Skip to main content

The Relationships between Software Development Processes and Software Product Quality

  • Conference paper
Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 158))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The main motivation for software process assessment and improvement (i.e. performed in accordance with standard ISO/IEC 15504) is that the software product, developed according to improved processes, will be of higher quality (determined by ISO/IEC 25010). ISO/IEC 15504 refer to the ISO/IEC 12207 which describes processes performed in software acquiring or developing organizations. The relations between software processes and quality characteristics seem intuitive but there is little empirical evidence to prove its validity. The paper describes the first stage of research where practitioners try to find and explain relationships between software quality characteristics (ISO/IEC 25010) and software life cycle processes (ISO/IEC 12207). The motivation for the research lies in the assumption that if the acquirer is particularly interested in a certain quality characteristic of the product, the supplier may put special emphasis on these software processes that have a significant impact on this attribute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. New Webster’s Expanded Dictionary (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crosby, P.B.: Quality is Free. McGraw-Hill Inc. (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Juran, J.M.: Juran on Quality by Design. The Free Press, Division of Macmillan Inc. (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Juran, J.M.: Quality Control Handbook, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Inc. (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  5. UK Sales and Supply of Goods Act (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deming, W.E.: The New Economics. MIT Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. ISO 9000:2005 Quality management systems – Fundamentals and vocabulary

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garvin, D.A.: What Does “Product Quality” Really Mean? Sloan Management Review, 25–43 (Fall 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  9. KobyliƄski, A.: Modele jakoƛci produktów i procesów programowych, OW SGH, Warszawa (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCall, J.A., Richards, P.K., Walters, G.F.: Factors in Software Quality, 1-3, RADC-TR-77-369, Rome Air Development Center, Griffiss Air Force Base, NY 13441-5700 (November 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boehm, B.W., Brown, J.R., Kaspar, H., Lipow, M., MacLeod, G.J., Merritt, M.J.: Characteristics of Software Quality, Amsterdam (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  12. ISO/IEC 9126:1991 Software engineering – Product quality

    Google Scholar 

  13. ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001 Software engineering – Product quality – Part 1: Quality model; ISO/IEC TR 9126-2:2003 Software engineering – Product quality – Part 2: External metrics; ISO/IEC TR 9126-3:2003 Software engineering – Product quality – Part 3: Internal metrics; ISO/IEC TR 9126-4:2004 Software engineering – Product quality – Part 4: Quality in use metrics

    Google Scholar 

  14. ISO/IEC 25000:2005 Software Engineering – Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – Guide to SQuaRE

    Google Scholar 

  15. ISO/IEC 25010:2011 Systems and software engineering – Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – System and software quality models

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paulk, M.C., Weber, C.V., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B.: The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chrissis, M.B., Konrad, M., Shrum, S.: CMMI for Development: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bell Canada, The Trillium Model (1994), http://www.sqi.griffith.edu.au/trillium/ (access: May 1, 2013)

  19. Bicego, A., Khurana, M., Kuvaja, P.: Bootstrap 3.0 – Software Process Assessment Methodology. In: Hawkins, C., Ross, M., Staples, G. (eds.) Software Quality Management VI. Springer (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. ISO/IEC TR 15504:1998 Information technology - Software process assessment - Part 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  21. ISO/IEC 12207:1995 Information technology – Software life cycle processes

    Google Scholar 

  22. ISO/IEC 15504:2004 Information technology – Process assessment – Part 1–9 (part 2 was issued earlier; parts 5-9 were issued later)

    Google Scholar 

  23. ISO/IEC 12207:2008 Systems and software engineering – Software life cycle processes

    Google Scholar 

  24. ISO/IEC 15504-5:2012 Information technology – Process assessment – Part 5: An exemplar software life cycle process assessment model

    Google Scholar 

  25. Woodman, I.H.G.: Relationship Between the Activities of Software Process and the Quality of the Software Product. University Of Strathclyde, Department of Computer Science, Research Report/94/171

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ashrafi, N.: The Impact of Software Process Improvement on Quality: in Theory and Practice. Information and Management 40(7), 677–690 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. van Solingen, R., Berghout, E.: Causal Relationships between Improvements in Software Development Processes and Final Software Product Quality. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation 11(1), 1–10 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. ESSI-SCOPE, http://www.cse.dcu.ie/essiscope/sm5/relation.html (access May 1, 2013)

  29. Chemuturi, M.: Mastering Software Quality Assurance: Best Practices, Tools and Techniques for Software Developers. J. Ross Publishing, Inc. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Islam, A.K.M.M., Gorschek, T., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Feldt, R., Permadi, R.B., Cheng, C.K.: Evaluation and Measurement of Software Process Improvement—A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 38(2), 398–424 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. ISO 9001:2008 Quality management systems – Requirements

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

KobyliƄski, A. (2013). The Relationships between Software Development Processes and Software Product Quality. In: KobyliƄski, A., Sobczak, A. (eds) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. BIR 2013. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 158. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40823-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40823-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40822-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40823-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics