Skip to main content

Mutually Testing Processes

(Extended Abstract)

  • Conference paper
CONCUR 2013 – Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8052))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the standard testing theory of DeNicola-Hennessy one process is considered to be a refinement of another if every test guaranteed by the former is also guaranteed by the latter. In the domain of web services this has been recast, with processes viewed as servers and tests as clients. In this way the standard refinement preorder between servers is determined by their ability to satisfy clients.

But in this setting there is also a natural refinement preorder between clients, determined by their ability to be satisfied by servers. In more general settings where there is no distinction between clients and servers, but all processes are peers, there is a further refinement preorder based on the mutual satisfaction of peers.

We give a uniform account of these three preorders. In particular we give two characterisations. The first is behavioural, in terms of traces and ready sets. The second, for finite processes, is equational.

Research supported by SFI project SFI 06 IN.1 1898.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barbanera, F., de’Liguoro, U.: Two notions of sub-behaviour for session-based client/server systems. In: Kutsia, T., Schreiner, W., Fernández, M. (eds.) PPDP, pp. 155–164. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernardi, G.: Behavioural Equivalences for Web Services. PhD thesis, Trinity College Dublin (2013), https://www.scss.tcd.ie/~bernargi

  3. Bugliesi, M., Macedonio, D., Pino, L., Rossi, S.: Compliance preorders for web services. In: Laneve, C., Su, J. (eds.) WS-FM 2009. LNCS, vol. 6194, pp. 76–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bravetti, M., Zavattaro, G.: Contract-based discovery and composition of web services. In: Bernardo, M., Padovani, L., Zavattaro, G. (eds.) SFM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5569, pp. 261–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Carpineti, S., Castagna, G., Laneve, C., Padovani, L.: A formal account of contracts for web services. In: Bravetti, M., Núñez, M., Zavattaro, G. (eds.) WS-FM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4184, pp. 148–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Castagna, G., Gesbert, N., Padovani, L.: A theory of contracts for web services. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 31(5), 1–61 (2009); Supersedes the article in POPL 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Nicola, R., Hennessy, M.: CCS without tau’s. In: Ehrig, H., Kowalski, R.A., Levi, G., Montanari, U. (eds.) GI 1973. LNCS, vol. 249, pp. 138–152. Springer, Heidelberg (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hennessy, M.: Algebraic Theory of Processes. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoare, C.A.R.: Communicating sequential processes. Prentice-Hall (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Laneve, C., Padovani, L.: The must preorder revisited. In: Caires, L., Vasconcelos, V.T. (eds.) CONCUR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4703, pp. 212–225. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Milner, R.: Communication and Concurrency. Prentice-Hall (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mooij, A.J., Stahl, C., Voorhoeve, M.: Relating fair testing and accordance for service replaceability. J. Log. Algebr. Program. 79(3-5), 233–244 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. De Nicola, R., Hennessy, M.C.B.: Testing equivalences for processes. Theoretical Computer Science 34(1-2), 83–133 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Padovani, L.: Contract-based discovery of web services modulo simple orchestrators. Theor. Comput. Sci. 411(37), 3328–3347 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Padovani, L.: Fair Subtyping for Multi-Party Session Types. In: De Meuter, W., Roman, G.-C. (eds.) COORDINATION 2011. LNCS, vol. 6721, pp. 127–141. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Rensink, A., Vogler, W.: Fair testing. Information and Computation 205(2), 125–198 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bernardi, G., Hennessy, M. (2013). Mutually Testing Processes. In: D’Argenio, P.R., Melgratti, H. (eds) CONCUR 2013 – Concurrency Theory. CONCUR 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8052. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40184-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40184-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40183-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40184-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics