Coordination Issues in Artifact-Centric Business Process Models

  • Giorgio Bruno
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8055)


In recent years, research in the field of business processes has shown a shift of interest from the activity-centric perspective to the artifact-centric one. The benefits, such as improved communication among the stakeholders and higher potential for flexibility, come from the focus on the key business entities (called artifacts) and on the distribution of the control flow in the life cycles of the artifacts. However, this perspective also entails a number of challenges, such as the coordination between the life cycles of the artifacts. This paper proposes an approach based on correlated transitions, i.e., transitions that belong to different life cycles and must be performed jointly. A new notation called Acta is illustrated with the help of two motivating examples.


business processes artifacts life cycles correlations tasks 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weske, M., Grünbauer, D.: Case handling: a new paradigm for business process support. Data & Knowledge Engineering 53, 129–162 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    BPMN, Business Process Model and Notation, V.2.0, (retrieved May 13, 2013)
  3. 3.
    Bruno, G.: Combining information and activities in business processes. In: Liddle, S.W., Schewe, K.-D., Tjoa, A.M., Zhou, X. (eds.) DEXA 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7447, pp. 481–488. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chao, T., et al.: Artifact-Based Transformation of IBM Global Financing. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 261–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davenport, T.H., Short, J.E.: The new industrial engineering: information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review, 11–27 (Summer 1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dumas, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Process-Aware Information Systems: bridging people and software through process technology. Wiley, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hull, R.: Artifact-centric business process models: Brief survey of research results and challenges. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2008, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5332, pp. 1152–1163. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hull, R., et al.: Introducing the Guard-Stage-Milestone approach for Specifying Business Entity Lifecycles. In: Bravetti, M., Bultan, T. (eds.) WS-FM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6551, pp. 1–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kucukoguz, E., Su, J.: On lifecycle constraints of artifact-centric workflows. In: Bravetti, M., Bultan, T. (eds.) WS-FM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6551, pp. 71–85. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Künzle, V., Reichert, M.: Towards object-aware process management systems: Issues, challenges, benefits. In: Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Ukor, R. (eds.) BPMDS 2009 and EMMSAD 2009. LNBIP, vol. 29, pp. 197–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Künzle, V., Reichert, M.: PHILharmonicFlows: towards a framework for object-aware process management. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice 23(4), 205–244 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Küster, J.M., Ryndina, K., Gall, H.C.: Consistency of business process models and object life cycles. In: Kühne, T. (ed.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4364, pp. 80–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mans, R.S., et al.: Proclets in healthcare. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 43(4), 632–649 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Müller, D., Reichert, M., Herbst, J.: Data-driven modeling and coordination of large process structures. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 131–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nigam, A., Caswell, N.S.: Business artifacts: an approach to operational specification. IBM Systems Journal 42(3), 428–445 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    OCL, Object Constraint Language, V.2.3.1, (retrieved May 13, 2013)
  17. 17.
    Sanz, J.L.C.: Entity-centric operations modeling for business process management - A multidisciplinary review of the state-of-the-art. In: 6th IEEE International Symposium on Service Oriented System Engineering, pp. 152–163. IEEE Press, New York (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giorgio Bruno
    • 1
  1. 1.Politecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations