Skip to main content

Boolean Games with Epistemic Goals

  • Conference paper
Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (LORI 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8196))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We introduce and formally study games in which the goals of players relate to the epistemic states of players in the game. For example, one player might have a goal that another player knows a certain proposition, while another player might have as a goal that a certain player does not know some proposition. The formal model we use to study epistemic games is a variation of the increasingly popular Boolean games model in which each player controls a number of Boolean variables, but has limited ability to see the truth values of the overall set of formulae that hold in the game. Each player in an epistemic Boolean game has a goal, defined as a formula of modal epistemic logic. Using such a language for goals allows us to explicitly and compactly represent desirable epistemic states. After motivating and formally defining epistemic Boolean games as a concise representation of epistemic Kripke structures, we investigate their complexity and study their properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning About Knowledge. The MIT Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harrenstein, P., van der Hoek, W., Meyer, J.J., Witteveen, C.: Boolean games. In: van Benthem, J. (ed.) Proc. TARK VIII, pp. 287–298 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonzon, E., Lagasquie, M., Lang, J., Zanuttini, B.: Boolean games revisited. In: Proc. ECAI 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dunne, P.E., Kraus, S., van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: Cooperative boolean games. In: Proc. AAMAS 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Endriss, U., Kraus, S., Lang, J., Wooldridge, M.: Designing incentives for boolean games. In: Proc. AAMAS 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. van der Hoek, W., Troquard, N., Wooldridge, M.: Knowledge and control. In: Proc. AAMAS 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: On the logic of cooperation and propositional control. Artiifcial Intelligence 164, 81–119 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. van Eijck, J., Sietsma, F., Wang, Y.: Composing Models. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logic 21(3-4), 397–425 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.A.: Model Checking. MIT Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Papadimitriou, C.H.: Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chalkiadakis, G., Elkind, E., Wooldridge, M.: Computational Aspects of Cooperative Game Theory. Morgan-Claypool (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lomuscio, A.: Knowledge Sharing among Ideal Agents. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ã…gotnes, T., Harrenstein, P., van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: Veri able equi- libria in boolean games. In: Proc. IJCAI 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. van Otterloo, S., van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: Knowledge condition games. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 15, 425–452 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A., Kupferman, O.: Alternating-time temporal logic. Journal of the ACM 49, 672–713 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: Time, knowledge, and cooperation: Alternating-time temporal epistemic logic and its applications. Studia Logica 75, 125–157 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Ågotnes, T., van Ditmarsch, H.: What will they say? – public announcement games. Synthese 179, 57–85 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grant, J., Kraus, S., Wooldridge, M., Zuckerman, I.: Manipulating boolean games through communication. In: Proc. IJCAI 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A.: Reactive modules. Formal Methods in System Design 15, 7–48 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ã…gotnes, T., Harrenstein, P., van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M. (2013). Boolean Games with Epistemic Goals. In: Grossi, D., Roy, O., Huang, H. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8196. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40948-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40948-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40947-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40948-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics