Skip to main content

Therapie des infarktbedingten kardiogenen Schocks

  • Chapter
Weiterbildung Notfallmedizin
  • 5207 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der infarktbedingte kardiogene Schock – meist die Folge eines linksventrikulären Pumpversagens – hat mit einer Sterblichkeit von 50-80% weiterhin eine schlechte Prognose. Therapieentscheidend ist die möglichst frühzeitige Wiedereröffnung des verschlossenen Koronargefäßes. Die Schockbehandlung beinhaltet die medikamentöse Herz-Kreislauf-Therapie mit Dobutamin als Inotropikum und Noradrenalin als Vasopressor der Wahl, gesteuert anhand einer Kombination von Druck- und Flussparametern, z. B. einem mittleren Blutdruck von 65-75 mmHg und einem Herzindex >2,51/min/m2. Die bestmögliche Therapie des kardiogenen Schocks beinhaltet zudem die intensivrnedizinischen Maßnahmen zur Vermeidung bzw. Behandlung des Multiorgandysfunktionssyndroms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Webb JG, Sleeper LA, Buller CE et al (2000) Implications of the timing of onset of cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: a reportfrom the SHOCKTrial Registry. SHould we emergently revascu- larize Ocduded Coronaries for car¬diogenic shocK? J Am Coli Cardiol 36:1084–1090

    Google Scholar 

  2. HochmanJS, Buller CE, Sleeper LA et al (2000) Cardiogenic shock com- plicating acute myocardial infarctionetiologies, managementand outcome: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize ocduded coro¬naries for cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coli Cardiol 36:1063–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldberg RJ, Spencer FA, Gore JM et al (2009) Thirty-year trends (1975-2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital de- ath rates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acu-te myocardial infarction. Circulation 119:112–119

    Google Scholar 

  4. Werdan K, Ruß M, Buerke M et al (2011) Cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction: diagnosis, monitoring and treatment. A Ger- man-Austrian S3 guideline. Dtsch Arztebl Int 109:343-351. (Kardiologe (2011) 5:166-224; Intensivmed (2011) 48:291 -344; Intensiv- und Notfallbehandlung (2012) 2:249–130)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Menon V, Slater JN, White HD et al (2000) Acute myocardial infarcti¬on complicated by systemic hypo- perfusion without hypotension: report of the SHOCK trial registry. Am J Med 108:374–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. HochmanJS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG etal (1999) Early revascularizati- on in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 341:625–634

    Google Scholar 

  7. HochmanJS, Sleeper LA, White HD et al (2001) One-year survival follo- wing early revascularization for cardiogenic shock. JAMA 285:190–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. HochmanJS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG et al (2006) Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction JAMA 295:2511¬2515

    Google Scholar 

  9. S3-Leitlinie Infarktbedingter kar- diogener Schock - Diagnose, Mo¬nitoring und Therapie. http://leitli- nien.net/ AWMF-Leitlinien-Regis- ter Nr. 019/013; Entwicklungsstu¬fe 3+IDA; HTML-Code aktualisiert: 25. Juni 2011

    Google Scholar 

  10. White HD, Assmann SF, Sanborn TA et al (2005) Comparison of per- cutaneous coronary Intervention and coronary artery bypass graf- ting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the Should We Emergently Revascularize Oc¬cluded Coronaries for Cardioge¬nic Shock (SHOCK) trial. Circulation 112:1992–2001

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Picard MH, Davidoff R, Sleeper LA et al (2003) Echocardiographic pre- dictorsof survival and response to early revascularization in cardiogenic shock. Circulation 107:279–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Russ MA, Prondzinsky R, Christoph A et al (2007) Hemodynamic im- provementfollowing levosimen- dan treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med 35:2732–2739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alexander JH, Reynolds HR, Steb- bins AL et al (2007) Effect of tilargi- nine acetate in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: theTRIUMPH ran- domized controlled trial. JAMA 297:1657–1666

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. SakrY, Reinhart K, Vincent JL et al (2006) Does dopamine administra¬tion in shock influence outcome? Results of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely III Patients (SOAP) Study. Crit Care Med 34:589–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J etal (2010) Comparison of dopa¬mine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med 362:779–789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fuhrmann JT, Schmeisser A, Schulze MR et al (2008) Levosimendan is superiorto enoximone in refracto- ry cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Crit Care Med 36:2257–2266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Prondzinsky R, Lemm H, Swy- ter M et al (2010) Intra-aortic bal- loon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the prospective, randomized IABP SHOCKTrial for attenuation of mul¬tiorgan dysfunction Syndrome. Crit Care Med 38:152–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Unverzagt S, Machemer MT, Solms A et al (2011) Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD007398

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sjauw KD, Engstrom AE, Vis MM et al (2009) A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-eleva- tion myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines? Eur He- artJ

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thiele H, Smalling RW, Schuler GC (2007) Percutaneous left ventricu- lar assist devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 28:2057–2063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruß, M., Buerke, M., Werdan, K. (2013). Therapie des infarktbedingten kardiogenen Schocks. In: Dirks, B., Somasundaram, R., Waydhas, C., Zeymer, U. (eds) Weiterbildung Notfallmedizin. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40720-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40720-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40719-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40720-8

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics