Advertisement

Perceptions of Facebook Privacy and Career Impression Management

  • Danielle Pilcer
  • Andrew Thatcher
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8119)

Abstract

Facebook was initially designed as a social tool representing a person’s social life, yet today it functions as a platform synthesizing all facets of life, including the work context. Within the frame of the social capital theory, a survey was conducted measuring Facebook users’ experience, perceptions of privacy and career impression management. Results found that higher Facebook experience was related to increased levels of trust and career impression management in terms of self- monitoring and work relations. Higher work privacy was related to career impression management in terms of lower work relations and higher perceived workplace outcomes; and career impression management in terms of higher perceived self-monitoring and workplace outcomes were related to lower levels of privacy awareness. It was concluded that how one uses Facebook and one’s perceived value in presenting an image of an employable person is influenced by how one views their Facebook privacy.

Keywords

Facebook privacy impression management employability social capital theory 

References

  1. 1.
    Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C.: The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social Capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication 12, 1143–1168 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith, W.P., Kidder, D.L.: You’ve been tagged (Then again, maybe not): Employers and Facebook. Business Horizons 53, 491–499 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosenfeld, P., Booth- Kewley, S., Edwards, J.E.: Responses on computer surveys: Impression management, social desirability, Big Brother Syndrome. Computers in Human Behaviour 12, 263–274 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buys, L., Bow, V.: The impact of privacy on social capital. In: Proceedings on the Social Change in the 21st Century Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mehdizadeh, S.: Self- presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self- esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour and Social Networking 13, 357–364 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foucault, M.: Discipline and Punish. Pantheon, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dunn, H.B.: Facebook and other social networking sites: Candy-coating surveillance. Comm-entary: The University of New Hampshire Student Journal of Communication, 86–94 (2009), http://www.unh.edu/communication/media/pdf/commentary/spring09.pdf#page=89 (retrieved April 25, 2011)
  8. 8.
    Boyd, D.: Facebook’s Privacy Trainwreck: Exposure, invasion, and social convergence. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14, 13–20 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rosenberg, J., Egbert, N.: Online impression management: Personality traits and concerns for secondary goals as predictors of self- presentation tactics on Facebook. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication 17, 1–18 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barash, V., Ducheneaut, N., Isaacs, E., Bellotti, V.: Faceplant: Impression (Mis)management in Facebook Status Updates. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goffman, E.: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, New York (1959/1990)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J.P., Horn, A.K., Hughes, B.N.: Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, behaviours, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication 15, 83–108 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boyd, D.M., Ellison, N.B.: Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication 13, 210–230 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, Y., Gummadi, K.P., Krishnamurthy, B., Mislove, A.: Analysing Facebook privacy settings: User expectations vs. reality (2011), http://conferences.sigcomm.org/imc/2011/docs/p61.pdf (retrieved October 12, 2011)
  15. 15.
    Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S.R., Passerini, K.: Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace. In: Proceedings at the Thirteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems. Colorado, Keystone (2007), http://csis.pace.edu/~dwyer/research/DwyerAMCIS2007.pdf (retrieved April 25, 2011)
  16. 16.
    Cronbach, L.J.: Essential s of psychological testing. Harper and Row Publishers, New York (1984)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danielle Pilcer
    • 1
  • Andrew Thatcher
    • 1
  1. 1.Industrial PsychologyUniversity of WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations