Abstract
The proliferation of controls over drugs and drug users in countries around the world over the last century has in part been a result of poor understanding of the substances themselves and/or those that use them. A common thread running through the development of such controls is recourse to images and beliefs about the substances that are exaggerated and often false. Many of these beliefs—despite a contrary evidence base—continue to prevail in discourses around drugs. Fundamental to this is a continued lack of understanding of how risks and harms manifest and a tendency to generalize such experiences as an inevitable outcome of drug use. Drugs, their use, and the outcomes of that use, are not pharmacologically determined, but are situated and contingent. The concept of drug, set and setting (and process) enables us to better understand drug effects and how they can produce different, including non-problem, outcomes, be controlled by both individuals and groups, and have outcomes for societies that are positive as well as negative. Understanding “how” drugs are used and the extent to which they are utilized provides better insight into the real nature of drug use in any one context and counters simple ideas about generic, simple, and inevitable (destructive) outcomes. Failure to meaningfully contextualize risks has resulted in abuses of individual, social, cultural rights and traditions and ecological damage.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aldhous, P. (2006). Drugs, crime and a conservation crisis. New Scientist, 191(2567), 6–8.
Berridge, V. (1998). Opium and the people: Opiate use and policy in 19th and early 20th century Britain, 2nd revised edition. London: Free Association Books.
Beynon, C., Stimson, G., & Lawson, E. (2007). Problematic drug use, ageing and older people: Trends in the age of drug users in northwest England. Ageing and Society, 27(6), 799–810.
Bourgois, P., Prince, B., & Moss, A. (2004). The everyday violence of hepatitis C among young women who inject drugs in San Francisco. Human Organization, 63(3), 253–264.
Brecher, E.M., and the Editors of Consumer Reports (1972). Licit and illicit drugs: The consumers union report on narcotics, stimulants, depressants, inhalants, hallucinogens, and marijuana--including caffeine, nicotine, and alcohol. Boston: Little Brown.
Chagnon, N. (1983). Yanomamo: The last days of Eden. NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Chigwedere, P., Seage, G. R., Gruskin, S., Lee, T. H., & Essex, M. (2008). Estimating the lost benefits of antiretroviral drug use in South Africa. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 49(4), 410–415.
Coomber, R. (Ed.). (1998). The control of drugs and drug users: Reason or reaction? Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Coomber, R. (2006). Pusher myths: Re-situating the drug dealer. London: Free Association Books.
Coomber, R. (2011). Social fear, drug related beliefs, and drug policy. In G. Hunt, M. Milhet, & H. Bergeron (Eds.), Drugs and culture: Knowledge, consumption and policy (pp. 15–32). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
Coomber, R. (2013). How social fear of drugs in the non-sporting world creates a framework for policy in the sporting world. In Anti-doping rational policy or moral panic? [Special issue]. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics.
Coomber, R., & South, N. (Eds.). (2004). Drug use in cultural contexts beyond the West: Tradition, change and post-colonialism. London: Free Association Books.
Coomber, R., & Sutton, C. (2006). How quick to heroin dependence? Drug & Alcohol Review, 25(5), 463–471.
Courtwright, D. T. (1995). The rise and fall and rise of cocaine in the United States. In J. Goodman, P. E. Lovejoy, & A. Sherratt (Eds.), Consuming habits: Drugs in history and anthropology. Chatham, UK: Routledge.
Darke, S., & Zador, D. (1996). Fatal heroin “overdose”: A review. Addiction, 91(12), 1765–1772.
Del Olmo, R. (1987). Aerobiology and the War on Drugs: A transnational crime. Crime and Social Justice, 30, 28–44.
Del Olmo, R. (1998). The ecological impact of illicit drug cultivation and crop eradication programs in Latin America. Theoretical Criminology, 2(2), 269–278.
Dikötter, F., Laamann, L., & Xun, Z. (2004). Narcotic culture: A history of drugs in China. London: Hurst & Company.
European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. (2007). Guidelines for the evaluation of treatment in the field of problem drug use. Lisbon: EMCDDA. Retrieved December 2, 2012 from http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/html.cfm/index50509EN.html.
Feeney, K., & Labate, B. C. (2014). The expansion of Brazilian ayahuasca religions: Law, culture and locality (this volume).
Fitzgerald, J., & Threadgold, T. (2004). Fear of sense in the street heroin market. International Journal of Drug Policy, 15(5), 407–417.
Gfroerer, J., Penne, M., Pemberton, M., & Folsom, R. (2003). Substance abuse treatment need among older adults in 2020: The impact of the aging baby-boom cohort. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 69(2), 127–135.
Habermas, J. (2001). The post-national constellation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hobbs, D. (2013). Lush life: Constructing organized crime in the UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, J. (1985). The hardest drug: Heroin and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kohn, M. (1992). Dope girls: The birth of the British underground. London: Lawrence & Wisehart.
Krivanek, J. (1988). Heroin: Myths and reality. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Labate, B. C., & Jungaberle, H. (Eds.). (2011). The internationalization of ayahuasca. Zurich: Lit Verlag.
Laville, S. (2008, November 11). Cocaine users are destroying the rainforest four square meters a gram. The Guardian, 13.
Lloyd, C. (2010). Sinning and sinned against: The stigmatisation of problem drug use. London: UK Drug Policy Commission. Retrieved December 1, 2012 from http://www.ukdpc.org.uk/resources/Stigma_Expert_Commentary_final2.pdf.
MacRae, E. (2004). The ritual use of ayahuasca by three Brazilian religions. In R. Coomber & N. South (Eds.), Drug use and cultural contexts beyond the West (pp. 27–45). London: Free Association Books.
Mann, C., Ouro-Bang’na, F., & Eledjam, J. J. (2005). Patient-controlled analgesia. Current Drug Targets, 6(7), 815–819.
Molano, A. (1992). Amapola en los Andes Colombianos. Santafe de Bogota, agosto. Unpublished manuscript.
Moore, D. (1993). Beyond Zinberg’s “social setting”: A processural view of illicit drug use. Drug and Alcohol Review, 12(4), 413–421.
Musto, D. F. (1987). The American disease: Origins of narcotic control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nutt, D. J., King, L. A., & Phillips, L. D. (2010). Drug harms in the UK: A multicriteria decision analysis. The Lancet, 376, 1558–1565. doi:10.1016/S0140- 6736(10)61462-6.
Parra, L. E. (1994). La amapola un ano despues de iniciada su erradicacio: Solución posible. Revista Fiesta a la Vida, 2(2). Santafe de Bogota: Direccion Nacional de Estupefacientes, enero.
Police Foundation. (2000). Drugs and the law: Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. London: The Police Foundation.
Reinarman, C., & Levine, H. G. (Eds.). (1997). Crack in America: Demon drugs and social justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Rhodes, T. (2002). The risk environment: A framework for understanding and reducing drug-related harm. International Journal of Drug Policy, 13(2), 85–94.
Rhodes, T. (2009). Risk environments and drug harms: A social science for harm reduction approach. International Journal of Drug Policy, 20, 193–201.
Rivera Cusicanqui, S. (2004). A quasi-legal commodity in the Andes: Coca-leaf consumption in northwestern Argentina. In R. Coomber & N. South (Eds.), Drug use and cultural contexts beyond the West (pp. 64–82). London: Free Association Books.
Rolles, S., & Measham, F. (2011). Questioning the method and utility of ranking drug harms in drug policy. International Journal of Drug Policy, 22(4), 243–246.
Schuerkens, U. (2003). Social transformations between global forces and local life-worlds: Introduction. Current Sociology, 51(3/4), 195–222.
Sentencing Council. (2012). Drug Offences Definitive Guidelines. Retrieved March 20, 2012 from http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/docs/Drug_Offences_Guideline_Professional_Consultation.pdf.
Smith, D. E. (Ed.). (1972). It’s so good, don’t even try it once: Heroin in perspective. New York City, NY: Prentice Hall.
South, N. (1998). A green field for criminology?: A proposal for a perspective. Theoretical Criminology, 2(2), 211–234.
South, N., & Brisman, A. (Eds.). (2012). The international handbook of green criminology. London: Routledge.
Tupper, K. W., & Labate, B. C. (2012). Plants, psychoactive substances, and the INCB: The control of nature and the nature of control. Human Rights and Drugs, 2(1), 17–28.
United Nations General Assembly Special Session. (1998). Political declaration: Guiding principles of drug demand reduction and measures to enhance international cooperation to counter the world drug problem. In Resolutions adopted at United Nations General Assembly Special Session on the World Drug Problem, New York, 8–10 June 1998. Retrieved December 2, 2012 from http://www.unodc.org/pdf/report_1999-01-01_1.pdf.
Williams, C. (Ed.). (1996). Environmental victims: An introduction. Environmental victims (Special issue). Social Justice, 23(4), 1–6.
Woodiwiss, M., & Hobbs, D. (2009). Organised evil and the Atlantic Alliance: Moral panics and the rhetoric of organized crime policing in America and Britain. British Journal of Criminology, 49(1), 106–128.
Zinberg, N. (1984). Drug, set and setting: The basis of controlled intoxicant use. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Zinberg, N. (1985). Drug, set and setting. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coomber, R., South, N. (2014). Fear and Loathing in Drugs Policy: Risk, Rights and Approaches to Drug Policy and Practice. In: Labate, B., Cavnar, C. (eds) Prohibition, Religious Freedom, and Human Rights: Regulating Traditional Drug Use. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40957-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40957-8_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40956-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40957-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)