Skip to main content

Cost Preserving Bisimulations for Probabilistic Automata

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8052))

Abstract

Probabilistic automata constitute a versatile and elegant model for concurrent probabilistic systems. They are equipped with a compositional theory supporting abstraction, enabled by weak probabilistic bisimulation serving as the reference notion for summarising the effect of abstraction.

This paper considers probabilistic automata augmented with costs. It extends the notions of weak transitions in probabilistic automata in such a way that the costs incurred along a weak transition are captured. This gives rise to cost- preserving and cost-bounding variations of weak probabilistic bisimilarity. Polynomial-time decision algorithms are proposed, that can be effectively used to compute reward-bounding abstractions of Markov decision processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avni, G., Kupferman, O.: Making weighted containment feasible: A heuristic based on simulation and abstraction. In: Koutny, M., Ulidowski, I. (eds.) CONCUR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7454, pp. 84–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Baier, C., Engelen, B., Majster-Cederbaum, M.: Deciding bisimilarity and similarity for probabilistic processes. J. Computer and Systes Science 60(1), 187–231 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouyer, P., Fahrenberg, U., Larsen, K.G., Markey, N., Srba, J.: Infinite runs in weighted timed automata with energy constraints. In: Cassez, F., Jard, C. (eds.) FORMATS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5215, pp. 33–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Černý, P., Henzinger, T.A., Radhakrishna, A.: Simulation distances. TCS 413(1), 21–35 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chatterjee, K., Majumdar, R., Henzinger, T.A.: Markov decision processes with multiple objectives. In: Durand, B., Thomas, W. (eds.) STACS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3884, pp. 325–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Chehaibar, G., Garavel, H., Mounier, L., Tawbi, N., Zulian, F.: Specification and verification of the PowerScale TM bus arbitration protocol: An industrial experiment with LOTOS. In: FORTE. pp. 435–450 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eisentraut, C., Hermanns, H., Schuster, J., Turrini, A., Zhang, L.: The quest for minimal quotients for probabilistic automata. In: Piterman, N., Smolka, S.A. (eds.) TACAS 2013 (ETAPS 2013). LNCS, vol. 7795, pp. 16–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Etessami, K., Kwiatkowska, M., Vardi, M.Y., Yannakakis, M.: Molti-objective model checking of Markov decision processes. Logical Methods in Computer Science 4(8), 1–21 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Givan, R., Dean, T., Greig, M.: Equivalence notions and model minimization in Markov decision processes. Artificial Intelligence 147(1-2), 163–223 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hermanns, H., Katoen, J.P.: Automated compositional Markov chain generation for a plain-old telephone system. Science of Computer Programming 36(1), 97–127 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hermanns, H., Turrini, A.: Deciding probabilistic automata weak bisimulation in polynomial time. In: FSTTCS, pp. 435–447 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hinton, A., Kwiatkowska, M., Norman, G., Parker, D.: PRISM: A tool for automatic verification of probabilistic systems. In: Hermanns, H., Palsberg, J. (eds.) TACAS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3920, pp. 441–444. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Howard, R.A.: Dynamic Probabilistic Systems, Volume II: Semi-Markov and Decision Processes. Dover Publications (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jonsson, B., Larsen, K.G.: Specification and refinement of probabilistic processes. In: LICS, pp. 266–277 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Katoen, J.-P., Kemna, T., Zapreev, I., Jansen, D.N.: Bisimulation minimisation mostly speeds up probabilistic model checking. In: Grumberg, O., Huth, M. (eds.) TACAS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4424, pp. 87–101. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Lynch, N.A., Segala, R., Vaandrager, F.W.: Observing branching structure through probabilistic contexts. SIAM J. on Computing 37(4), 977–1013 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Quaas, K.: Weighted timed MSO logics. In: Diekert, V., Nowotka, D. (eds.) DLT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5583, pp. 419–430. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Segala, R.: Modeling and Verification of Randomized Distributed Real-Time Systems. Ph.D. thesis. MIT (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Segala, R.: Probability and nondeterminism in operational models of concurrency. In: Baier, C., Hermanns, H. (eds.) CONCUR 2006. LNCS, vol. 4137, pp. 64–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hermanns, H., Turrini, A. (2013). Cost Preserving Bisimulations for Probabilistic Automata. In: D’Argenio, P.R., Melgratti, H. (eds) CONCUR 2013 – Concurrency Theory. CONCUR 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8052. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40184-8_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40184-8_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40183-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40184-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics