Advertisement

A Meta-regulation Approach to Laws to Incorporate CSR Principles in Corporate Self-Regulation

  • Mia Mahmudur Rahim
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

How, and to what extent, legal regulation matters in developing social responsibility in companies are long debated questions. In the corporate regulation landscape, while some legal regulation reformers have argued that the prescriptive mode of regulation has failed to facilitate, reward, or encourage companies to go beyond their profit-centred behaviour, others have argued that relying only on corporate self-regulation is not a viable approach to enable the incorporation of social values in corporate behaviour in the absence of non-legal social drivers. In the context of this dilemma, meta-regulation is a comparatively new regulatory approach that encourages companies to transcend their social responsibilities. Its normative base is built on the arguments of the ‘third perspective’ discussed in the previous chapter of this book. The core of this regulatory approach is the fusion of the responsive and reflexive modes of regulation to merge the patterns of private ordering and state control in contemporary corporate regulation. This chapter describes this approach to assist legal regulation to ensure social values are accepted as a central corporate responsibility from the perspective of a weak economy.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Social Responsibility Corporate Governance Regulatory Approach Reflexive Mode 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aguilera RV (2005) Corporate governance and director accountability: an institutional comparative perspective. Br J Manag 16:39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Van An D (2006) Building institutions for a market economy with socialist orientation in Vietnam. Vietnam Econ Manag Rev 1:10Google Scholar
  3. Baden DA, Harwood I, Woodward DG (2009) The effect of buyer pressure on suppliers in Smes to demonstrate CSR practices: an added incentive or counter productive? Eur Manag J 27(6):429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin R (2004) The new punitive regulation. Mod Law Rev 67(3):351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldwin R, Black J (2008) Really responsive regulation. Mod Law Rev 71(1)Google Scholar
  6. Barratt R, Korac-Kakabadse N (2002) Developing reflexive corporate leadership: the role of the non executive director. Corp Gov 2(3):32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Black J (1996) Constitutionalising self regulation. Mod Law Rev 59(1):24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Black J (2002a) Critical reflections on regulation. Aust J Leg Philos 27:1Google Scholar
  9. Black J (2005) The emergence of risk-based regulation and the new public risk management in the United Kingdom. Public Law 3:512Google Scholar
  10. Blackett A (2000) Global governance, legal pluralism and the decentered state: a labor law critique of codes of corporate conduct. Indiana J Glob Leg Study 8:401Google Scholar
  11. Braithwaite J (2003a) Meta risk management and responsive regulation for tax system integrity. Law Policy 25(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Braithwaite J (2006) Responsive regulation and developing economies. World Dev 34(5):884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Braithwaite V (2007) Responsive regulation and taxation: introduction. Law Policy 29(1):3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Braithwaite V, Murphy K, Reinhart M (2007) Taxation threat, motivational postures, and responsive regulation. Law Policy 29(1):137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bruyn ST (1999) The moral economy. Rev Soc Econ 57(1)Google Scholar
  16. Buhmann K (2006) Corporate social responsibility: what role for law? Some aspects of law and CSR. Corp Gov 6(2):188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burchell G, Gordon C, Millerburchell P (1991) The foucault effect: studies in governmentalityGoogle Scholar
  18. Cable S, Benson M (1993) Acting locally: environmental injustice and the emergence of grass-roots environmental organizations. Soc Probl 40(4):464–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Calliess GP (2001) Lex mercatoria: a reflexive law guide to an autonomous legal system. Ger Law J 2:17Google Scholar
  20. Canellos PC, Kleinbard E (2002) Disclosing book-tax differences. Tax Notes 96:999Google Scholar
  21. Carrier C (2002) Intrapreneurship in large firms and Smes. Enterp Crit Perspect Bus Manag 12(3):392Google Scholar
  22. Coglianese C, Lazer D (2003) Management based regulation: prescribing private management to achieve public goals. Law Soc Rev 37(4):691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Conley JM, Williams C (2005) Engage, embed, and embellish: theory versus practice in the corporate social responsibility movement. J Corp Law 31:1Google Scholar
  24. Crumplar TC (1975) An alternative to public and victim enforcement of the federal securities and antitrust laws: citizen enforcement. Harv J Legis 13:76Google Scholar
  25. Cunningham LA (2003) The appeal and limits of internal controls to fight fraud, terrorism, other ills. J Corp Law 29:267Google Scholar
  26. De Schutter O (2004) The implementation of fundamental rights through the open method of coordination. Social rights and market forces: is the open coordination of employment and social policies the future of social Europe 279Google Scholar
  27. Deakin S (1999) Two types of regulatory competition: competitive federalism versus reflexive harmonisation. A law and economics perspective on centros. Camb Yearbook Eur Legal Stud 2:231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dee W (1999) The goldberg test for compliance: opening the key performance indicators debate compliance solutions, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  29. Edelman LB et al (1991) Legal ambiguity and the politics of compliance: affirmative action officers’ dilemma. Law Policy 13(1)Google Scholar
  30. Fiorino DJ (1999) Rethinking environmental regulation: perspectives on law and governance. Harv Environ Law Rev 23(2):441Google Scholar
  31. Francis R, Armstrong A (2003) Ethics as a risk management strategy: the Australian experience. J Bus Ethics 45(4):375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gaines SE (2002a) Reflexive law as a legal paradigm for sustainable development. Buffalo Environ Law J 10:1Google Scholar
  33. Gainsford L (2004) The Australian competition and consumer commission’s proposed industry codes of conduct-a compliance solution? J Law Fin Manag 3:2Google Scholar
  34. Goodpaster K (1983) The concept of corporate responsibility. J Bus Ethics 2(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grabosky PN (1995) Using non governmental resources to foster regulatory compliance. Governance 8(4):527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gunningham N (1995) Environment, self-regulation, and the chemical industry: assessing responsible care. Law Policy 17(1):57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gunningham N (2002a) Regulating small and medium sized enterprises. J Environ Law 14(1):3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gunningham N, Thornton D, Kagan RA (2005) Motivating management: corporate compliance in environmental protection. Law Policy 27(2):289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Haigh M (2006) Managed investments, managed disclosures: financial services reform in practice. Account Audit Account J 19(2):186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Haines F, Gurney D (2003) The shadows of the law: contemporary approaches to regulation and the problem of regulatory conflict. Law Policy 25(4)Google Scholar
  41. Hassel L, Nilsson H, Nyquist S (2005) The value relevance of environmental performance. Eur Account Rev 14(1):41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hawkins K, Hutter BM (1993) The response of business to social regulation in England and Wales: an enforcement perspective. Law Policy 15(3):199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heydebrand W (2003) Process rationality as legal governance: a comparative perspective. Int Soc 18(2):325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Heyesa A, Rickman N (1999) Regulatory dealing-revisiting the Harrington paradox. J Public Econ 72(3):361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hill JG (2003) Corporate criminal liability in Australia: an evolving corporate governance technique?. J Bus LawGoogle Scholar
  46. Holgaard JE, Jørgensen TH (2005) A decade of mandatory environmental reporting in Denmark. Eur Environ 15(6):362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jordana J, Levi-Faur D (2004) The politics of regulation in the age of governance politics of regulation: institutions and regulatory reforms for the age of governance 1Google Scholar
  48. Kagan RA, Scholz JT (1984) The criminology of the corporation and regulatory enforcement strategies. Enforc Regul 67Google Scholar
  49. Karagiannis D, Mylopoulos J, Schwab M (2007) Business process-based regulation compliance: the case of the sarbanes-oxley actGoogle Scholar
  50. King A, Lenox M (2000) Industry self-regulation without sanctions: the chemical industry’s responsible care program. Acad Manage J 43(4):698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Krawiec KD (2003) Cosmetic compliance and the failure of negotiated governance. Wash Univ Law Q 81:487Google Scholar
  52. Krawiec KD (2005) Organizational misconduct: beyond the principal-agent model. Florida State Univ Law Rev 32Google Scholar
  53. Latimer P (2003) Reporting suspicions of money laundering and ‘Whistleblowing’: the legal and other implications for intermediaries and their advisers. J Finan Crime 10(1):23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Liefferink D, Andersen MS (2001) Strategies of the ‘green’ member states in EU environmental policy-making. J Eur Public Policy 5(2):254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lim, Suk Jun and Phillips, Joe (2008) Embedding CSR Values: The Global Footwear industry’s Evolving Governance Structure (2008) 81(1) Journal of Business Ethics 143Google Scholar
  56. Lindquist SA (2003) Developments in federal whistleblower protection laws. Rev Public Pers Admin 23(1):78Google Scholar
  57. Makkai T, Braithwaite J (1994) The dialectics of corporate deterrence. J Res Crime Delinq 31(4):347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mascini P, Van Wijk E (2009) Responsive regulation at the Dutch food and consumer product safety authority: an empirical assessment of assumptions underlying the theory. Regul Gov 3(1):27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mcadam R, Reid R (2001) SME and large organisation perceptions of knowledge management: comparisons and contrasts. J Knowl Manag 5(3):231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mcdonald F. (2010) Patient safety law: regulatory change in Britain and CanadaGoogle Scholar
  61. Mckay S (2001) Between flexibility and regulation: rights, equality and protection at work. Br J Indust Res 39(2):285Google Scholar
  62. Melissaris E (2004) The more the merrier? A new take on legal pluralism. Soc Legal Stud 13(1):57Google Scholar
  63. Moon J, Crane A, Matten D (2005) Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Bus Ethics Q 15(3):429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Morgan B (2003a) The economization of politics: meta-regulation as a form of non-judicial legality. Soc Legal Stud 12(4):490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Murphy DE (2001) Federal sentencing guidelines for organizations: a decade of promoting compliance and ethics, the. Iowa Law Rev 87:697Google Scholar
  66. Nanton P (1995) Extending the boundaries: equal opportunities as social regulation Policy Polit 23(3) 203Google Scholar
  67. Parashar A (2008) Re-conceptualizing regulation, responsibility and law. Macquarie Law J 8:59Google Scholar
  68. Parker C (1999a) Compliance professionalism and regulatory community: the Australian trade practices regime. J Law Soc 26(2):215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Parker C (2008) The pluralization of regulation. Theor Inq in Law 9Google Scholar
  70. Parker C, Conolly O (2002) Is there a duty to implement a corporate compliance system in Australian law?. Aust Bus Law Rev 30(4)Google Scholar
  71. Parker C, Nielson VL (2006) Do businesses take compliance systems seriously-an empirical study of the implementation of trade practices compliance systems in Australia. Melbourne Univ Law Rev 30(2):441Google Scholar
  72. Pascoe J, Welsh M (2011) Whistle-blowing, ethics and corporate culture: theory and practice in Australia. Common Law World Rev 1Google Scholar
  73. Radaelli CM (2007) Towards better research on better regulationGoogle Scholar
  74. Rahim MM (2011) Meta-regulation approach of law: a potential legal strategy to develop socially responsible business self-regulation in least developed common law countries. Common Law World Rev 40(2):174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rose N, Miller P (2010) Political power beyond the state: problematic of government. Br J Sociol 61(S1):271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rosen RE (2002) Risk management and corporate governance: the case of Enron. Connect Law Rev 35:1157Google Scholar
  77. Rosen RE (2005) Resistances to reforming corporate governance: the diffusion of Qlccs. Fordham Law Rev 74:1251Google Scholar
  78. Jones SC (1992) Nat Law J 14(50):18Google Scholar
  79. Scheuerman WE (2001) Reflexive law and the challenges of globalization. J Polit Philos 9(1):81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Scott C (2004) Regulation in the age of governance: the rise of the post-regulatory state. Polit Regul Inst Regul Reforms Age Govern 145Google Scholar
  81. Shachar A (2008) Privatizing diversity: a cautionary tale from religious arbitration in family law. Theoretical Inq Law 9(2):11Google Scholar
  82. Shamir R (2008) The age of responsibilization: on market-embedded morality. Econ Soc 37(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Shapiro SA, Rabinowitz R (2000) Voluntary regulatory compliance in theory and practice: the case of OSHA. Admin Law Rev 52:97Google Scholar
  84. Shleifer A (2005) Understanding regulation. Eur Finan Manag 11(4):439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sims TS (2002) Corporate returns: beyond disclosure. Taxus Notes 29:735Google Scholar
  86. Smith B (2006) Not the baby and the babywater: regulatory reform for equality laws to address work-family conflict. Sydney Law Rev 28:689Google Scholar
  87. Stratton S (2002) Closing the credibility gap by disclosing corporate returns. Insur Tax Rev 23:220Google Scholar
  88. Swanson DL (1999) Toward an integrative theory of business and society: a research strategy for corporate social performance. Acad Manage Rev 24(3):506Google Scholar
  89. Tamanha B (2000) A non essentialist version of legal pluralism. J Law Soc 27(2):296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Teubner G (1982) Substantive and reflexive elements in modern law. Law Soc Rev 17Google Scholar
  91. Tilley F (1999) The gap between the environmental attitudes and the environmental behaviour of small firms. Bus Strategy Environ 8(4):238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Walke D (2007) Business registration in Vietnam: burden or opportunity. Spring Vietnam Econ Manag Rev (2) 3Google Scholar
  93. Warhurst A (2005) Future roles of business in society: the expanding boundaries of corporate responsibility and a compelling case for partnership. Futures 37(2–3):151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Weaver GR, Trevino LK, Cochran PL (1999) Corporate ethics practices in the mid-1990s: an empirical study of the fortune 1000. J Bus Ethics 18(3):283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Yapp C, Fairman R (2005) Assessing compliance with food safety legislation in small businesses. Br Food J 107(3):150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Gutiérrez R, Jones A (2004) Effects of corporate social responsibility in latin American communities: a comparison of experiences <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1018680> 27 Mar 2011
  97. Administration National Academy of Public (1997) Resolving the paradox of environmental protection: an agenda for congress, EPA and the states: a report for congressGoogle Scholar
  98. Anheier HK (2004) The third sector in Europe: five theses, strategy mix for nonprofit organisations: vehicles for social and labour market integrationsGoogle Scholar
  99. Australia Standards (2002) Standards and standardisationGoogle Scholar
  100. Ayres I, Braithwaite J (1995) Responsive regulation: transcending the deregulation debateGoogle Scholar
  101. Baldwin R, Cave M (1999) Understanding regulation: theory, strategy and practiceGoogle Scholar
  102. Baldwin R, Scott C, Hood CA (1998) Reader on regulationGoogle Scholar
  103. Bardach E, Kagan R (1982) Going by the book: the problem of regulatory unreasonablenessGoogle Scholar
  104. Barnard C, Deakin S, Hobbs R (2005) Reflexive law, corporate social responsibility and the evolution of labour standards: the case of working time, social rights and market forces: is open coordination the future for European employment and social policyGoogle Scholar
  105. Barnard C, Deakin S, Hobbs R (2003) The use and necessity of the article 18(1)(B)(I) of the working time directive in the United Kingdom. Report for the Eur CommGoogle Scholar
  106. Beder SB (1997) Global spin: the corporate assault on environmentalismGoogle Scholar
  107. Braithwaite J (1985) To punish or persuade: enforcement of coal mine safetyGoogle Scholar
  108. Brunsson N, Jacobsson B (2000) A world of standardsGoogle Scholar
  109. Crane A, Matten D (2007) Business ethics: managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalizationGoogle Scholar
  110. Ericson RC, Doyle A, Barry D (2003) Insurance as governanceGoogle Scholar
  111. Fisse B, Braithwaite J (1983) The impact of publicity on corporate offendersGoogle Scholar
  112. Freeman E (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approachGoogle Scholar
  113. Gonzalez JL (2004) Corporation-community collaboration for social development: an overview of trends, challenges, and lessons from Asia, corporate social responsibility in the promotion of social development: experiences from Asia and Latin AmericaGoogle Scholar
  114. Gunningham N, Johnstone R (1999) Regulating workplace safety: system and sanctionsGoogle Scholar
  115. Habermas J (1998) Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracyGoogle Scholar
  116. Haines F (1997) Corporate regulation: beyond“ Punish or Persuade”Google Scholar
  117. Hawkins K (1984) Environment and enforcement: regulation and the social definition of pollutionGoogle Scholar
  118. Henry S (1983) Private justice: towards integrated theorising in the sociology of lawGoogle Scholar
  119. Hopkins A (1995) Making safety work: getting management commitment to occupational health and safetyGoogle Scholar
  120. Hutter BM (1997) Compliance: regulation and environmentGoogle Scholar
  121. Nonet P, Selznick P, Kagan RA (2001) Law & society in transition: toward responsive lawGoogle Scholar
  122. Ogus AI (1994) Regulation: legal form and economic theoryGoogle Scholar
  123. Parker C (2002) Is there a reliable way to evaluate organisational compliance programs? Regulation: enforcement and complianceGoogle Scholar
  124. Rogowski R, Wilthagen T (1994) Reflexive labour law: an introduction, reflexive labour lawGoogle Scholar
  125. Rose N (1999) Powers of freedomGoogle Scholar
  126. Santos BDeS (1995) Toward a new common sense: law, science and politics in the paradigmatic transitionGoogle Scholar
  127. Selznick P (2002) The communitarian persuasionGoogle Scholar
  128. Selznick P (1985) Focusing organizational research on regulation, regulatory policy and the social sciencesGoogle Scholar
  129. Selznick P (1994) The moral commonwealth: social theory and the promise of communityGoogle Scholar
  130. Smismans S (2004) Reflexive law in support of directly deliberative polyarchy: reflexive-deliberative polyarchy as a normative frame for the OMC, social rights and market forces: is the open coordination of employment and social policies the future of social EuropeGoogle Scholar
  131. Teubner G (1987) Juridification of social spheresGoogle Scholar
  132. Vermeesch RB et al (1998) Business law of AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  133. Ward H (2004) Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: taking stockGoogle Scholar
  134. Yeager PC (1993) The limits of law: the public regulation of private pollutionGoogle Scholar
  135. Yeung K (2004) Securing compliance: a principled approachGoogle Scholar
  136. Habermas J (1989) Technology and science as ideology. In: Seidman S (Ed), Jürgen Habermas (ed), On society and politics: a readerGoogle Scholar
  137. Parker C (2007) Meta-regulation: legal accountability for corporate social responsibility?. In: Mcbarnet D, Voiculescu A, Campbell T (Eds), The new corporate accountability: corporate social responsibility and the lawGoogle Scholar
  138. Berik G, Rodgers Y, Van Der M (2006) The debate on labour standards and international trade: lessons from Cambodia and Bangladesh (Department of Economics of the University of Utah)Google Scholar
  139. Coglianese C, Nash J (2006) Leveraging the private sector: management-based strategies for improving environmental performance (RPP-06-2004, Center for Business and Government, John F Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University)Google Scholar
  140. Gunnigham N (2004) Beyond compliance: next generation environmental regulation (Australian Institute of Criminology)Google Scholar
  141. Gunningham N. Sinclair D (1997) Barriers and motivators to the adoptation of cleaner production practices (Environment Australia)Google Scholar
  142. Hall A, Johnstone R, Ridgway A (2004) Reflection on reforms: developing criminal accountability for industrial deaths (National Research Center for Occupational Health and Safety, Australian National University)Google Scholar
  143. Hutter BM (2006) The role of non-state actors in regulation (Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation)Google Scholar
  144. Hutter BM, O’Mahony J (2004) Business regulation: reviewing the regulatory potential of civil society organisations (Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science)Google Scholar
  145. Mazerolle L, Ransley J (2004) Third party policing: prospects, challenges and implications for regulators (Australian Institute of Criminology)Google Scholar
  146. Murray J (2004) Corporate social responsibility: an overview of principles and practicesGoogle Scholar
  147. Sa LD (2005) Business registration start-up: a concept note (International Finance Corporation)Google Scholar
  148. Sarre R (2004) The future of policing in a broader regulatory framework (Australian Institute of Criminology)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mia Mahmudur Rahim
    • 1
  1. 1.School of AccountancyQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations