Advertisement

Towards Completeness and Lawfulness of Business Process Models

  • Ludmila Penicina
  • Marite Kirikova
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 158)

Abstract

We address the existing gaps between business process models, enterprise architecture (EA) models and, external regulations that hinder completeness and lawfulness of business process models. As a solution we propose a high-level architecture for business process knowledge management that bridges the identified gaps. We use de-facto industry standards for modelling business processes and EA - BPMN and ArchiMate. We propose to use Bunge-Wand-Weber (BWW) model as a theoretical foundation for storing business process knowledge represented in BPMN and ArchiMate models and storing elements that address lawfulness of the models. BWW model provides a framework for systematically storing internally maintained process knowledge (models) and externally maintained knowledge (regulations), and supporting completeness and lawfulness of the models. Thus, the main contributions of our approach is supporting completeness and lawfulness of business process models and supporting the creation of information services to increase efficiency in the business process modelling context.

Keywords

Business process modelling BPMN ArchiMate BWW 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Grant, R.M.: Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal 17, 109–122 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Silver, B.: BPMN Method and Style with Implementer’s Guide. Cody-Cassidy Press (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    OMG: Business Process Model and Notation 2.0, http://www.bpmn.org
  4. 4.
    Businska, L., Kirikova, M., Penicina, L., Buksa, I., Rudzajs, P.: Enterprise Modeling for Respecting Regulations. PoEM Short Papers 2012. In: Emerging Topics in the Practice of Enterprise Modelling: The 5th IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modelling (PoEM 2012), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 106–118 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    An Official Web Site of the United States Government, http://www.data.gov/
  6. 6.
    Akoma NTOSO: XML for Parliamentary, Legislative and Juridiciary Documents, http://www.akomantoso.org/
  7. 7.
    The Open Group: ArchiMate 2.0 Specification, http://goo.gl/7gC5B
  8. 8.
    Wand, Y., Weber, R.: On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars. Information Systems Journal 3, 217–237 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Recker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Do Process Modelling Techniques Get Better? A Comparative Ontological Analysis of BPMN. In: Campbell, B., Underwood, J., Bunker, D. (eds.) 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bunge, M.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Ontology II: A World of Systems, vol. 4 (1979)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nelson, H.J., Poels, G., Genero, M., Piattini, M.: A conceptual modeling quality framework. Software Quality Journal 20, 201–228 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosemann, M., Recker, J., Indulska, M., Green, P.: A study of the evolution of the representational capabilities of process modeling grammars. In: Martinez, F.H., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4001, pp. 447–461. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goumopoulos, C., Kameas, A.: Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications. Springer, Netherlands (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    zur Muehlen, M., Indulska, M., Kamp, G.: Business Process and Business Rule Modeling: A Representational Analysis. In: 2007 Eleventh International IEEE EDOC Conference Workshop, pp. 189–196. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yan, Z., Dijkman, R., Grefen, P.: Business process model repositories – Framework and survey. Information and Software Technology 54, 380–395 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rudzajs, P., Buksa, I.: Business Process and Regulations: Approach to Linkage and Change Management. In: Grabis, J., Kirikova, M. (eds.) BIR 2011. LNBIP, vol. 90, pp. 96–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kirikova, M., Buksa, I., Penicina, L.: Raw Materials for Business Processes in Cloud. In: Bider, I., Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Wrycza, S. (eds.) BPMDS 2012 and EMMSAD 2012. LNBIP, vol. 113, pp. 241–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Softwareag: ARIS ArchiMate Modeler, http://goo.gl/WI76E
  19. 19.
    Chinosi, M., Trombetta, A.: BPMN: An introduction to the standard. Computer Standards & Interfaces 34, 124–134 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Van Den Berg, M.: ArchiMate, BPMN and UML: An approach to harmonizing the notations. Orbus software white paper (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Creative Commons, http://creativecommons.org/
  23. 23.
    Creative Commons: CC API documentation: Version 1.0, http://goo.gl/I1FNC
  24. 24.
    SHERPA/RoMEO - Publisher copyright policies & self-archiving, http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/
  25. 25.
    SHERPA/RoMEO: XML schema for Publisher’s version/PDF, http://goo.gl/OypG6

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ludmila Penicina
    • 1
  • Marite Kirikova
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Applied Computer SystemsRiga Technical UniversityRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations