Skip to main content

Analysis and Combination of Forward and Backward Based Decoders for Improved Speech Transcription

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8082))

Abstract

This paper analysis the behavior of forward and backward-based decoders used for speech transcription. Experiments have showed that backward-based decoding leads to similar recognition performance as forward-based decoding, which is consistent with the fact that both systems handle similar information through the acoustic, lexical and language models. However, because of heuristics, search algorithms used in decoding explore only a limited portion of the search space. As forward-based and backward-based approaches do not process the speech signal in the same temporal way, they explore different portions of the search space; leading to complementary systems that can be efficiently combined using the ROVER approach. The speech transcription results achieved by combining forward-based and backward-based systems are significantly better than the results obtained by combining the same amount of forward-only or backward-only systems. This confirms the complementary of the forward and backward approaches and thus the usefulness of their combination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fiscus, J.G.: A post-processing system to yield reduced word error rates: Recognizer Output Voting Error Reduction (ROVER). In: Proc. ASRU 1997, IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, pp. 347–354 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schwenk, H., Gauvain, J.-L.: Combining multiple speech recognizers using voting and language model information. In: Proc. INTERSPEECH 2000, pp. 915–918 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hillard, D., Hoffmeister, B., Ostendorf, M., Schlüter, R., Ney, H.: iROVER: improving system combination with classification. In: Conf. of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Rochester, New-York, pp. 65–68 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Evermann, G., Woodland, P.C.: Posterior probability decoding, confidence estimation and system combination. In: Proc. NIST Speech Transcription Workshop (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bougares, F., Estéve, Y., Deléglise, P., Linares, G.: Bag of n-gram driven decoding for LVCSR system harnessing. In: Proc. ASRU 2011, IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, Hawaï, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sphinx (2011), http://cmusphinx.sourceforge.net/

  7. Julius, http://julius.sourceforge.jp/en_index.php

  8. Galliano, S., Gravier, G., Chaubard, L.: The Ester 2 evaluation campaign for rich transcription of French broadcasts. In: Proc. INTERSPEECH 2009, 10th Annual Conf. of the Int. Speech Communication Association, Brighton, UK, pp. 2583–2586 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gravier, G., Adda, G., Paulsson, N., Carré, M., Giraudel, A., Galibert, O.: The ETAPE corpus for the evaluation of speech-based TV content processing in the French language. In: Proc. LREC 2012, Int. Conf. on Language Resources, Evaluation and Corpora, Istanbul, Turkey (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Estéve, Y., Bazillon, T., Antoine, J.-Y., Béchet, F., Farinas, J.: The EPAC corpus: Manual and automatic annotations of conversational speech in French broadcast news. In: Proc. LREC 2010, European Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation, Valetta, Malta (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Corpus EPAC: Transcriptions orthographiques. Catalogue ELRA, reference ELRA-S0305, http://catalog.elra.info

  12. de Calmés, M., Pérennou, G.: BDLEX: A Lexicon for Spoken and Written French. In: Proc. LREC 1998, 1st Int. Conf. on Language Resources & Evaluation, Grenade, pp. 1129–1136 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Illina, I., Fohr, D., Jouvet, D.: Grapheme-to-Phoneme Conversion using Conditional Random Fields. In: Proc. INTERSPEECH 2011, Florence, Italy (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stolcke, A.: SRILM - An Extensible Language Modeling Toolkit. In: Proc. ICSLP 2002, Int. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing, Denver, Colorado (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mendonça, A., Graff, D., DiPersio, D.: French Gigaword Second Edition. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. NIST evaluation tools, http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/mig//tools/

  17. Gravier, G., Adda, G.: Evaluations en traitement automatique de la parole (ETAPE). Evaluation Plan, Etape 2011, version 2.0 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. HTK, http://htk.eng.cam.ac.uk/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jouvet, D., Fohr, D. (2013). Analysis and Combination of Forward and Backward Based Decoders for Improved Speech Transcription. In: Habernal, I., Matoušek, V. (eds) Text, Speech, and Dialogue. TSD 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8082. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40585-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40585-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40584-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40585-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics