Advertisement

The Theoretical Basis for the Implementation of CSR Principles Through Legal Regulation

  • Mia Mahmudur Rahim
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

There are many ways of examining CSR, although as yet there is no single generally accepted, fully specified concept encompassing its practices. Contemporary scholars of CSR have shown that the voluntary mode of practising CSR is predominant. However, there are opponents of this mode, especially in the weak economies in which the non-legal drivers in society are sparse. In these circumstances, establishing a theoretical basis for implementing CSR through legislation is difficult, but important. It is difficult, since legal regulation could be detrimental to business development if it narrows the scope of innovation in business and becomes a barrier to companies’ usual business practices in the post-regulatory world. It is important, since the public interest groups—who are sceptical of the role of companies’ voluntary responsibility for social development—need a theoretical basis to demonstrate instances of corporate irresponsibility to society in an articulate manner. This chapter presents a detailed discussion of several theories to establish that a normative basis exists for implementing CSR principles through legal regulation.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Business Ethic Social Responsibility Corporate Governance Stakeholder Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alchian AA, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. Am Econ Rev 62(5):777Google Scholar
  2. Allen DS (2001) The first amendment and the doctrine of corporate personhood. Journalism 2(3):255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen WT (1992) Our schizophrenic conception of the business corporation. Cardozo Law Rev 14:261Google Scholar
  4. Ashforth BE, Gibbs BW (1990) The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Org Sci 177Google Scholar
  5. Bainbridge SM (2002) Director primacy: the means and ends of corporate governance. Northwest Univ Law Rev 97:547Google Scholar
  6. Bainbridge SM (1993) In defense of the shareholder wealth maximization norm: a reply to professor Green. Wash Lee Law Rev 50:1423Google Scholar
  7. Belal AR (2002) Stakeholder accountability or stakeholder management: a review of UK firms social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting (SEAAR) practices. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 9(1):8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berle AA (1930) Corporate powers as powers in trust. Harv Law Rev 44:1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berle AA (1931) For whom corporate managers are trustees: a note. Harard Law Rev 45:1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blair M, Stout L (2001a) Director accountability and the mediating role of the corporate board. Wash Univ Law Q 79:403Google Scholar
  11. Blair MM, Stout LA (1999) A team production theory of corporate law. Va L Rev 85(2):247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bradley M et al (1999) The purposes and accountability of the corporation in contemporary society: corporate governance at a crossroads. Law Contemp Probl 62:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Butler HN (1988) The contractual theory of the corporation. George Mason Univ Law Revies 11:99Google Scholar
  14. Campbell DJ (2000) Legitimacy theory or managerial reality construction? Corporate social disclosure in Marks and Spencer Plc corporate reports, 1969–1997. Account Forum 24(1):80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coase R (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3(1)Google Scholar
  16. Coglianese C, Lazer D (2003) Management based regulation: prescribing private management to achieve public goals. Law Soc Rev 37(4):691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Conley JM, Williams C (2005) Engage, embed, and embellish: theory versus practice in the corporate social responsibility movement. J Corp Law 31:1Google Scholar
  18. Dawson S (2004) Balancing self interest and altruism: corporate governance alone is not enough. Corp Gov Int Rev 12(2):130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deegan C (2002) The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–a theoretical foundation. Account Audit Account J 15(3):282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deegan C, Rankin M, Tobin J (2002) An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983–1997: a test of legitimacy theory. Account Audit Account J 15(3):312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deegan C, Rankin M, Voght P (2000) Firms’ disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence. Account Forum 24(1):101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dodd EM (1932) For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harv Law Rev 45(7):1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dodd EM (1935) Is effective enforcement of the fiduciary duties of corporate managers practicable? Univ Chic Law Rev 194Google Scholar
  24. Dorf M, Sabel CF (1998) A constitution of democratic experimentalism. C Law Rev 98(2):267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dorf MC (2004) After bureaucracy. Univ Chic Law Rev 1245Google Scholar
  26. Dowling J, Pfeffer J (1975) Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior. Pac Sociol Rev 122Google Scholar
  27. Dryzek JS (1999) Transnational democracy. J Polit Philos 7(1):30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eisenberg A (1982) The modernization of corporate law: an essay for bill cary. Univ Miami Law Rev 37:187Google Scholar
  29. Eisenberg MA (1998) The conception that the corporation is a nexus of contracts, and the dual nature of the firm. J Corp Law 24:819Google Scholar
  30. Elhauge E (2005) Sacrificing corporate profits in the public interest. N Y Univ Law Rev 80:733Google Scholar
  31. Engelen E (2001) Corporate governance, property and democracy: a conceptual critique of shareholder ideology. Econ Soc 31(3):391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Evan WM, Freeman RE (1993) A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian CapitalismGoogle Scholar
  33. Fama E (1980) Agency problems and the theory of the firm. J Polit Econ 88(2):288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fama E, Jensen M (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J Law Econ 26:301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fergus A, Rowney JIA (2005) Sustainable development: lost meaning and opportunity? J Bus Ethics 60(1)Google Scholar
  36. Fisch J (2005) Measuring efficiency in corporate law: the role of shareholder primacy. J Corp Law 31:637Google Scholar
  37. Freeman EE (1994) The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions. Bus Ethics Q 4(4):409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Freeman J (1997) Collaborative governance in the adminstrative state. Univ Calif Los Angel Law Rev 45Google Scholar
  39. Freeman RE, Wicks A, Parmar B (2004) Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited. Org Sci 15:364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Friedman M (2007) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits corporate ethics and corporate governance 173Google Scholar
  41. Fung A, Rourke DO, Sabel C (2007) Realizing labour standards’ Boston Rev 26Google Scholar
  42. Gill A (2008) Corporate governance as social responsibility: a research agenda. Berkeley J Int Law 26:452Google Scholar
  43. Goodpaster KE, Mathews JB Jr (1982) Can a corporation have a conscience? Harv Bus Rev 60(1):132Google Scholar
  44. Gray R, Kouhy R, Lavers S (1995) Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Account Audit Account J 8(2):47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Greenfield K (2005) New principles for corporate law. Hastings Bus Law J 1:87Google Scholar
  46. Greenfield K (1997) The place of workers in corporate law. Boston Coll Law Rev 39:283Google Scholar
  47. Hansmann H, Kraakman R (2000) The end of history for corporate law. Georgetown Law J 89:439Google Scholar
  48. Harshbarger S, Jois GU (2007) Looking back and looking forward: sarbanes-oxley and the future of corporate governance. Akron Law Rev 40(1):1Google Scholar
  49. Hart SL (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad Manage Rev 20(4):986Google Scholar
  50. Hess D (2007) Social reporting and new governance regulation: the prospects of achieving corporate accountability through transparency. Bus Ethics Quart 17:455Google Scholar
  51. Jensen M (2001) Value maximization, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function. Eur Finan Manag 7(3):297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jensen MC (2002) Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Bus Ethics Q 235Google Scholar
  53. Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Finan Econ 3(4):305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Johnson L (1989) Delaware judiciary and the meaning of corporate life and corporate law. Texas Law Rev 68:865Google Scholar
  55. Johnson L, Millon D (2004) Recalling why corporate officers are fiduciaries. William Mary Law Rev 46:1597Google Scholar
  56. Jones TM, Wicks AC (1999) Convergent stakeholder theory. Acad Manage Rev 24(2):206Google Scholar
  57. Joo TW (2003) A trip through the maze of corporate democracy: shareholder voice and management composition. John’s Law Rev 77:735Google Scholar
  58. Karkkainen B (2004) New governance in legal thought and in the world: some splitting as antidote to overzealous Lumping. Minnesota Law Rev 89:471Google Scholar
  59. Karmel RS (1992) Implications of the stakeholder model. George Wash Law Rev 61:1156Google Scholar
  60. Keay A (2007) Tackling the issue of the corporate objective: an analysis of the United Kingdom’s enlightened shareholder value approach. Sydney Law Rev 29:577Google Scholar
  61. Klausner M (2005) The contractarian theory of corporate law: a generation later. J Corp Law 31:779Google Scholar
  62. Kobrin SJ (2001) Sovereignty@ bay: globalization, multinational enterprise, and the international political system. Oxford Handb Int Bus 181Google Scholar
  63. Kolk A (2008) Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Bus Strategy Environ 17(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kuhn T, Lee Ashcraft K (2003) Corporate scandal and the theory of the firm. Manag Commun Q 17(1):20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. The Committee on Corporate Law (1990) Other constituencies statutes: potential for confusion. Bus Lawyer 45:2253Google Scholar
  66. Lee IB (2005) Corporate law, profit maximization and the“ Responsible Shareholder”. Stan J Law Bus Finan 10(31):442Google Scholar
  67. Lee IB (2006) Efficiency and ethics in the debate about shareholder primacy. Delware J Corp Law 31:533Google Scholar
  68. Lee, Ming-Dong Poul (2008)A Review of the theories of Corporate Social Responsibility: Its Evolutionary Path and the Road Ahead (2008) 10(1) International Journal of Management Reviews 53Google Scholar
  69. Levitt T (1958) The dangers of social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 36(5):41Google Scholar
  70. Lipton M, Rosenblum SA (1991) A new system of corporate governance: the quinquennial election of directors. Univ Chic Law Rev 187Google Scholar
  71. Lobel O (2005) Interlocking regulatory and industrial relations: the governance of workplace safety. Admin Law Rev 57:1071Google Scholar
  72. Lobel O (2004) The renew deal: the fall of regulation and the rise of governance in contemporary legal thought. Minnesota Law Rev 89Google Scholar
  73. Lobel O, Amir O (2007) Behavioral versus institutional antecedents of decentralized enforcement in organizations: an experimental approach. RegulationGoogle Scholar
  74. López-Gamero MD, Claver-Cortés E, Molina-Azorín JF (2008) Complementary resources and capabilities for an ethical and environmental management: a qual/quan study. J Bus Ethics 82(3):701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wallman MHS (1998) Understanding the purpose of a corporation: an introduction. J Corp Law 24:807Google Scholar
  76. Mackenzie C (2007) Boards, incentives and corporate social responsibility: the case for a change of emphasis. Corp Gov Int Rev 15(5):935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Maragia B (2002) Almost there: another way of conceptualizing and explaining NGOs’ quest for legitimacy in global politics. Non-State Actors Int Law 2(3):301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Matten D, Crane A (2005) Corporate citizenship: toward an extended pheoretical conceptualization. Acad Manag Rev 166Google Scholar
  79. Mayer C (1997) Corporate governance, competition, and performance. J Law Soc 24(1):152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Millon D (1993) New directions in corporate law: communitarians, contractarians and the crisis in corporate law. Wash Lee Law Rev 50:1373Google Scholar
  81. Mitchell L (1991) Theoretical and practical framework for enforcing corporate constituency statutes. Texas Law Rev 70:579Google Scholar
  82. Neil M (1986) Corporate power, legitimacy, and social policy. Western Polit Q 197Google Scholar
  83. Nanz P, Steffek J (2004) Global governance, participation and the public sphere. Gov Oppos 39(2):314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Neu D, Warsame H, Pedwell K (1998) Managing public impressions: environmental disclosures in annual reports. Account Org Soc 23(3):265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad Manag Rev 145Google Scholar
  86. Paine LS (1994) Managing for organizational integrity. Harv Bus Rev 72:106Google Scholar
  87. Palazzo G, Georgscherer A (2006) Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: a communicative framework. J Bus Ethics 66(1):71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Peter F (2004) Choice, consent, and the legitimacy of market transactions. Econ Philos 20(01):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Pinto AR (2005) Globalization and the study of comparative corporate governance. Wiskinson Int Law J 23:477Google Scholar
  90. Preston LE, Sapienza HJ (1990) Stakeholder management and corporate performance. J Behav Econ 19(4):361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rahim MM (2011) Meta-regulation approach of law: a potential legal strategy to develop socially responsible business self-regulation in least developed common law countries. Common Law World Rev 40(2):174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Reich RB (1998) The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. Calif Manage Rev 40(2):8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Robert RW (1992) Determinants of corporate social responsibility discloser: an application of stakeholder theory. Account Org Soc 17(6)Google Scholar
  94. Roe M (2000) The shareholder wealth maximization norm and industrial organization. Univ Pennsylvania Law Rev 149:2063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Salamon LM (2000) The new governance and the tools of public action: an introduction. Fordham Urb LJ 28:1611Google Scholar
  96. Scherer GA, Palazzo G (2007) Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: business and society seen from a habermasian perspective. Acad Manag Rev 32(4):1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Shamir R (2008) The age of responsibilization: on market-embedded morality. Econ Soc 37(1):1Google Scholar
  98. Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1997a) A survey of corporate governance. J Finan 52(2):737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Smith DG (1997) The shareholder primacy norm. J Corp Law 23:277Google Scholar
  100. Solomon JM (2007) Law and governance in the 21st century regulatory state. Tex L Rev 86:819Google Scholar
  101. Steffek J (2003) The legitimation of international governance: a discourse approach. Eur J Int Res 9(2):249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manag Rev 571Google Scholar
  103. Sulkowski AJ, Greenfield K (2005) A bridle, a prod, and a big stick: an evaluation of class actions, shareholder proposals, and the ultra vires doctrine as methods for controlling corporate behavior. John’s Law Rev 79:929Google Scholar
  104. Sullivan D, Conlon D (1997) Crisis and transition in corporate governance paradigms: the role of the chancery court of delaware. Law Soc Rev 31(4):713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Swanson DL (1999) Toward an integrative theory of business and society: a research strategy for corporate social performance. Acad Manage Rev 24(3):506Google Scholar
  106. Trubek DM, Trubek L (2007) New governance and legal regulation: complementarity, rivalry and transformation. C J Eur Law 13:639Google Scholar
  107. Ullmann AA (1985) Data in search of a theory: a critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Aacad Manag Rev 540Google Scholar
  108. Van Oosterhout J (2005) Corporate citizenship: an idea whose time has not yet come. Acad Manage Rev 30(4):677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Walker N, Burca GDe (2006) Reconceiving law and new governance. Colubia J Eur Law 13 519Google Scholar
  110. Wallman S (1991) Proper interpretation of corporate constituency statutes and formulation of director duties, the. Stetson Law Rev 21:163Google Scholar
  111. Walsh JP, Weber K, Margolis JD (2003) Social issues and management: our lost cause found. J Manag 29(6):859Google Scholar
  112. Warren RC (2003) The evolution of business legitimacy. Eur Bus Rev 15(3):153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Warwick BA (2002) Reinventing the wheel: firestone and the role of ethics in the corporation. Ala Law Rev 54:1455Google Scholar
  114. Weber M (1968) Economy and societyGoogle Scholar
  115. Van Der Weide ME (1996) Against fiduciary duties to corporate stakeholders. Delware J Corp Law 21:27Google Scholar
  116. Wicks AC, Freeman RE (1998) Organization studies and the new pragmatism: positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Org Sci 123Google Scholar
  117. Winkler A (2004) Corporate law or the law of business?: stakeholders and corporate governance at the end of history. Law Contemp Probl 67(4):109Google Scholar
  118. Young I (2003) From guilt to solidarity. Dissent 50(2):39Google Scholar
  119. Zumbansen P (2006) The parallel worlds of corporate governance and labor law. Indiana J Glob Legal Stud 13(1):261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Anthoni JF (2001) Seafriends: summary of threats to the environment <www.seafriends.org.nz/issues/threats.htm> 10 Jan 2012
  121. Gonzalez G (2001) Code of conduct for Tncs reappears <http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/code-cn.htm> 7 Nov 2011
  122. Gregor F (2007) How can reporting become a relevant tool for corporate accountability at European level?. Disc Pap Eur Coal Corp Justice <http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporate-social-responsibility/reporting-disclosure/swedish-presidency/files/position_papers/how_can_reporting_ become_a_srelevant_tool_en.pdf> at 14 July 2011
  123. Bastmeijer K, Verschuuren JM (2005) NGO-business collaborations and the law: sustainability, limitations of the law, and the changing relationship between companies and Ngos, Corporate Social Responsibility. Account Gov Glob PerspGoogle Scholar
  124. Beauchamp TL, Bowie NE, Arnold DG (2001) Ethical theory and businessGoogle Scholar
  125. Beck U (2000) What is globalization?Google Scholar
  126. Belal AR (2008) Corporate social responsibility reporting in developing countries: the case of BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  127. Bichta C (2003) Corporate social responsibility: a role in government policy and regulation?Google Scholar
  128. Braithwaite J (1999) Crime, shame, and reintegrationGoogle Scholar
  129. Cannon T (1994) Corporate responsibility- a textbook on business ethics, governance, environment, role and responsibilitiesGoogle Scholar
  130. Carroll AB, Buchholtz AK (2008) Business and society: ethics and stakeholder managementGoogle Scholar
  131. Clarke T (2004) Theories of corporate governance: the philosophical foundations of corporate governanceGoogle Scholar
  132. Clarke T, Clegg SE (1998) Changing paradigms: the transformation of management knowledge for the 21st centuryGoogle Scholar
  133. Dean J (2001) Directing public companies: company law and the stakeholder societyGoogle Scholar
  134. Deegan C, Unerman J (2006) Financial accounting theoryGoogle Scholar
  135. Donaldson T, Dunfee TW (1999) Ties that bind: a social contracts approach to business ethicsGoogle Scholar
  136. Easterbrook F, Fischel D (1996) The economic structure of corporate lawGoogle Scholar
  137. Engelen E (2004) Corporate governance, Property and democracy: a conceptual critique of shareholder ideology, Theories of corporate governance: the philosophical foundations of corporate governanceGoogle Scholar
  138. Epstein EM, Votaw D (1978) Rationality, legitimacy, responsibility: search for new directions in business and societyGoogle Scholar
  139. Farrar J (2008) Corporate governance: theories, principles and practiceGoogle Scholar
  140. Freeman E (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approachGoogle Scholar
  141. Friedman M (1982) Capitalism and freedomGoogle Scholar
  142. Grace D, Cohen S (1998) Business ethics: Australian problems and casesGoogle Scholar
  143. Gray R, Owen D, Carol A (1996) Accounting and accountability: changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reportingGoogle Scholar
  144. Greenfield K (2006) The failure of corporate law: fundamental flaws and progressive possibilitiesGoogle Scholar
  145. Grolin J (1998) Corporate legitimacy in risk society - the case of Brent Spar, Business strategy and the environmentGoogle Scholar
  146. Habermas J (1998) Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracyGoogle Scholar
  147. Hoffman WM, Moore JM (1990) Business ethics: readings and cases in corporate moralityGoogle Scholar
  148. Honoré AM (1961) Ownership, Oxford essays in jurisprudenceGoogle Scholar
  149. Horrigan B (2005) Comparative corporate governance developments and key ongoing challenges from Anglo-American perspectives, research handbook on corporate legal responsiblityGoogle Scholar
  150. Keasey K, Thompson S, Wright M (1997) Corporate governance: economic and financial issuesGoogle Scholar
  151. Kelly G, Parkinson J (1998) The conceptual foundations of the company: a pluralist approach, the political economy of the companyGoogle Scholar
  152. Luo, Yadong (2007) Global dimensions of corporate governanceGoogle Scholar
  153. Mathews MR (1993) Socially responsible accountingGoogle Scholar
  154. Maurer JG (1971) Readings in organization theory: open-system approachesGoogle Scholar
  155. Mcbarnet D, Voiculescu A, Campbell T (2007) The new corporate accountability: corporate social responsibility and the lawGoogle Scholar
  156. Millon D (1995) Communitarianism in corporate law: foundations and law reform strategies, progressive corporate law: new perspectives on law. Culture SocGoogle Scholar
  157. Mitchell LE (2001) Corporate irresponsibility: America’s newest exportGoogle Scholar
  158. OECD (2004) OECD principles of corporate governanceGoogle Scholar
  159. Palan R (2006) The offshore world: sovereign markets, virtual places, and nomad millionairesGoogle Scholar
  160. Parker C (2002) Is there a reliable way to evaluate organisational compliance programs? Regulation: enforcement and complianceGoogle Scholar
  161. Plender J (1997) A stake in the future: the stakeholding solutionGoogle Scholar
  162. Porras JI, Collins J (1994) Built to last: successful habits of visionary companiesGoogle Scholar
  163. Rawls J (1999) A theory of justice (Revised edn)Google Scholar
  164. Richter J (2001) Holding corporations accountable: corporate conduct, international codes and citizen actionGoogle Scholar
  165. Sabel CF, Simon WH (2006) Epilogue: accountability without sovereignty, law and new governance in the EU and the USGoogle Scholar
  166. Selznick P (2002) The communitarian persuasionGoogle Scholar
  167. Sen A (2009) The idea of justiceGoogle Scholar
  168. Venkataraman S (2002) Stakeholder value equilibration and the entrepreneurial process, ethics and entrepreneurshipGoogle Scholar
  169. Vogel D (2005) The market for virtue: the potential and limits of corporate social responsibilityGoogle Scholar
  170. Lal D (2004) Private morality and capitalism: learning from the past. In: Dunning J (Ed), Making globalization good: the moral challenges of global capitalism 41Google Scholar
  171. Mitchell LE (2007) The board as a path toward corporate social responsibility. In: Mcbarnet D, Voiculescu A, Campbell T (Eds), The new corporate accountabilityGoogle Scholar
  172. Parker C (2007) Meta-regulation: legal accountability for corporate social responsibility?. In: Mcbarnet D, Voiculescu A, Campbell T (Eds), The new corporate accountability: corporate social responsibility and the lawGoogle Scholar
  173. Zingales L (1998) In the new palgrave dictionary of economics and the lawGoogle Scholar
  174. Johnston JS (2005) Signalling social responsibility: on the law and economics of market incentives for corporate environmental performance (University of Pennsylvania, institute for Law and Economic Research)Google Scholar
  175. Lindblom C (1994) The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance disclosureGoogle Scholar
  176. Clarkson MBE (1994) A risk based model of stakeholder theoryGoogle Scholar
  177. Parker C, Nielsen V (2006) Do corporate compliance programs influence compliance? (University of Melbourne)Google Scholar
  178. Scott C (2001) Analysing regulatory space: fragmented resources and institutional Design (0033-3565, Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar
  179. Statman M (2005) Socially responsible indexes: composition and performance (Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University)Google Scholar
  180. The good company, The Economist 22 January 2005 3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mia Mahmudur Rahim
    • 1
  1. 1.School of AccountancyQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations