Abstract
In this paper, we propose a new validation approach for network selection access. The proposed approach is able to deal with the inconsistent ranking outcomes problem of the multi attribute decision making (MADM) methods by using the group MADM. Thus, we aim to select the appropriate weighting algorithm which can be combined with the ranking algorithm based on Mahalanobis distance. Simulation results are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of our new validation approach for background traffic and streaming traffic.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gustafsson, E., Jonsson, A.: Always best connected. IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine 10(1), 49–55 (2003)
Gazis, V., Houssos, N., Alonistioti, N., Merakos, L.: On the complexity of Always Best Connected in 4G mobile networks. In: 58th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC, vol. 4, pp. 2312–2316 (2003)
Sheng-mei, L., Su, P., Zheng-kun, M., Qing-min, M., Ming-hai, X.: A simple additive weighting vertical handoff algorithm based on SINR and AHP for heterogeneous wireless networks. In: International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, ICICTA, pp. 347–350 (2010)
Lahby, M., Leghris, C., Adib, A.: A Hybrid Approach for Network Selection in Heterogeneous Multi-Access Environments. In: The Proceedings of the 4th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS), Paris, France, pp. 1–5 (2011)
Lahby, M., Leghris, C., Adib, A.: A Novel Ranking Algorithm Based Network Selection For Heterogeneous Wireless Access. Journal of Networks 8(2), 263–272 (2013)
Yeh, C.-H., Chang, Y.-H.: Validating multiattribute decision making methods for supporting group decisions. In: IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems, pp. 878–883 (2008)
Saaty, T.L.: Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. RWS Publications (1998)
Mahmoodzadeh, S., et al.: Project Selection by Using Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Technique. In: Proceeding of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 24 (October 2007)
Lee, J., Kim, S.: Using Analytic Network Process and Goal Programming for Interdependent Information System Project Selection. Computers and Operation Research 27(4), 367–382 (2000)
Mikhailov, L., Singh, M.G.: Fuzzy analytic network process and its application to the development of decision support systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 33–41 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lahby, M., Cherkaoui, L., Adib, A. (2013). New Validation Approach Based on Group MADM for Network Selection. In: Gramoli, V., Guerraoui, R. (eds) Networked Systems. NETYS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7853. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40148-0_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40148-0_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40147-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40148-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)