Skip to main content

The Bridge Between Society and Behaviour in Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Methodological Cognitivism
  • 737 Accesses

Abstract

In social research and particularly in sociology of science explanations are frequently put forward that claim to correlate social factors with individual behaviours. These supposed explanations often fall into the various traps of causal fallacies because they do not bother to identify the real causal chain linking the social phenomenon to the individual action. They neglect to analyse the crucial component linking social factors to behavioural ones: namely the mental mechanisms of reasoning and decision-making.

This chapter is based on revised versions of Viale, R. (1993). Il ruolo dell’expertise scientifica nelle strategie di falsificazione e verifica - un esempio di cognitivismo metodologico nello studio della azione sociale (with R. Rumiati, P. Legrenzi, N. Bonini), Quaderni di Sociologia, 5; Viale, R. (1994). Dans la boîte noire: les mécanismes cognitifs de la décision scientifique, dans R. Boudon et M. Clavelin (édit.), Le rélativisme est-il résistible?, Parigi: Presses Universitaires de France. With kind permission from the Publishers; Viale, R. (1998). Cognizione e spiegazione nello studio sociale della scienza, Epistemologia, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia della Scienza, 2; and Viale, R. (2012). La spiegazione cognitiva nello studio sociale della scienza, in R. Rumiati (ed.). Pensiero, Azione Emozione. Bologna: Il Mulino.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Carlo Rubbia is an Italian physicist who was awarded the Nobel Prize in physics in 1984.

References

  • Anderson, J. A., & Rosenfeld, E. (Eds.). (1988). Neurocomputing: Foundations of research. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catellani, P. (1992). il giudice esperto. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. M. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective. The nature of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. S., & Sejnowski, T. (1992). The computational brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1978). Brainstorms. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books and Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H. (1977). Logic, meaning and conceptual role. The Journal of Philosophy, 74, 379–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. New York, NY: Cromwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York, NY: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press (It. Translation (1993). Modelli mentali, Bologna: Il Mulino).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1985). Logical thinking: Does it occur in daily life? Can it be taught? In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). The computer and the mind. London: William Collins (It. Translation (1990). La mente e il computer, Il Mulino, Bologna).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, P. D. (1990). Hypothesis formation as design. In P. Langley & J. Shrager (Eds.), Computational models of discovery and theory formation. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg, H. E., Jr. (1965). Comments. Philosophy of Science, 32, 147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zytkow, J. M. (1987). Scientific discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). Focussing in reasoning and decision making. Cognition, 49, 37–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Scientists and confirmation bias. In R. D. Tweney, M. E. Doherty, & C. R. Mynatt (Eds.), On scientific thinking. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay, M. (1979). Science and the sociology of knowledge. London: Allen & Unwin (It. Translation 1981. La scienza e la sociologia della conoscenza, Milano: Edizioni di Comunità).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall (It. Translation (1989). L’inferenza umana. Strategie e lacune del giudizio sociale. Bologna: Il Mulino).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pheby, J. (1991). Economia e filosofia della scienza. Il Mulino: Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajamoney, S. (1990). A computational approach to theory revision. In Shrager, J. & Langley, P. (Eds.) Computational models of discovery and theory formation. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1956). The direction of time. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, J. E., & Shoemaker, J. H. (2002). Winning decisions: Getting it right the first time. New York, NY: Currency/Doubleday Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. C. (1970). Statistical explanation. In R. G. Colodny (Ed.), The nature and function of scientific theories (pp. 172–231). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J., Weiss, D. J., Thomas, R., & Pounds, J. (2003). Performance-based measures of expertise. In S. L. Schneider & J. Shanteau (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Bevavioral and Brain Science, 12, 435–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Viale, R. (1994). Dans le boite noire: le mécanismes cognitifs de la décision scientifique. In R. Boudon & M. Clavelin (Eds.). Le relativisme est-il résistible?France: Presses Universitaires de.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viale, R. (1997b). From neoclassic to cognitive economics: The epistemological constraints of feasibility and realism. In R. Viale (Ed.), Cognitive economics (LASCOMES Series, 1). Torino: La Rosa Editrice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viale, R. (2012). Methodological cognitivism mind (Rationality, and society, Vol. 1). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Viale, R., Rumiati, R., Legrenzi, P., & Bonini, N. (1993). Il ruolo dell’expertise scientifica nelle strategie di falsificazione e verifica. Quaderni di Sociologia, XXXVII(5), 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Viale, R. (2013). The Bridge Between Society and Behaviour in Science. In: Methodological Cognitivism. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40216-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics