables Approach. In: Rural Labor Migration, Discrimination, and the New Dual Labor Market in China. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41109-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41109-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41108-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41109-0

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics