Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Graduate Texts in Mathematics ((GTM,volume 230))

  • 9362 Accesses

Abstract

This whole chapter is devoted to Markov processes that are reversible. The emphasis is on the restoration of quantitative results that were lost in Chap. 4 when Doeblin’s condition was not present. The chapter concludes with the application of these results to the simulated annealing algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The reader who did Exercise 2.4.1 should recognize that the condition below is precisely the same as the statement that P=P . In particular, if one knows the conclusion of that exercise, then one has no need for the discussion which follows.

  2. 2.

    A Hilbert space is a vector space equipped with an inner product which determines a norm for which the associated metric is complete.

  3. 3.

    If one knows spectral theory, especially Stone’s theorem, the rather cumbersome argument that follows can be avoided.

  4. 4.

    If that is not already so, we can make it so by choosing k 0 to be a point at which H takes its minimum value and replacing H by HH(k 0). Such a replacement leaves both γ(β) and Q(β) as well as the quantity on the right hand side of (6.4.10) unchanged.

  5. 5.

    Actually, there is good reason to doubt that monotonically increasing β may not be the best strategy. Indeed, the name “simulated annealing” derives from the idea that what one wants to do is simulate the annealing process familiar to chemists, material scientists, skilled carpenters, and followers of Metropolis. Namely, what these people do is alternately heat and cool to achieve their goal, and there is reason to believe we should be following their example. However, I have chosen not to follow them on the unforgivable, but understandable, grounds that my analysis is capable of handling only the monotone case.

References

  1. Diaconis, P., Stroock, D.: Geometric bounds for eigenvalues of Markov chains. Ann. Appl. Probab. 1(1), 36–61 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Holley, R., Stroock, D.: Simulated annealing via Sobolev inequalities. Commun. Math. Phys. 115(4), 553–569 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Riesz, F., Sz.-Nagy, B.: Functional Analysis. Dover, New York (1990). Translated from the French edition by F. Boron, reprint of 1955 original

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Stroock, D.: Mathematics of Probability. GSM, vol. 149. AMS, Providence (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stroock, D.W. (2014). Reversible Markov Processes. In: An Introduction to Markov Processes. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol 230. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40523-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics