Abstract
This study examines the work of usability specialists in a multiparty research project producing an open source learning application for children, with children. Children as a user group has been acknowledged decades ago and methods for involving them have been devised, but there is a lack of research examining what happens to children’s input in practice, when integrated with actual development. The paper contrasts the empirical findings with the existing research on the usability specialists’ roles and with the knowledge management literature on boundary spanning, which argues that for successful knowledge sharing and arriving at shared understandings there needs to emerge boundary spanners and boundary objects and a new joint field of practice within which the experts involved can collaborate. This paper argues for the boundary spanner position to be acquired by usability specialists. Instances of successful boundary spanning are described and conditions for successful boundary spanning are discussed.
Chapter PDF
References
Barcellini, F., Detienne, F., Burkhardt, J.: Participation in online interaction spaces: Design-use mediation in an Open Source Software community. International Journal of In-dustrial Ergonomics 39, 533–540 (2009)
Bloomer, S., Croft, R.: Pitching Usability to Your Organization. Interactions 4(6), 18–26 (1997)
Boivie, I., Gulliksen, J., Göransson, B.: The lonesome cowboy: A study of the usability designer role in systems development. Interacting with Computers 18(4), 601–634 (2006)
Borgholm, T., Madsen, K.: Cooperative Usability Practices. Communications of the ACM 42(5), 91–97 (1999)
Boujut, J., Blanco, E.: Intermediary Objects as a Means to Foster Co-operation in Engineering Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2, 205–219 (2003)
Bygstad, B., Ghinea, G., Brevik, E.: Software development methods and usability: Perspectives from a survey in the software industry in Norway. Interacting with Computers 20(3), 375–385 (2008)
Bødker, S., Buur, J.: The Design Collaboratorium – a Place for Usability Design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 9(2), 152–169 (2002)
Cooper, A.: The inmates are running the asylum: Why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. Sams, Indianapolis (1999)
Cooper, C., Bowers, J.: Representing the users: Notes on the disciplinary rhetoric of human-computer interaction. In: Thomas, P. (ed.) The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces, pp. 48–66. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)
Druin, A.: The Role of Children in the Design of New Technology. Behaviour and Information Technology 21(1), 1–25 (2002)
Druin, A., Stewart, J., Proft, D., Bederson, B., Hollan, J.: KidPad: a design collaboration between children, technologists, and educators. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 463–470. ACM, New York (1997)
Følstad, A., Bark, I., Gulliksen, J.: How HCI-practitioners want to evaluate their own practice. In: Morch, A., Morgan, K., Bratteig, T., Ghosh, G., Svanaes, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth Nordic Conference on Human Computer Interaction, pp. 417–420. ACM, New York (2006)
Gulliksen, J., Boivie, I., Göransson, B.: Usability professionals – current practices and future development. Interacting with Computers 18(4), 568–600 (2006)
Hornbæk, K., Frøkjær, E.: Comparing usability problems and redesign proposals as input to practical systems development. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 391–400. ACM, New York (2005)
Iivari, N.: Understanding the Work of an HCI Practitioner. In: Morch, A., Morgan, K., Bratteig, T., Ghosh, G., Svanaes, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth Nordic Conference on Human Computer Interaction, pp. 185–194. ACM, New York (2006)
Iivari, N.: Culturally Compatible Usability Work - An Interpretive Case Study on the Rela-tionship between Usability Work and Its Cultural Context in Software Product Development Organizations. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 22(3), 40–65 (2010)
Iivari, N., Karasti, H., Molin-Juustila, T., Salmela, S., Syrjänen, A.—L., Halkola, E.: Mediation between design and use – revisiting five empirical studies. Human IT – Journal for Information Technology Studies as a Human Science 10(2), 81–126 (2009)
Klein, H., Myers, M.: A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 23(1), 67–94 (1999)
Lawrence, K.: Walking the Tightrope: The Balancing Acts of a Large e-Research Project. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 15(4), 385–411 (2006)
Lee, C.: Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 16(3), 307–339 (2007)
Levina, N.: Collaborating on Multiparty Information Systems Development Projects: A collective Reflection-in-Action View. Information Systems Research 16(2), 109–130 (2006)
Levina, N., Vaast, E.: The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 29(2), 335–363 (2005)
Mark, G., Lyytinen, K., Bergman, M.: Boundary Objects in Design: An Ecological View of Design Artifacts. Journal of Association for Information Systems 8(11), 546–568 (2007)
Markopoulos, P., Read, J., MacFarlane, S., Höysniemi, J.: Evaluating Children’s Interac-tive Products: Principles and Practices for Interaction Designers. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2008)
Mayhew, D.: The usability engineering lifecycle: A practitioner’s handbook for user interface design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Francisco (1999)
Nichols, D., Twidale, M.: Usability Processes in Open Source Projects. Software Process Improvement and Practice 11, 149–162 (2006)
Rajanen, M., Iivari, N., Anttila, K.: Introducing Usability Activities into Open Source Software Development Projects – Searching for a Suitable Approach. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 12(4), 5–26 (2011)
Rosenbaum, S., Rohn, J., Humburg, J.: A Toolkit for Strategic Usability: Results from Workshops, Panels, and Surveys. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 337–344. ACM, New York (2000)
Star, S., Griesemer, J.: Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Ama-teurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 19, 387–420 (1989)
Tuovila, S., Iivari, N.: Bridge Builders in IT Artifact Development. In: Österle, H., Schelp, J., Winter, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems, pp. 819–830 (2007)
Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 4(2), 74–81 (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Iivari, N. (2013). Usability Specialists as Boundary Spanners – An Appraisal of Usability Specialists’ Work in Multiparty Distributed Open Source Software Development Effort. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013. INTERACT 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8118. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40480-1_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40480-1_40
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40479-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40480-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)