Skip to main content

Crash-Testing in Robotics

  • Chapter
Towards Safe Robots

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics ((STAR,volume 90))

  • 2074 Accesses

Abstract

Ensuring safety leads to various aspects ranging from preventing electrical threats to coping with human mistakes. Up to now, this monograph focused on developing different methods for collision avoidance, detection, and reaction, i.e. to equip the robot with reactive motion control capabilities to appropriately react to environmental changes and unforeseen collisions. In this chapter however, the focus is on various aspects of physical human-robot contact and their related injury potential. In Figure 5.1 a first overview on relevant contact scenarios which potentially lead to human injury is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AAAM: The Abbreviated Injury Scale (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  2. AAAM: The Abbreviated Injury Scale (1990), Revision Update. Des Plaines/IL (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allsop, D., Perl T.R.and Warner, C.: Force/deflection and fracture characteristics of the temporo-parietal region of the human head. SAE Transactions, 2009–2018 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allsop, D., Warner, C., Wille, M., Schneider, D., Nahum, A.: Facial impact response - a comparison of the Hybrid III dummy and human cadaver. SAE Paper No.881719, Proc. 32th Stapp Car Crash Conf., pp. 781–797 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bicchi, A., Tonietti, G.: Fast and soft arm tactics: Dealing with the safety-performance trade-off in robot arms design and control. IEEE Robotics and Automation Mag. 11, 22–33 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brinkmann, B., Madea, B. (eds.): Handbuch gerichtliche Medizin. Springer (2004) (German)

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Luca, A., Albu-Schäffer, A., Haddadin, S., Hirzinger, G.: Collision detection and safe reaction with the DLR-III lightweight manipulator arm. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2006), Beijing, China, pp. 1623–1630 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Luca, A., Mattone, R.: Sensorless robot collision detection and hybrid force/motion control. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2005), Barcelona, Spain, pp. 1011–1016 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ebert, D., Henrich, D.: Safe human-robot-cooperation: Image-based collision detection for industrial robots. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2002), Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 239–244 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. EuroNCAP: European protocol new assessment programme - frontal impact testing protocol (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haddadin, S., Albu-Schäffer, A., Hirzinger, G.: Approaching Asimov’s 1st Law. HRI Caught on Film. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Washington DC, USA, pp. 177–184 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haddadin, S., Albu-Schäffer, A., Hirzinger, G.: Safety evaluation of physical human-robot interaction via crash-testing. In: Robotics: Science and Systems Conference (RSS 2007), Atlanta, USA, pp. 217–224 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haddadin, S., Albu-Schäffer, A., Hirzinger, G.: The role of the robot mass and velocity in physical human-robot interaction - part I: Unconstrained blunt impacts. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2008), Pasadena, USA, pp. 1331–1338 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Haddadin, S., Albu-Schäffer, A., Hirzinger, G.: The role of the robot mass and velocity in physical human-robot interaction - part II: Constrained blunt impacts. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2008), Pasadena, USA, pp. 1339–1345 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haddadin, S., Albu-Schäffer, A., Luca, A.D., Hirzinger, G.: Collision detection & reaction: A contribution to safe physical human-robot interaction. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2008), Nice, France, pp. 3356–3363 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haddadin, S., Laue, T., Frese, U., Hirzinger, G.: Foul 2050: Thoughts on physical interaction in human-robot soccer. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2007), San Diego, USA, pp. 3243–3250 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haddadin, S., Laue, T., Frese, U., Wolf, S., Albu-Schäffer, A., Hirzinger, G.: Kick it like a safe robot: Requirements for 2050. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 57, 761–775 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heinzmann, J., Zelinsky, A.: Quantitative safety guarantees for physical human-robot interaction. The Int. J. of Robotics Research 22(7-8), 479–504 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Herbst, B., Forrest, S., Chng, D., Sances, A.: Fidelity of Anthropometric Test Dummy Necks in Rollover Accidents. 16th ESV Conference Paper No. 98-S9-W-20 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Herman, I.: Physics of the Human Body. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ikuta, K., Ishii, H., Nokata, M.: Safety evaluation method of design and control for human-care robots. The Int. J. of Robotics Research 22(5), 281–298 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kallieris, D.: Schutzkriterien für den menschlichen Kopf. Forschungsprojekt FP 2.9317/2 (1998) (German)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kallieris, D.: Personal communication (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Khatib, O.: Inertial properties in robotic manipulation: an object-level framework. The Int. J. of Robotics Research 14(1), 19–36 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kroell, C., Scheider, D., Nahum, A.: Impact tolerance and response of the human thorax II. SAE Paper No.741187, Proc. 18th Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 383–457 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lim, H.O., Tanie, K.: Human safety mechanisms of human-friendly robots: Passive viscoelastic trunk and passively movable Base. The Int. J. of Robotics Research 19(4), 307–335 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lobdell, T., Kroell, C., Scheider, D., Hering, W.: Impact response of the human thorax. In: Symposium on Human Impact Response, pp. 201–245 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lumelsky, V., Cheung, E.: Real-time collision avoidance in teleoperated whole-sensitive robotarm manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 23, 194–203 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McElhaney, J., Stalnaker, R., Roberts, V.: Biomechanical aspects of head injury. Human Impact Response - Measurement and Simulation (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Melvin, J.: Human tolerance to impact conditions as related to motor vehicle design. SAE J885 APR80 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Melvin, J., Little, W., Smrcka, J., Yonghau, Z., Salloum, M.: A biomechanical face for the Hybrid III dummy. In: Proceedings of the 39th Car Crash Conference (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Morinaga, S., Kosuge, K.: Collision cetection system for manipulator based on adaptive impedance control law. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2002), Washington DC, USA, pp. 1080–1085 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Morita, T., Iwata, H., Sugano, S.: Development of human symbiotic robot: WENDY. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 1999), Detroit, USA, pp. 3183–3188 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  34. NHTSA: Actions to reduce the adverse effects of air bags. FMVSS No. 208 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nightingale, R., McElhaney, J., Camacho, D., Kleinberger, M., Winkelstein, B., Myers, B.: The dynamic responses of the cervical spine: Buckling, end conditions, and tolerance in compressive impacts. Proceedings of the 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference SAE Paper No.973344, pp. 771–796 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nyquist, G.W., Cavanaugh, J.M., Goldberg, S.J., King, A.I.: Facial impact tolerance and response. SAE Paper No.861896, Proc. 30th Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 733–754 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Okada, M., Ban, S., Nakamura, Y.: Skill of compliance with controlled charging/discharging of kinetic energy. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2002), Washington, USA, pp. 2455–2460 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Paluska, D., Herr, H.: The effect of series elasticity on actuator power and work output: Implications for robotic and prosthetic joint design. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 54, 667–673 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Prasad, P., Mertz, H.: The position of the US delegation to the ISO Working Group 6 on the use of HIC in automotive environment. SAE Paper 851246 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Prasad, P., Mertz, H.: Hybrid III sternal deflection associated with thoracic injury severities on occupants restrained with force-limiting shoulder belts. SAE Paper 910812 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Prasad, P., Mertz, H., Nusholtz, G.: Head injury risk assessment for forehead impacts. SAE Paper 960099 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rizzetti, A., Kallieris, D., Schiemann, P., Mattern, P.: Response and injury of the head-neck unit during a low velocity head impact. In: International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI 1997), pp. 194–207 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Schempf, H., Kraeuter, C., Blackwell, M.: ROBOLEG: A robotic soccer-ball kicking leg. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 1995), Nagoya, Aichi, Japan, vol. 2, pp. 1314–1318 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schneider, D., Nahum, A.: Impact studies of facial bones and skull. SAE Paper No.720965, Proc. 16th Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 186–204 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  45. United Auto Workers: Review of robot injuries - one of the best kept secrets. In: National Robot Safety Conference, Ypsilanti, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vanderborght, B., Verrelst, B., Ham, R.V., Damme, M.V., Lefeber, D., Duran, B., Beyl, P.: Exploiting natural dynamics to reduce energy consumption by controlling the compliance of soft actuators. The Int. J. of Robotics Research 25(4), 343–358 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Versace, J.: A review of the severity index. SAE Paper No.710881, Proc. 15th Stapp Car Crash Conf., pp. pp. 771–796 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Viano, D., Bir, C., Walilko, T., Sherman, D.: Ballistic impact to the forehead, zygoma, and mandible: Comparison of human and frangible dummy face biomechanics. The Journal of Trauma 56(6), 1305–1311 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wolf, S., Hirzinger, G.: A new variable stiffness design: Matching requirements of the next robot generation. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2008), Pasadena, USA, pp. 1741–1746 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zinn, M., Khatib, O., Roth, B.: A new actuation approach for human friendly robot design. The Int. J. of Robotics Research 23, 379–398 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sami Haddadin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haddadin, S. (2014). Crash-Testing in Robotics. In: Towards Safe Robots. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol 90. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40308-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40308-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40307-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40308-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics