Abstract
Prostate cancer statistics and ambivalence about screening challenge our profession to enlarge our array of clinical practices in order to better serve patients’ needs. The diagnostic and treatment conventions that dominated urologic practice at the turn of the millennium are rapidly evolving toward an image-guided target-and-manage approach to the disease. Advances in imaging coupled with biomarkers enable more informed decisions about the timing and utilization of diagnostic and treatment interventions. In addition to advanced imaging technologies, complementary and alternative medicine also offer hope for preventing, managing, and overcoming prostate cancer. The overall statistics for prostate cancer challenge our profession to serve patients’ needs by enlarging our array of clinical choices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2012. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2012.
Amling CL, Blute ML, Lerner SE, Bergstralh EJ, Bostwick DG, Zincke H. Influence of prostate-specific antigen testing on the spectrum of patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy at a large referral practice. Mayo Clin Proc. 1998;73(5):401–6.
Bard R. DCE-MRI of prostate cancer. Berlin: Springer; 2009. p. 88.
Bott SR, Ahmed HU, Hindley RG, Abdul-Rahman A, Freeman A, Emberton M. The index lesion and focal therapy: an analysis of the pathological characteristics of prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2010;106(11):1607–11.
Carroll P and Shinohara K. Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy. UCSF Patient Guide 2008 http://urology2008-2012.ucsf.edu/patientGuides/pdf/uroOnc/Prostate_Biopsy.pdf
Ewing J. Neoplastic diseases: a textbook on tumors. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1940. p. 844.
Hakama M, Auvinen A. Cancer screening. In: Heggenhougen K, Quah SR, editors. International encyclopedia of public health. San Diego: Academic; 2008. p. 464–80.
Hess D. Evaluating alternative cancer therapies. Edited collection of interviews of leaders of the CAM cancer therapy movement. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 1999.
Klotz L. Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention is the way to manage ‘good-risk’ prostate cancer. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2005;2(3):136–42; quiz 131 p following 149.
Lepor H. Is targeted minimally invasive therapies (MIAT) ready for prime time? Presented In: Advances in prostate imaging and focal ablative treatment of prostate cancer conference, New York, University Langone Medical Center; 2013.
Li J, Djenaba J, et al. Recent trends in prostate cancer incidence by age, cancer stage, and grade, the United States, 2001–2007. Prostate Cancer. 2012. Article ID 691380, 8 pages. doi:10.1155/2012/691380.
Martin RM, Gunnell D, Hamdy F, Neal D, Lane A, Donovan J. Continuing controversy over monitoring men with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of programs in the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol. 2006;176(2):439–49.
Mearini L, Porena M. Pros and cons of focal therapy for localized prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer. 2011. Article ID 584784, 8 pages. doi:10.1155/2011/584784.
Prostate Cancer Foundation. Eliminating cancer as a cause of death by 2015. Panel discussion presented during the 2004 Global Conference; Los Angeles, CA: 2004.
Racioppi M, Palermo G, et al. Hot topics in urological health economics: a mini review. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2012;84(2):47–52.
Sauvain J, Sauvain E, Rohmer P, et al. Role of Doppler ultrasound in detection of low risk prostate cancers. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2013;94:60.
Schröder F, Hugosson J, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1320–8.
Scosyrev E, Messing EM. Reply to prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer and the risk of overt metastatic disease at presentation: analysis of trends over time. Cancer. 2013;119(5):1113–4.
Stamey TA, Freiha FS, McNeal JE, Redwine EA, Whittemore AS, Schmid HP. Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer. Cancer. 1993;71(3 Suppl):933–8.
Walsh PC. The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer [ed. comment]. J Urol. 2004;171:506–7.
Wei JT, Dunn RL, Sandler HM, et al. Comprehensive comparison of health-related quality of life after contemporary therapies for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(2):557–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bard, R.L. (2014). Current Scope of Prostate Cancer. In: Bard, R., Fütterer, J., Sperling, D. (eds) Image Guided Prostate Cancer Treatments. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40429-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40429-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40428-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40429-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)