Linetic: Technical, Usability and Aesthetic Implications of a Ferrofluid-Based Organic User Interface

  • Jeffrey Tzu Kwan Valino Koh
  • Kasun Karunanayaka
  • Ryohei Nakatsu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8119)


We present an OUI that combines Hall Effect sensing and actuation through electromagnetically-manipulated ferrofluid. The movement of magnets worn on the fingertips, over a surface embedded with a Hall Effect sensor array and electromagnets, gives the user the ability to interact with ferrofluid. This system provides a three-dimensional, physically animated response, as well as three-dimensional, spatial-sensing inputs. The vibration of the magnets worn on the fingertips, produced by the repulsing polarity of the electromagnets, provides the user with haptic feedback. Linetic is a multimodal interface with a visual, audio and haptic experience. In this manuscript we explain the overall system from a technical, usability and aesthetic viewpoint by outlining significant experiments conducted that contribute to the development of the system. Furthermore we discuss the philosophical and aesthetical implications of the Linetic system, as well as characterize Linetic’s disposition to Analogness or Digitalness.


Electromagnetic haptic TUI OUI morphable shape changing 


  1. 1.
    Bailly, G., Vo, D.B., Lecolinet, E., Guiard, Y.: Gesture-aware remote controls: guidelines and interaction technique. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, ICMI 2011, pp. 263–270. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coelho, M., Maes, P.: Sprout I / O: A Texturally Rich Interface, pp. 221–222. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dewey, J.: Art as experience, vol. 12. Perigee (1934)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dunne, A.: Hertzian Tales. Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design, vol. 2. RCA Computer Related Design Research (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fels, S.: Intimacy and Embodiment: Implications for art and technology. In: Computer Engineering, pp. 13–16 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frey, M.: Snoil. a physical display based on ferrofluid (2006), (accessed August 18, 2011)
  7. 7.
    Gerhardt, T.: Mud tub (2009), (accessed August 18, 2011)
  8. 8.
    Holman, D., Vertegaal, R.: Organic user interfaces: designing computers in any way, shape, or form. Communications of the ACM 51, 4855 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ishii, H.: Tangible bits: designing the seamless interface between people, bits, and atoms, p. 3. ACMGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ishii, H.: The tangible user interface and its evolution. Communications of the ACM 51, 32 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jansen, Y.: Mudpad: Fluid haptics for multitouch surfaces. In: Human Factors, pp. 4351–4356 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khaslavsky, S.N.: Understanding the seductive experience. Communications of the ACM 42, 45–49 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kodama, S.: Dynamic ferrofluid sculpture. Communications of the ACM 51, 79 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Valino Koh, J., Karunanayaka, K., Sepulveda, J., Tharakan, M., Krishnan, M., et al.: Liquid interface: a malleable, transient, direct-touch interface. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, ACE 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koh, J.T.K.V., Peiris, R.L., Zhu, K., Polydorou, D., Nakatsu, R.: Uncovering analogness and digitalness in interactive media. In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, SIGDOC 2012, pp. 233–242. ACM, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Korsmeyer: Picard, R.W.: affective computing, Minds and Machines, 9 (1999)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Locher, P., Overbeeke, K., Wensveen, S.: A framework for aesthetic experience. In: Advances, pp. 9–12 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Petersen, M.G., Iversen, O.S., Krogh, P.G., Ludvigsen, M.: Aesthetic interaction. ACM Press (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pier, M.D., Goldberg, I.R.: Using water as interface media in vr applications. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, CLIHC 2005, pp. 162–169. ACM, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schwesig, C.: What makes an interface feel organic? Communications of the ACM 51, 67 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shusterman, R.: Pragmatist aesthetics; living beauty, rethinking art, vol. 50. Blackwell (1992)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vertegaal, R., Poupyrev, I.: Introduction (special section on organic user interfaces). Communications of the ACM 51, 26–30 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wakita, A., Nakano, A., Kobayashi, N.: Programmable blobs. ACM Press (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century, Humancomputer interaction: toward the year 2000, pp. 933–940 (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey Tzu Kwan Valino Koh
    • 1
  • Kasun Karunanayaka
    • 1
  • Ryohei Nakatsu
    • 1
  1. 1.Keio NUS CUTE Center, Interactive and Digital Media InstituteNational University of SingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations