Skip to main content

PET/MRI of the Liver

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover PET/MRI

Abstract

Current imaging methods for liver disease include the use of US, CT, MRI and PET/CT. While US and CT are the initial and more cost-effective imaging methods worldwide, MR imaging has become the modality of choice for liver imaging due to its high sensitivity and specificity in characterizing liver lesions. Introduction of liver-specific MR contrast agents has further increased the role of MR imaging of liver in primary and secondary liver malignancy lesion detection, treatment planning, and follow-up. Similarly, 18 FDG PET/CT imaging has established a place in staging and follow-up of liver malignancies, especially of liver metastases. Due to decreased sensitivity of 18FDG PET in primary hepatocellular carcinoma, focus is being made on introduction of new radiotracers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Drzezga A, Souvatzoglou M, Eiber M, et al. First clinical experience with integrated whole-body PET/MR: comparison to PET/CT in patients with oncologic diagnoses. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(6):845–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel MJ, Acharyya S, Hoffer FA, et al. Whole-body MR imaging for staging of malignant tumors in pediatric patients: results of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6660 trial. Radiology. 2013;266(2):599–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gu J, Chan T, Zhang J, et al. Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging: the added value to whole-body MRI at initial diagnosis of lymphoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(3):W384–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. He YX, Guo QY. Clinical applications and advances of positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) in the diagnosis of liver neoplasms. Postgrad Med J. 2008;84(991):246–51.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee SD, Kim SH, Kim YK, et al. (18)F-FDG-PET/CT predicts early tumor recurrence in living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Transpl Int. 2013;26(1):50–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Paudyal B, Oriuchi N, Paudyal P, et al. Early diagnosis of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma with 18F-FDG PET after radiofrequency ablation therapy. Oncol Rep. 2007;18(6):1469–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lan BY, Kwee SA, Wong LL. Positron emission tomography in hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies: a review. Am J Surg. 2012;204(2):232–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shiomi S, Kawabe J. Clinical applications of positron emission tomography in hepatic tumors. Hepatol Res. 2011;41(7):611–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ijichi H, Shirabe K, Taketomi A, et al. Clinical usefulness of (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for patients with primary liver cancer with special reference to rare histological types, hepatocellular carcinoma with sarcomatous change and combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2013;43(5):481–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Treglia G, Giovannini E, Di Franco D, et al. The role of positron emission tomography using carbon-11 and fluorine-18 choline in tumors other than prostate cancer: a systematic review. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26(6):451–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bieze M, Bennink RJ, El-Massoudi Y, et al. The use of 18F-fluoromethylcholine PET/CT in differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy. Nucl Med Commun. 2013;34(2):146–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Frisch K, Bender D, Hansen SB, et al. Nucleophilic radiosynthesis of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-galactose from Talose triflate and biodistribution in a porcine model. Nucl Med Biol. 2011;38(4):477–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sorensen M, Frisch K, Bender D, et al. The potential use of 2-[(1)(8)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-galactose as a PET/CT tracer for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38(9):1723–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eckel F, Herrmann K, Schmidt S, et al. Imaging of proliferation in hepatocellular carcinoma with the in vivo marker 18F-fluorothymidine. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(9):1441–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones C, Badger SA, McKie LD, et al. PET-CT accurately predicts the pre-operative characteristics of colorectal hepatic metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38(12):1184–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Georgakopoulos A, Pianou N, Kelekis N, et al. Impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT on therapeutic decisions in patients with colorectal cancer and liver metastases. Clin Imaging. 2013;37(3):536–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bipat S, van Leeuwen MS, Comans EF, et al. Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis–meta-analysis. Radiology. 2005;237(1):123–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Strasberg SM, Dehdashti F. Role of FDG-PET staging in selecting the optimum patient for hepatic resection of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102(8):955–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lowenthal D, Zeile M, Lim WY, et al. Detection and characterisation of focal liver lesions in colorectal carcinoma patients: comparison of diffusion-weighted and Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(4):832–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Small RM, Lubezky N, Shmueli E, et al. Response to chemotherapy predicts survival following resection of hepatic colo-rectal metastases in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99(2):93–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Veit P, Antoch G, Stergar H, et al. Detection of residual tumor after radiofrequency ablation of liver metastasis with dual-modality PET/CT: initial results. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(1):80–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar R, Sharma P, Garg P, et al. Role of (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET-CT in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(11):2408–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schreiter NF, Nogami M, Steffen I, et al. Evaluation of the potential of PET-MRI fusion for detection of liver metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(2):458–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Contractor K, Challapalli A, Tomasi G, et al. Imaging of cellular proliferation in liver metastasis by [18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography: effect of therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57(11):3419–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kubota K, Watanabe H, Murata Y, et al. Effects of blood glucose level on FDG uptake by liver: a F-FDG-PET/CT study. Nucl Med Biol. 2011;38(3):347–51.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Boellaard R, O’Doherty MJ, Weber WA, et al. F-FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(1):181–200.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raj Mohan Paspulati MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paspulati, R.M., Kohan, A.A. (2014). PET/MRI of the Liver. In: Carrio, I., Ros, P. (eds) PET/MRI. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40692-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40692-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40691-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40692-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics