Advertisement

An Investigation of Two Methods for the Technological Mediation of Collaborative Peer Feedback in Higher Education

  • Andria Pavlou
  • Eleni A. Kyza
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8095)

Abstract

Even though several studies have examined peer feedback through synchronous and asynchronous communication within the context of distance learning, few have addressed its contribution in higher education face-to-face settings. This proposal addresses this gap by examining peer feedback mediated through synchronous and asynchronous communication in the context of a face-to-face university course. Thirty-five undergraduate students participated in this study to provide feedback to each other’s work through synchronous (chat) or asynchronous collaboration (in-context commenting). A variety of data were collected and included pre- and post-course surveys, videos and student interviews. The analysis of the results showed that students take advantage of the feedback they receive from their peers. As findings showed, peer feedback through asynchronous communication helped students learn, while peer feedback, mediated through synchronous tools, was important for interpersonal communication. Even when the feedback was not used to improve course work, students took it into serious consideration.

Keywords

Peer feedback synchronous communication asynchronous communication 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hattie, J., Timperley, H.: The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77(1), 81–112 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Topping, K.: Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research 68(3), 249–276 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mory, E.H.: Feedback research revisited. In: Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 745–783 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Falchikov, N.: Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education. Routledge Falmer, London (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kear, K.: Peer learning using asynchronous discussion systems in distance education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning 19(2), 151–164 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mabrito, M.: A study of synchronous versus asynchronous collaboration in an online business writing class. The American Journal of Distance Education 20(2), 93–107 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park, Y., Bonk, C.: Synchronous learning experiences: Distance and residential learners’ perspectives in a blended graduate course. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 6(3), 245–264 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mory, E.H.: The use of informational feedback in instruction: Implications for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development 40(3), 5–20 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsangouras, E.: Strategies of Teaching. Gutenberg, Athens (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gibbs, G., Simpson, C.: Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 1(1), 3–31 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kalaitzi, E., Derri, V., Vasiliadou, O., Kioumourtzoglou, E.: Academic learning time in elementary Physical Education class. Inquiries in Sport & Physical Education 5(2), 187–198 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cho, K., MacArthur, C.: Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction 20(4), 328–338 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Born-Lechleitner, I., Kepler, J.: Peer feedback in blended learning. Vienna English Working Papers 18(3), 185–187 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Corgan, R., Hammer, V., Margolies, M., Crossley, C.: Methods-making your online course successful. Business Education Forum 58(3), 51–54 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Falchikov, N.: Improving learning through critical peer feedback and reflection. Different approaches: Theory and practice in Higher Education. In: Proceedings of HERDSA Conference (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ertmer, P., Richardson, J., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G., et al.: Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 12(2), 412–433 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu, N., Carless, D.: Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education 11(3), 279–290 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xie, Y., Ke, F., Sharma, P.: The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students’ reflective learning processes. Internet and Higher Education 11, 18–25 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meerah, T., Halim, L.: Improve feedback on teaching and learning at the university through peer group. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 18, 633–637 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnson, G.: Synchronous and asynchronous text-based CMC in educational contexts: A review of recent research. TechTrends 50(4), 46–53 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kyza, E.A., Constantinou, C.P.: STOCHASMOS: A web-based platform for reflective, inquiry-based teaching and learning. In: Cyprus: Learning in Science Group (2007), http://www.stochasmos.org
  22. 22.
    STOCHASMOS: Web-based reflective inquiry environments (2012), http://www.stochasmos.org/nqcontent.cfm?a_id=792
  23. 23.
    Liu, E.Z.F., Lin, S.S.J., Chiu, C.H., Yuan, S.M.: Web-based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education 44(3), 246–251 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guardado, M., Shi, L.: ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback. Computers and Composition 24(4), 443–461 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andria Pavlou
    • 1
  • Eleni A. Kyza
    • 1
  1. 1.Cyprus University of TechnologyLimassolCyprus

Personalised recommendations