Skip to main content

The Strength of Negative Opinions

  • Conference paper
Engineering Applications of Neural Networks (EANN 2013)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 384))

Abstract

We investigate signed social networks, in which users are connected via directional signed links indicating their opinions on each other. Predicting the sign of such links is a crucial task for many real world applications like recommendation systems. Based on the premise that like-minded users tend to influence each other more than others, we present a logistic regression classifier built on evidence drawn from the users’ ego-networks. The main focus of this work is to examine and compare the relative strength of positive and negative opinions investigating to what extent each type of link affects the overall prediction accuracy. We evaluate our approach through a thorough experimental study that comprises three large-scale real-world datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamic, L.A., Adar, E.: Friends and neighbors on the web. Social Networks 25(3), 211–230 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boucher, J., Osgood, C.E.: The pollyanna hypothesis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8(1), 1–8 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cartwright, D., Harary, F.: Structural balance: a generalization of Heider’s theory. Psychological Review 63(5), 277–293 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. DuBois, T., Golbeck, J., Srinivasan, A.: Predicting trust and distrust in social networks. In: SocialCom/PASSAT, pp. 418–424. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fawcett, T.: An introduction to roc analysis. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 27(8), 861–874 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Garcia, D., Garas, A., Schweitzer, F.: Positive words carry less information than negative words. CoRR, abs/1110.4123 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guha, R., Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., Tomkins, A.: Propagation of trust and distrust. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2004, pp. 403–412. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heider, F.: Attitudes and Cognitive Organization. Journal of Psychology 21, 107–112 (1946)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kunegis, J., Lommatzsch, A., Bauckhage, C.: The slashdot zoo: mining a social network with negative edges. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2009, pp. 741–750. ACM, New York (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Leskovec, J., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J.: Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2010, pp. 641–650. ACM, New York (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Leskovec, J., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J.: Signed networks in social media. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2010, pp. 1361–1370. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liben-Nowell, D., Kleinberg, J.: The link prediction problem for social networks. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2003, pp. 556–559. ACM, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Massa, P., Avesani, P.: Controversial users demand local trust metrics: an experimental study on epinions.com community. In: Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 121–126. AAAI Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mishra, A., Bhattacharya, A.: Finding the bias and prestige of nodes in networks based on trust scores. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2011, pp. 567–576. ACM, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Provost, F.: Machine learning from imbalanced data sets 101 (extended abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Salton, G., McGill, M.J.: Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Victor, P., Cornelis, C., De Cock, M., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Practical aggregation operators for gradual trust and distrust. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 184(1), 126–147 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, J., Mani, I.: KNN Approach to Unbalanced Data Distributions: A Case Study Involving Information Extraction. In: Proceedings of the ICML 2003 Workshop on Learning from Imbalanced Datasets (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ziegler, C.-N., Golbeck, J.: Investigating interactions of trust and interest similarity. Decis. Support Syst. 43(2), 460–475 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Papaoikonomou, T., Kardara, M., Tserpes, K., Varvarigou, T. (2013). The Strength of Negative Opinions. In: Iliadis, L., Papadopoulos, H., Jayne, C. (eds) Engineering Applications of Neural Networks. EANN 2013. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 384. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41016-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41016-1_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41015-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41016-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics