Advertisement

A Privacy Preserving Approach to Smart Metering

  • Merwais Shinwari
  • Amr Youssef
  • Walaa Hamouda
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 381)

Abstract

High frequency power consumption readings produced by smart meters introduce a major privacy threat to residential consumers as they reveal details that could be used to infer information about the activities of home occupants. In this paper, we question the need to disclose high frequency readings produced at the home’s level. Instead, we propose equipping smart meters with sufficient processing power enabling them to provide the utility company with a set of well-defined services based on these readings. For demand side management, we propose the collection of high frequency readings at a higher level in the distribution network, such as local step-down transformers, as this readily provides the accumulated demand of all homes within a branch. Furthermore, we study the effect of the proposed approach on consumers’ privacy, using correlation and relative entropy as measures. We also study the effect of load balancing on consumers’ privacy when using the proposed approach. Finally, we assess the detection of different appliances using high frequency readings collected for demand side management purposes.

Keywords

Smart Grid Smart Meter Privacy Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Collier, S.E.: Ten steps to a smarter grid. In: Proc. IEEE Rural Electric Power Conference, REPC 2009, pp. B2–B7 (April 2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caron, S., Kesidis, G.: Incentive-based energy consumption scheduling algorithms for the smart grid. In: Proc. First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, SmartGridComm, pp. 391–396 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, C., Kishore, S., Snyder, L.V.: An innovative RTP-based residential power scheduling scheme for smart grids. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP, pp. 5956–5959 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mohsenian-Rad, A.H., Wong, V., Jatskevich, J., Schober, R.: Optimal and autonomous incentive-based energy consumption scheduling algorithm for smart grid. In: Proc. IEEE PES Conference on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, pp. 1–6 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liang, J., Ng, S.K.K., Kendall, G., Cheng, J.W.M.: Load signature study—part i: basic concept, structure, and methodology. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 25, 551–560 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liang, J., Ng, S.K.K., Kendall, G., Cheng, J.W.M.: Load signature study—part ii: disaggregation framework, simulation, and applications. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 25, 561–569 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hart, G.W.: Nonintrusive appliance load monitoring. Proceedings of the IEEE 80(12), 1870–1891 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quinn, E.: Privacy and the new energy infrastructure. Working Paper Series (2009), http://ssrn.com/abstract=1370731
  10. 10.
    Cavoukian, A.: Privacy by design: achieving the gold standard in data protection for the smart grid, http://www.ipc.on.ca/images/resources/achieve-goldstnd.pdf
  11. 11.
    Cavoukian, A.: Smart privacy for the smart grid: embedding privacy into the design of electricity conservation, http://www.ipc.on.ca/images/resources/pbd-smartpriv-smartgrid.pdf
  12. 12.
    Cavoukian, A.: Operationalizing privacy by design: the Ontario smart grid case study, http://www.ipc.on.ca/images/Resources/pbd-ont-smartgrid-casestudy.pdf
  13. 13.
    Kalogridis, G., Efthymiou, C., Denic, S.Z., Lewis, T.A., Cepeda, R.: Privacy for smart meters: towards undetectable appliance load signatures. In: Proc. IEEE Smart Grid Commun. Conf., Gaithersburg, Maryland, pp. 232–237 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kalogridis, G., Zhong, F., Basutkar, S.: Affordable privacy for home smart meters. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop Smart Grid Security Commun., SGSC, Busan, Korea, May 26-28, pp. 77–84 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Efthymiou, C., Kalogridis, G.: Smart grid privacy via anonymization of smart metering data. In: Proc. IEEE Smart Grid Commun. Conf., Gaithersburg, Maryland, pp. 238–243 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tomosada, M., Sinohara, Y.: Virtual energy demand data: estimating energy load and protecting consumers’ privacy. In: Proc. 2011 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, ISGT 2011, Medellin, Colombia, pp. 1–8 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mitchell, C. (ed.): Trusted computing. Institution of Electrical Engineers (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pearson, S.: Trusted computing platforms, the next security solution. HP Labs (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Richardson, I., Thomson, M., Infield, D.: A high-resolution domestic building occupancy model for energy demand simulations. Energy and Buildings 40(8), 1560–1566 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ontario Demand and Market Prices. The Independent Electricity System Operator, http://www.ieso.ca/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Merwais Shinwari
    • 1
  • Amr Youssef
    • 1
  • Walaa Hamouda
    • 2
  1. 1.Concordia Institute for Information Systems Engineering (CIISE)Canada
  2. 2.Electrical and Computer Engineering DepartmentConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations