What Happened to the Crossdisciplinarity of Technology-Enhanced Learning in 2004?

  • Marco Kalz
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8095)


In a recent study the crossdisciplinarity of the field of Technology-Enhanced Learning was analysed with science-overlay-maps and diversity measures. Results reveal that the crossdisciplinarity of the field has constantly increased over the last 10 years. Only in 2004, a significant decrease of interdisciplinary research could be identified. In this paper we take a closer look at the publications of this year and test our hypotheses for the decrease of crossdisciplinarity.


Science Citation Index Social Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expand Educational Science Journal Ranking 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Sawyer, R.K.: Optimising learning: Implications of learning sciences research. OECD, Paris (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Conole, G., Scanlon, E., Mundin, P.: Technology enhanced learning as a site for interdisciplinary research. Report for the TLRP TEL programme (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Plowman, L., Misailidou, C., Laurillard, D.: Developing Research Capacity for Technology-Enhanced Learning, London, UK (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kalz, M., Specht, M.: Assessing the crossdisciplinarity of Technology-Enhanced Learning with Science Overlay Maps and Diversity Measures. British Journal of Educational Technology (in press)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rafols, I., Porter, A.L., Leydesdorff, L.: Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 61, 1871–1887 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leydesdorff, L.: Mapping interdisciplinarity at the interfaces between the Science Citation Index and the Social Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 391–405 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Porter, A.L., Rafols, I.: Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics 81, 719–745 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rao, C.: Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach. Theoretical Population Biology, 24–43 (1982)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stirling, A.: A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 4, 707–719 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rafols, I., Meyer, M.: Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case Studies in Bionanoscience. Scientometrics 82, 263–287 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leydesdorff, L., Rafols, I.: A Global Map of Science Based on the ISI Subject Categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60, 348–362 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leydesdorff, L., Carley, S., Rafols, I.: Global Maps of Science based on the new Web-of-Science Categories. Scientometrics 81, 1–5 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Batagelj, V., Mrvar, A.: Pajek – Program for Large Network Analysis. Connections 21, 1–11 (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sutherland, R., Eagle, S., Joubert, M.: A Vision and Strategy for Technology Enhanced Learning: Report from the STELLAR Network of Excellence, Bristol, UK, p. 60 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rafols, I., Leydesdorff, L., O’Hare, A., Nightingale, P., Stirling, A.: How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management. Research Policy 41, 1262–1282 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Kalz
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Learning Sciences and Technologies (CELSTEC)Open University of the NetherlandsHeerlenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations