Skip to main content

False Labor: Inorganic Chemistry in the Late Nineteenth-Early Twentieth Centuries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Up from Generality

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science ((BRIESFHISTCHEM))

  • 606 Accesses

Abstract

The previous chapter paints a rather bleak portrait of inorganic chemistry in the late 1800s. However, both chemists and historians have pointed to a significant upgrade in status—using terms such as revival, rebirth, renaissance—taking place even before the turn of the century.

Those of us who were familiar with the state of inorganic chemistry in universities twenty to thirty years ago will recall that at that time it was widely regarded as a dull and uninteresting part of the undergraduate course….that the opportunities for research in inorganic chemistry were few, and that in any case the problems were dull and uninspiring; as a result, relatively few people specialized in this subject.

Ronald Nyholm, The Renaissance of Inorganic Chemistry (1956)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Henry Newlin Stokes (1859–1942) was a chemist with the US Geological Survey and Bureau of Standards, and served a term as President of the ACS around the turn of the century, before turning to philosophy, becoming a leader of the Theosophical Society.

  2. 2.

    Sophus Mads Jørgensen (1837–1914), a Danish chemist who made many of the early important experimental discoveries in coordination chemistry, but fought a long rear-guard action against Werner’s conceptual interpretation, until finally acknowledging the latter’s triumph in the early twentieth century.

  3. 3.

    “Die Mitteilungen über anorganisch-chemische Untersuchungen sind bis jetzt in einer sehr grossen Ansahl von in- und ausländischen Zeitschriften verstreut zur Veröffentlichung gelangt; sie erscheinen als Fremdlinge unter der immer mehr wachsenden Anzahl von Arbeiten aus dem Gebiete der Chemie der Kohlenstoffverbindinungen. Diese Stellung entspricht nicht der heutigen Bedeutung der anorganische Chemie, denn diese ist im Laufe der letzten Decennien aus dem engen Rahmen einer rein beschreibenden Naturwissenschaft herausgetreten und nimmt Teil an der Entscheidung von Fragen, welche für die allgemeine Chemie von hoher Bedeutung sind.”

References

  1. von Meyer E (1906) A history of chemistry from earliest times to the present day (3rd English edition, translated by G. McGowan). Macmillan & Co., London, p 417

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stokes HN (1899) The revival of inorganic chemistry. Science 9: 601–615

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stokes HN (1900) The revival of organic chemistry. Science 12: 537–556

    Google Scholar 

  4. Basolo F (2002) Fred Basolo interview by Arnold Thackray and Arthur Daemmrich at Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 27 September 2002 (Philadelphia: Chemical Heritage Foundation, Oral History Transcript # 0264)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cobb C, Goldwhite H (1995) Creations of fire: chemistry’s lively history from alchemy to the atomic age. Plenum Press, New York, p 257

    Google Scholar 

  6. Partington JR (1957/1989) A short history of chemistry (3rd ed). Dover, New York, chapter XV

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brock WH (1992) The Norton history of chemistry. W. W. Norton & Co., New York, p 314

    Google Scholar 

  8. Russell CA (1976) The structure of chemistry, Unit 3. Open University Press, Milton Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bensaude-Vincent B, Stengers I (1996) A history of chemistry (translated by D. van Dam). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, p 209–210

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barkan DK (1992) A usable past: creating disciplinary space for physical chemistry. In: Nye MJ, Richards JL, Stuewer RH (eds) The invention of physical science: intersections of mathematics, theology and natural philosophy since the seventeenth century. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kauffman GB (1966) Alfred Werner, founder of coordination chemistry. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brock WH (1992) The Norton history of chemistry. Norton, New York, p 573–591

    Google Scholar 

  13. Werner A (1893) Beitrag zur Konstitution anorganischer Verbindungen. Z anorg chem 3:267–330

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brock WH, Jensen KA, Jørgensen CK, Kauffman GB (1982) Searching the Literature To Learn How the Term “Ligand” Became a Part of the Chemical Language. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 22:125–129

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hudson J (1992) The history of chemistry. Chapman & Hall, New York, p 187

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kauffman GB (1966) Alfred Werner, founder of coordination chemistry. Springer, Berlin, p 64

    Google Scholar 

  17. Voss L, Krüss G (1892) Zur Einführung. Z. anorg. chem. 1:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jansen M (2012) Personal communication

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kauffman GB (1973) Alfred Werner’s research on structural isomerism. Coord Chem Rev 11:161–188 (see footnote, p 174)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wiberg E (1977) Alfred Stock and the renaissance of inorganic chemistry (translated by H. Nöth and R. H. Walter). Pure Appl Chem 49:691–700

    Google Scholar 

  21. Werner H (2009) Landmarks in organo-transition metal chemistry: a personal view. Springer, New York, p 85–127

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brock WH (1992) The Norton history of chemistry. Norton, New York, p 462–505

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hargittai I (2003) Candid science III: more conversations with famous chemists. Imperial College Press, London, p 478

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hargittai B, Hargittai I (2005) Candid science V: conversations with famous scientists. Imperial College Press, London, p 353

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay A. Labinger .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Labinger, J.A. (2013). False Labor: Inorganic Chemistry in the Late Nineteenth-Early Twentieth Centuries. In: Up from Generality. SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40120-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics