Towards Creating an Evolvable Semantic Platform for Formation of Research Teams

  • Eduard Babkin
  • Nikolay Karpov
  • Oleg Kozyrev
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 158)

Abstract

In this paper authors wish to present an approach to information modeling and software design suitable for developing evolvable semantic applications in the domain of research team formation. The novel proposals include specialization of generic paradigm of ontological engineering, specific types of machine-readable RDF ontologies and application of temporal look at information relevant for team formation. In order to validate theoretical approach a software prototype of the evolvable web-based semantic platform InfoPort was developed.

Keywords

teams formation ontologies service-oriented design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hollenbeck, J.R., Beersma, B., Schouten, M.E.: Beyond team types and taxonomies: A dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description. Academy of Management Review 37(1), 82–106 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dodson, M.V., Guan, L.L., Fernyhough, M.E., Mir, P.S., Bucci, L., McFarland, D.C., Novakofski, J., et al.: Perspectives on the formation of an interdisciplinary research team (short survey). Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 391(2), 1155–1157 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ounnas, A., Davis, H.C., Millard, D.E.: Semantic Modeling for Group Formation. In: Procs. of Workshop on Personalisation in E-Learning Environments at Individual and Group Level (PING) at the 11th International Conference on User Modeling, UM 2007, Corfu, Greece (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Germain, M.-L.: Developing trust in virtual teams. Performance Improvement Quarterly 24(3), 29–54 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gero, J.S., Kannengiesser, U.: An ontology of situated design teams. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM 21(3), 295–308 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hodík, J., Vokřínek, J., Bečvář, P.: Support for virtual organisation creation - Partners’ profiles and competency management. International Journal of Agent-Oriented Software Engineering 3(2-3), 230–251 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Corcho, O., Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. Where is their meeting point? Data and Knowledge Engineering 46, 41–64 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    García-Barriocanal, E., Sicilia, M.-A., Sánchez-Alonso, S.: Computing with competencies: Modelling organizational capacities. Expert Systems with Applications 39(16), 12310–12318 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Partridge, C.: Business Objects: Re-engineering for Re-use, 2nd edn. The BORO Centre (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Christakis, N.A., Fowler, J.: Connected: the surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. Little, Brown and Co., New York (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hodík, J., Vokřínek, J., Bíba, J., Bečvář, P.: Competencies and profiles management for virtual organizations creation. In: Burkhard, H.-D., Lindemann, G., Verbrugge, R., Varga, L.Z. (eds.) CEEMAS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4696, pp. 93–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Da Silva, J.L.T., Ribeiro, A.M., Primo, T.T., Viccari, R.M.: A reference profile ontology for communities of practice. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 7(3), 185–196 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Isotani, S., Inaba, A., Ikeda, M., Mizoguchi, R.: An ontology engineering approach to the realization of theory-driven group formation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4(4), 445–478 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Steffen-Fluhr, N., Collins, R., Passerini, K., Wu, B., Gruzd, A., Zhu, M., Hiltz, R.: Leveraging Social Network Data to Support Faculty Mentoring: Best Practices. In: Women in Engineering Program Advocates Network (WEPAN) National Conference, Columbus, OH, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ounnas, A., Davis, H., Millard, D.: A Framework for Semantic Group Formation. In: Procs. of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2008), Santander, Cantabria, Spain, pp. 34–38 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vokřínek, J., Bíba, J., Hodik, J., Vybíhal, J.: The RBVO formation protocol. International Journal of Agent-Oriented Software Engineering 3(2-3), 135–162 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heckmann, D., Schwartz, T., Brandherm, B., Schmitz, M., von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, M.: Gumo – The general user model ontology. In: Ardissono, L., Brna, P., Mitrović, A. (eds.) UM 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3538, pp. 428–432. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduard Babkin
    • 1
  • Nikolay Karpov
    • 1
  • Oleg Kozyrev
    • 1
  1. 1.National Research University Higher School of EconomicsNizhny NovgorodRussia

Personalised recommendations