Supporting Citizen Inquiry: An Investigation of Moon Rock
Citizen inquiry is an innovative way for non-professionals to engage in practical scientific activities, in which they take the role of self-regulated scientists in informal learning contexts. This type of activity has similarities to inquiry-based learning and to citizen science, but also important differences. To understand the challenges of supporting citizen inquiry, a prototype system and activity has been developed: the Moon Rock Explorer. Based on the nQuire Toolkit, this offers people without geology expertise an open investigation into authentic specimens of Moon rock, using a Virtual Microscope. The Moon Rock Explorer inquiry has been evaluated in an informal learning context with PhD students from the Open University. Results of the evaluation raise issues related to motivation and interaction between inquiry participants. They also provide evidence that the integration of scientific tools was successful and that the nQuire Toolkit is suitable to deploy and enact citizen inquiries.
KeywordsCitizen inquiry nQuire Science learning Informal learning
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Raddick, J., Lintott, C.J., Schawinski, K., Thomas, D., Nichol, R.C., Andreescu, D., Bamford, S., et al.: Galaxy Zoo Team: Galaxy Zoo: An Experiment in Public Science Participation. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society 38, 892 (2007)Google Scholar
- 9.Wilderman, C.C.: Models of community science: design lessons from the field. In: McEver, C., Bonney, R., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Rosenberg, K., Shirk, J.L. (eds.) Citizen Science Toolkit Conference. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca (2007)Google Scholar
- 12.Sharples, M., Anastopoulou, S.: Designing orchestration for inquiry learning. In: Littleton, K., Scanlon, E., Sharples, M. (eds.) Orchestrating Inquiry Learning, pp. 69–85. Routledge (2011)Google Scholar
- 14.Linn, M.C., Slotta, J.D.: Enabling participants in online forums to learn from each other. Collaborative Learning, Reasoning, and Technology, 61–97 (2006)Google Scholar
- 16.Clow, D., Makriyannis, E.: iSpot Analysed: Participatory Learning and Reputation. Learning, 34–43 (2011)Google Scholar
- 17.Mulholland, P., Anastopoulou, S., Collins, T., Feisst, M., Gaved, M., Kerawalla, L., Paxton, M., et al.: nQuire: technological support for personal inquiry learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies First publ.(99), 1–14 (2012)Google Scholar
- 18.Scanlon, E., Anastopoulou, S., Kerawalla, L.: Inquiry learning reconsidered: contexts, representations and challenges. In: Littleton, K., Scanlon, E., Sharples, M. (eds.) Orchestrating Inquiry Learning, pp. 69–85. Routledge (2011)Google Scholar
- 19.Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proc. ACM CHI 1990 Conf., Seattle, WA, April 1-5, pp. 249–256 (1990)Google Scholar
- 20.Cairns, P., Cox, A.L.: Research methods for human-computer interaction. Cambridge University Press (2008)Google Scholar