Abstract
In social research and particularly in sociology of science explanations are frequently put forward that claim to correlate social factors with individual behaviours. These supposed explanations often fall into the various traps of causal fallacies because they do not bother to identify the real causal chain linking the social phenomenon to the individual action. They neglect to analyse the crucial component linking social factors to behavioural ones: namely the mental mechanisms of reasoning and decision-making.
This chapter is based on revised versions of Viale, R. (1993). Il ruolo dell’expertise scientifica nelle strategie di falsificazione e verifica - un esempio di cognitivismo metodologico nello studio della azione sociale (with R. Rumiati, P. Legrenzi, N. Bonini), Quaderni di Sociologia, 5; Viale, R. (1994). Dans la boîte noire: les mécanismes cognitifs de la décision scientifique, dans R. Boudon et M. Clavelin (édit.), Le rélativisme est-il résistible?, Parigi: Presses Universitaires de France. With kind permission from the Publishers; Viale, R. (1998). Cognizione e spiegazione nello studio sociale della scienza, Epistemologia, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia della Scienza, 2; and Viale, R. (2012). La spiegazione cognitiva nello studio sociale della scienza, in R. Rumiati (ed.). Pensiero, Azione Emozione. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Carlo Rubbia is an Italian physicist who was awarded the Nobel Prize in physics in 1984.
References
Anderson, J. A., & Rosenfeld, E. (Eds.). (1988). Neurocomputing: Foundations of research. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Catellani, P. (1992). il giudice esperto. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Churchland, P. M. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Churchland, P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective. The nature of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Churchland, P. S., & Sejnowski, T. (1992). The computational brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Dennett, D. C. (1978). Brainstorms. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books and Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester.
Field, H. (1977). Logic, meaning and conceptual role. The Journal of Philosophy, 74, 379–408.
Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. New York, NY: Cromwell.
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York, NY: Free.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press (It. Translation (1993). Modelli mentali, Bologna: Il Mulino).
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1985). Logical thinking: Does it occur in daily life? Can it be taught? In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). The computer and the mind. London: William Collins (It. Translation (1990). La mente e il computer, Il Mulino, Bologna).
Karp, P. D. (1990). Hypothesis formation as design. In P. Langley & J. Shrager (Eds.), Computational models of discovery and theory formation. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
Kyburg, H. E., Jr. (1965). Comments. Philosophy of Science, 32, 147–151.
Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zytkow, J. M. (1987). Scientific discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). Focussing in reasoning and decision making. Cognition, 49, 37–66.
Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Scientists and confirmation bias. In R. D. Tweney, M. E. Doherty, & C. R. Mynatt (Eds.), On scientific thinking. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Mulkay, M. (1979). Science and the sociology of knowledge. London: Allen & Unwin (It. Translation 1981. La scienza e la sociologia della conoscenza, Milano: Edizioni di Comunità ).
Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall (It. Translation (1989). L’inferenza umana. Strategie e lacune del giudizio sociale. Bologna: Il Mulino).
Pheby, J. (1991). Economia e filosofia della scienza. Il Mulino: Bologna.
Rajamoney, S. (1990). A computational approach to theory revision. In Shrager, J. & Langley, P. (Eds.) Computational models of discovery and theory formation. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.
Reichenbach, H. (1956). The direction of time. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Russo, J. E., & Shoemaker, J. H. (2002). Winning decisions: Getting it right the first time. New York, NY: Currency/Doubleday Books.
Salmon, W. C. (1970). Statistical explanation. In R. G. Colodny (Ed.), The nature and function of scientific theories (pp. 172–231). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Shanteau, J., Weiss, D. J., Thomas, R., & Pounds, J. (2003). Performance-based measures of expertise. In S. L. Schneider & J. Shanteau (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Bevavioral and Brain Science, 12, 435–467.
van Fraassen, B. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Viale, R. (1994). Dans le boite noire: le mécanismes cognitifs de la décision scientifique. In R. Boudon & M. Clavelin (Eds.). Le relativisme est-il résistible?France: Presses Universitaires de.
Viale, R. (1997b). From neoclassic to cognitive economics: The epistemological constraints of feasibility and realism. In R. Viale (Ed.), Cognitive economics (LASCOMES Series, 1). Torino: La Rosa Editrice.
Viale, R. (2012). Methodological cognitivism mind (Rationality, and society, Vol. 1). Heidelberg: Springer.
Viale, R., Rumiati, R., Legrenzi, P., & Bonini, N. (1993). Il ruolo dell’expertise scientifica nelle strategie di falsificazione e verifica. Quaderni di Sociologia, XXXVII(5), 137–147.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Viale, R. (2013). The Bridge Between Society and Behaviour in Science. In: Methodological Cognitivism. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40216-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40216-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40215-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40216-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)