Advertisement

Abstract

This paper analyses the legal basis and technical possibilities for citizen participation by electronic means on the European Union level; in particular, the various forms of dialogue introduced by Art 11 TEU as well as Art 20 TFEU are analysed. [1a, 1b]

Keywords

eParticipation European Union citizens’ initiative petition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Treaty on the European Union (TEU) (June 12, 2013), http://www.lisbon-treaty.org
  2. 2.
    Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) (June 12, 2013), http://www.lisbon-treaty.org
  3. 3.
    European Parliament, Information on online petitions available at (June 12, 2013), http://www.europarl.europa.eu/aboutparliament/de/00533cec74/Petitions.html
  4. 4.
    Deutscher Bundestag, Information über Onlinepetitionen available at (June 12, 2013), https://epetitionen.bundestag.de/epet/peteinreichen.html
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Müller-Török, R.: Identification in Paper-based and Electronic Democracy Processes – A Comparison. In: Prosser, A. (ed.) Proceedings of EDEM 2011, pp. 121–128. OCG-Verlag, Vienna (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sigmund, A.-M.: Article 11 TEU in the perspective oft he EESC. In: Pichler, J.W., Balthasar, A. (eds.) Open Dialogue between EU Institutions and Citizens – Chances and Challenges, pp. 196–201. Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Vienna (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tobler, C., Beglinger, J.: Essential EU Law in Charts, 2nd edn., Lisbon. HVG-ORAC, Leiden (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pichler, J., Balthasar, A.: Introduction. In: Pichler, J., Balthasar, A. (eds.) Open Dialogue between EU Institutions and Citizens – Chances and Challenges, pp. 17–26. Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Vienna (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Balthasar, A., Müller-Török, R.: Ein Vorschlag zur Effektuierung der Richtlinie 93/109/EG. In: Schweighofer, E., Kummer, F. (eds.) Europäische Projektkultur als Beitrag zur Rationalisierung des Rechts, Tagungsband der IRIS 2011, pp. 303–310. OCG Verlag, Vienna (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prosser, A.: Richtlinie 93/109/EG und In-Memory Computing. In: Schweighofer, E., Kummer, F., Hötzendorfer, W. (eds.) Abstraktion und Applikation, Tagungsband IRIS 2013, pp. 257–262. OCG Verlag, Vienna (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Velikanov, C.: Responsibility of participants in e-deliberation. In: Leitner, C., Haase, M., Makolm, J., Traunmüller, R. (eds.) Eastern European e|Gov Days 2010, pp. 155–162. OCG Verlag, Vienna (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leitner, C., Müller-Török, R.: Evaluating E-Participation Projects in Austria – A Meth-odological Approach for a Decision on the Success of E-Participation. In: Prosser, A. (ed.) Proceedings of EDEM 2011, pp. 53–66. OCG-Verlag, Vienna (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harden, I.: Open dialogue between institutions and citizens – the Ombudsman’s perspective – Opening Session – Workshop I. In: Pichler, J., Balthasar, A. (eds.) Open Dialogue between EU Institutions and Citizens – Chances and Challenges, pp. 124–128. Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Vienna (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Personal Web research by the author (June 18, 2013) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Häfner, G.: ECI – problems with online collection tool – concession of the Commission (June 19, 2013), http://www.democracy-international.org/eci-software.html
  17. 17.
    Müller-Török, R., Stein, R.: Die Rechtsakte zur Europäischen Bürgerinitiative – Offene Fragen und Risiken für Organisatoren. In: Schweighofer, E., Kummer, F., Hötzendorfer, W. (eds.) Transformation Juristischer Sprachen, Tagungsband der IRIS 2012, pp. 237–244. OCG Verlag, Vienna (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Derflinger, W.: The democratic and integritive mission of the “European Citizens’ Initiative” in the contect of “Civil Dialogue” and “Civil Society”. In: Pichler, J., Balthasar, A. (eds.) Open Dialogue between EU Institutions and Citizens – Chances and Challenges, pp. 74–86. Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Vienna (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Müller-Török, R., Stein, R.: Die Europäische Bürgerinitiative aus Sicht nationaler Wahlbehörden. Verwaltung und Management 5, 255–262 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Balthasar, A., Prosser, A.: Die Europäische Bürgerinitiative – Gefährdung der Glaubwürdigkeit eines direktdemokratischen Instruments? Journal für Rechtspolitik 3, 122–132 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sigmund, A.-M.: Towards a supportive infrastructure. In: Pichler, J., Kaufmann, B. (eds.) The Next Big Thing – Making Europe Ready for the Citizens’ Initiative. Neuer Wissen-schaftlicher Verlag, Vienna (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Prosser
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Economics and BusinessViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations