Advertisement

Towards Mobile Government: Verification of Electronic Signatures on Smartphones

  • Thomas Zefferer
  • Fabian Golser
  • Thomas Lenz
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8061)

Abstract

Electronic signatures are a crucial concept for transactional e-government services. Beside the secure creation of electronic signatures, the reliable verification of electronically signed documents is of special importance. Various tools, which allow verification of electronic signatures, have been introduced during the past years. However, most of these tools have been tailored to the requirements of classical end-user devices such as desktop computers or laptops and cannot be conveniently used on smartphones. This is problematic, since smartphones and related mobile end-user devices are gradually replacing classical end-user devices. To overcome this issue, we present a signature-verification solution for smartphones in this paper. The presented solution is based on a platform-agnostic architectural design, which can be applied on arbitrary smartphone platforms such as Google Android or Apple iOS. The practical applicability of the proposed solution has been evaluated by means of a concrete implementation. This implementation shows that the presented solution provides convenient means to verify electronically signed documents on smartphones and hence paves the way for the realization of transactional e-government services on mobile end-user devices.

Keywords

Electronic signatures Mobile Government Smartphones Signature verification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jonsson, J., Kaliski, B.: Public-Key Cryptography Standards (PKCS) #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.1, RFC 3447, RFC Editor, United States (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST): FIPS-186-2: Digital Signature Standard (DSS) (January 2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union: Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures (2000), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2000:013:0012:0020:EN:PDF
  4. 4.
    Zefferer, T., Tauber, A., Zwattendorfer, B., Stranacher, K.: Qualified PDF signatures on mobile phones. In: Electronic Government and Electronic Participation - Joint Proceedings of Ongoing Research and Projects of IFIP EGOV and IFIP ePart (2012) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leitold, H., Hollosi, A., Posch, R.: Security Architecture of the Austrian Citizen Card Concept. In: Proceedings of 18th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, ACSAC 2002, Las Vegas, December 9-13, pp. 391–400. IEEE Computer Society (2002) ISBN 0-7695-1828-1, ISSN 1063-9527Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leitold, H., Posch, R., Rössler, T.: Media-break resistant eSignatures in eGovernment: An Austrian experience. In: Gritzalis, D., Lopez, J. (eds.) SEC 2009. IFIP AICT, vol. 297, pp. 109–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    RSA Laboratories: PKCS#7: Cryptographic Message Syntax Standard, RSA Laboratories (1993) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Housley, R.: Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS), RFC 5652 RFC Editor, United States (2009), http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5652.txt
  9. 9.
    Ramsdell, B., Turner, S.: Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.2 Message Specification, RFC 5751, RFC Editor, United States (2010) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    World Wide Web Consortium: XML Signature Syntax and Processing (Second Edition), W3C (2008b), http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/
  11. 11.
    Lenz, T., Stranacher, K., Zefferer, T.: Towards a Modular Architecture for Adaptable Signature-Verification Tools. In: 9th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (2013) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gudgin, M., Hadley, M., Mendelsohn, N., Moreau, J.-J., Nielsen, H.F.: Soap version 1.2 part 1: Messaging framework, W3C (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P., Berners-Lee, T.: Hypertext transfer protocol – http/1.1, RFC 2616, RFC Editor, United States (1999), http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt
  14. 14.
    Posch, K.C., Posch, R., Tauber, A., Zefferer, T., Zwattendorfer, B.: Secure and Privacy-preserving eGovernment – Best Practice Austria. In: Calude, C.S., Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Rainbow of Computer Science. LNCS, vol. 6570, pp. 259–269. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jones, C.: Android Solidifies Smartphone Market Share. Forbes (2013), http://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2013/02/13/android-solidifies-smartphone-market-share/
  16. 16.
    Zefferer, T., Teufl, P.: Opportunities and Forthcoming Challenges of Smartphone-Based m-Government Services. European Journal of e-Practice, Megatrends in E-Government (2011), http://www.epractice.eu/files/European%20Journal%20epractice%20Volume%2013%20-%2004%20-%20Megatrends%20in%20eGovernment.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Zefferer
    • 1
  • Fabian Golser
    • 1
  • Thomas Lenz
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Applied Information Processing and CommunicationsGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations