Advertisement

Avalanche! Reanimating Multiple Roles in Child Computer Interaction Design

  • Timo Göttel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8119)

Abstract

This paper values children as design partners in Child Computer Interaction to ensure building environments highly suitable for the target group. However, it appears beneficial to address underlying roles, align design processes on school activities or give considerations to the voluntary nature of such projects. We conducted eight projects with 75 pupils using initial learning environments. We found that starting design processes with pupils as users helps to identify further design steps that can be consequently tackled with the former users as informants and design partners. Thus, we suggest the Avalanche Design Cycle to engage children as fresh users at several stages asking them to become informants and design partners consecutively. The Avalanche Design Cycle is an iterative design process complying with school life allowing pupils to join/leave design teams. Thereby, it is aiming at sustained team sizes and more representative groups.

Keywords

Child-centered design users informants design partners 

References

  1. 1.
    Adlin, T., Pruitt, J.: The Essential Persona Lifecycle: Your Guide to Building and Using Personas. Morgan Kaufmann (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antle, A.N.: Child-Based Personas: Need, Ability and Experience. Cognition, Technology and Work 10(2), 155–166 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Druin, A.: The Role of Children in the Design of New Technology. Behaviour & Information Technology 21(1), 1–25 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Göttel, T.: Virtual Sandbox: Adding Groupware Abilities to Scratch. In: 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 158–161. ACM, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harel, I.: Children Designers: Interdisciplinary Constructions for Learning and Knowing Mathematics in a Computer-Rich School. Ablex Publishing (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Horton, M., Read, J.C., Mazzone, E., Sim, G., Fitton, F.: School Friendly Participatory Research Activities with Children. In: CHI 2012 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2099–2104. ACM, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kelly, S.R., Mazzone, E., Horton, M., Read, J.C.: Bluebells: a Design Method for Child-Centred Product Development. In: 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 361–368. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laughnan, J.: The Organization of Inventing and Prototyping Activities with Children as Design Partners. In: 2004 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 127–128. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moraveji, N., Li, J., Ding, J., O’Kelley, P., Woolf, S.: Comicboarding: Using Comics as Proxies for Participatory Design with Children. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1371–1374. ACM, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nielsen, J.: Paper Versus Computer Implementations as Mockup Scenarios for Heuristic Evaluation. In: IFIP TC13 3rd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 315–320. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam (1990)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Resnick, M.: Sowing the Seeds for a More Creative Society. Learning & Leading with Technology, 18–22 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roussou, M., Kavalieratou, E., Doulgeridis, M.: Children Designers in the Museum: Applying Participatory Design for the Development of an Art Education Program. In: 6th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 77–80. ACM, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scaife, M., Rogers, Y., Aldrich, F., Davies, M.: Designing for or Designing With? Informant Design for Interactive Learning Environments. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 343–350. ACM, New York (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yarosh, S., Radu, I., Hunter, S., Rosenbaum, E.: Examining Values: an Analysis of Nine Years of IDC Research. In: 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 136–144. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timo Göttel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations