Skip to main content

The (Re)birth of Inorganic Chemistry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Up from Generality

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science ((BRIESFHISTCHEM))

  • 618 Accesses

Abstract

In 1956 Ronald Nyholm proclaimed the renaissance of inorganic chemistry in his inaugural address as Professor of Inorganic Chemistry at University College London, where he had recently arrived (from Australia).

Inorganic chemistry is not general chemistry.… Inorganic chemistry is not general chemistry.

Therald Moeller, Inorganic Chemistry: An Advanced Textbook (1952)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    F. Albert Cotton (1930-2007) was a graduate student with Geoffrey Wilkinson (see Chap. 4) at Harvard, joining the faculty at MIT in 1955, and moving thence to Texas A&M in 1972. He was one of the most prominent figures in the field of inorganic chemistry throughout the second half of the twentieth century, known for his work in structural chemistry, especially that of species with multiple metal–metal bonds; for the many students and postdocs he trained and sent on to academic positions (see Fig. 5.10); and for the important textbook Advanced Inorganic Chemistry that he co-authored with Wilkinson.

  2. 2.

    See the section at the end of the book “Notes on quantitative methodology” for explanations of how and from where these data were assembled.

  3. 3.

    The first edition was called “Facilities, Publications and Doctoral Theses in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering at US Universities, 1953;” the title DGR was used subsequently.

  4. 4.

    Probably there were a few more that didn’t get around to submitting data—indeed there was certainly at least one such, as there is no listing for Harvard in the 1953 edition!

  5. 5.

    Chemists working outside the US are eligible for some of the ACS awards, but not the one in Pure Chemistry.

  6. 6.

    The Priestley Medal, the top award of the ACS, is also given without respect to field; however, a large fraction of earlier awards (up to 1960 or so) went to industrial chemists and chemical engineers, blurring any easily detectable change over the crucial time period.

  7. 7.

    A more thorough exploration of these observations could constitute a very interesting sociological study in its own right, but that would go well beyond the scope of this book.

  8. 8.

    For additional comments on this problematic aspect see Notes on quantitative methodology.

  9. 9.

    That isn’t entirely true: before 1957 there was no separate Division of Inorganic Chemistry, but rather a joint Division of Physical and Inorganic Chemistry, and papers presented therein need to be apportioned between them appropriately. See Notes on quantitative methodology.

  10. 10.

    Halpern, among others, has offered that suggestion; his own experience (just an isolated example, to be sure) doesn’t necessarily support it, since as an undergraduate and graduate student at McGill University in the late 1940s he was exposed to no inorganic chemistry at all [12].

  11. 11.

    Joseph Chatt (1914-1994) spent the earlier part of his career in industry, at Imperial Chemical Industries; while his work there in organo-transition metal chemistry was widely recognized, his impact on the field really burgeoned after he became Chair of inorganic chemistry at the University of Sussex in the early 1960s.

  12. 12.

    Brock doesn’t mention John Anderson, who was not Australian by birth but spent the majority of his earlier career at the University of Melbourne before taking up the inorganic chair at Oxford.

References

  1. Nyholm RS (1957) The renaissance of inorganic chemistry. J Chem Educ 34: 166–169

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bailar JC (1987) John C. Bailar, Jr., interview by Theodore L. Brown at University of Illinois, Urbana, Urbana, Illinois, 28 May & 17 June 1987 (Philadelphia: Chemical Heritage Foundation, Oral History Transcript # 0073)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Basolo F (2002) From Coello to inorganic chemistry: a lifetime of reactions. Kluwer, New York, p xii

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown TL (2012) Personal communication

    Google Scholar 

  5. Collman JP (2012) Personal communication

    Google Scholar 

  6. Basolo F (2002) Fred Basolo interview by Arnold Thackray and Arthur Daemmrich at Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 27 September 2002 (Philadelphia: Chemical Heritage Foundation, Oral History Transcript # 0264)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gray HB (2011) Voices of inorganic chemistry (interview with Richard Eisenberg) on website http://pubs.acs.org/page/inocaj/multimedia/voices.html

  8. Gray HB (2012) Personal communication

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eisenberg R (2012) Personal communication

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holm RH (2012) Personal communication

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holm RH (2011) Voices of inorganic chemistry (interview with Richard Eisenberg) on website http://pubs.acs.org/page/inocaj/multimedia/voices.html

  12. Halpern J (2012) Personal communication

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hawthorne MF (2011) Voices of inorganic chemistry (interview with Richard Eisenberg) on website http://pubs.acs.org/page/inocaj/multimedia/voices.html

  14. Raymond KN (2011) Voices of inorganic chemistry (interview with Richard Eisenberg) on website http://pubs.acs.org/page/inocaj/multimedia/voices.html

  15. Lippard SJ (2011) Voices of inorganic chemistry (interview with Richard Eisenberg) on website http://pubs.acs.org/page/inocaj/multimedia/voices.html

  16. Thackray T, Sturchio JL, Carroll PT, Bud R (1985) Chemistry in America 1876-1976: historical indicators. Reidel, Dordrecht, p 186–187

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lagerkvist U (2012) The Periodic Table and a missed Nobel Prize. World Scientific, Singapore, p 100–114

    Google Scholar 

  18. From the ACS website, http://webapps.acs.org/findawards/detail.jsp?ContentId=CTP_004546. Accessed 17 January 2013

  19. Larsen EM (1957) The crisis in inorganic chemistry. J Chem Ed 34:427–429

    Google Scholar 

  20. Churchill MR (2012) Personal communication

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lord Lewis of Newnham, Johnson BFG (1997) Cyril Clifford Addison: 28 November 1913-1 April 1994. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 43:2–12

    Google Scholar 

  22. http://www.chem.ox.ac.uk/history/. Accessed 28 January 2013

  23. Stone FGA (1993) Leaving no stone unturned: pathways in organometallic chemistry. ACS, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brock WH (1992) The Norton history of chemistry. Norton, New York, p 603–618

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stokes HN (1899) The revival of inorganic chemistry. Science 9: 601–615

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wieghardt K (2011) Voices of inorganic chemistry (interview with Richard Eisenberg) on website http://pubs.acs.org/page/inocaj/multimedia/voices.html

  27. Moeller T (1952) Inorganic chemistry: an advanced textbook. Wiley, New York, p 3

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay A. Labinger .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Labinger, J.A. (2013). The (Re)birth of Inorganic Chemistry. In: Up from Generality. SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40120-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics