A Survey of Cervix Segmentation Methods in Magnetic Resonance Images
Radiotherapy is an effective therapy in the treatment of cervix cancer. However tumor and normal tissue motion and shape deformation of the cervix, the bladder and the rectum over the course of the treatment can limit the efficacy of radiotherapy and safe delivery of the dose. A number of studies have presented the potential benefits of adaptive radiotherapy for cervix cancer with high soft tissue contrast magnetic resonance images. To enable practical implementation of adaptive radiotherapy for the cervix, computer aided segmentation is necessary. Accurate computer aided automatic or semi-automatic segmentation of the cervix is a challenging task due to inter patient shape variation, soft tissue deformation, organ motion, and anatomical changes during the course of the treatment. This article reviews the methods developed for cervix segmentation in magnetic resonance images. The objective of this work is to present different methods for cervix segmentation in the literature highlighting their similarities, differences, strengths and weaknesses.
KeywordsCervix segmentation methods registration statistical shape models magnetic resonance imaging
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Cervical Cancer Statistics (2013), http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/types/cervical (accessed on June 1, 2013)
- 2.Berendsen, F.F., van der Heide, U.A., Langerak, T.R., Kotte, A.N., Pluim, J.P.: Free-form image registration regularized by a statistical shape model: application to organ segmentation in cervical MR. Computer Vision and Image Understanding (2013)Google Scholar
- 3.Bondar, L., Hoogeman, M., Mens, J.W., Dhawtal, G., de Pree, I., Ahmad, R., Quint, S., Heijmen, B.: Towards an individualized target motion management for IMRT of cervical cancer based on model-predicted cervix-uterus shape and position. Radiotherapy and Oncology 99, 240–245 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Chan, P., Dinniwell, R., Haider, M.A., Cho, Y.B., Jaffray, D., Lockwood, G., Levin, W., Manchul, L., Fyles, A., Milosevic, M.: Inter- and intrafractional tumor and organ movement in patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A cinematic-MRI point-of-interest study. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 70, 1507–1515 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Dowling, J., Lambert, J., Parker, J., Salvado, O., Fripp, J., Wratten, C., Capp, A., Denham, J., Greer, P.: An atlas-based electron density mapping method for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-alone treatment planning and adaptive MRI-based prostate radiation therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 83, e5–e11 (2012)Google Scholar
- 10.Lim, K., Kelly, V., Stewart, J., Xie, J., Cho, Y.B., Moseley, J.B., Brock, K., Fyles, A., Lundin, A., Rehbinder, H., Milosevic, M.: Pelvic radiotherapy for cancer of the cervix: Is what you plan actually what you deliver? International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 74, 304–312 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Viswanathan, A., Dimopoulos, J., Kirisits, C., Berger, D., Potter, R.: Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-based contouring in cervical cancer brachytherapy: results of a prospective trial and preliminary guidelines for standardized contours. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 68, 491–498 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar