Skip to main content

Listen to Me! Public Announcements to Agents That Pay Attention — or Not

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8196))

Abstract

In public announcement logic it is assumed that all agents pay attention (listen to/observe) to the announcement. Weaker observational conditions can be modelled in event (action) model logic. In this work, we propose a version of public announcement logic wherein it is encoded in the states of the epistemic model which agents pay attention to the announcement. This logic is called attention-based announcement logic, abbreviated ABAL. We give an axiomatization and prove that complexity of satisfiability is the same as that of public announcement logic, and therefore lower than that of action model logic [2]. We exploit our logic to formalize the concept of joint attention that has been widely discussed in the philosophical and cognitive science literature. Finally, we extend our logic by integrating attention change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aucher, G.: BMS revisited. In: Proc. of 12th TARK, pp. 24–33 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aucher, G., Schwarzentruber, F.: On the complexity of dynamic epistemic logic. In: Proc. of 13th TARK (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balbiani, P., Gasquet, O., Schwarzentruber, F.: Agents that look at one another. Logic Journal of IGPL (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balbiani, P., van Ditmarsch, H., Herzig, A., De Lima, T.: Tableaux for public announcement logic. Journal of Logic and Computation 20(1), 55–76 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Balbiani, P., van Ditmarsch, H., Herzig, A., de Lima, T.: Some truths are best left unsaid. In: Advances in Modal Logic (AiML). College Publications (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baltag, A., Moss, L.S., Solecki, S.: The logic of public announcements, common knowledge, and private suspicions. In: Proc. of 7th TARK, pp. 43–56 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, H.H., Marshall, C.R.: Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In: Elements of Discourse Understanding. Cambridge University Press (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y.: Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 34(1), 39–76 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gerbrandy, J.D.: Bisimulations on Planet Kripke. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, ILLC Dissertation Series DS-1999-01 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y.: A guide to completeness and complexity for modal logics of knowledge and belief. Artificial Intelligence 54, 319–379 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Herzig, A., Lorini, E.: A modal logic of perceptual belief. In: Lihoreau, F., Rebuschi, M. (eds.) Epistemology, Context and Formalism. Synthese Library. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kooi, B., Renne, B.: Arrow update logic. The Review of Symbolic Logic 4(04), 536–559 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lorini, E., Tummolini, L., Herzig, A.: Establishing mutual beliefs by joint attention: towards a formal model of public events. In: Proc. of CogSci, pp. 1325–1330. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Plaza, J.A.: Logics of public communications. In: Proc. of the 4th ISMIS, pp. 201–216. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tommasello, M.: Joint attention as social cognition. In: Moore, C., Dunham, P. (eds.) Joint Attention: its Origins and Role in Development, pp. 103–130. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. van Benthem, J., van Eijck, J., Kooi, B.: Logics of communication and change. Information and Computation 204(11), 1620–1662 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic epistemic logic with assignment. In: Proc. of 4th AAMAS, pp. 141–148. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. van Eijck, J.: Perception and change in update logic. In: van Eijck, J., Verbrugge, R. (eds.) Games, Actions and Social Software 2010. LNCS, vol. 7010, pp. 119–140. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van Ditmarsch, H., Herzig, A., Lorini, E., Schwarzentruber, F. (2013). Listen to Me! Public Announcements to Agents That Pay Attention — or Not. In: Grossi, D., Roy, O., Huang, H. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8196. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40948-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40948-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40947-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40948-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics