Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 242))

  • 3062 Accesses

Abstract

The research was aimed at conceptualizing and empirically testing a path to highlight the interrelationships of conflict types and innovative work behavior. A random sample of 320 managers of telecommunication sector of Pakistan was selected for the study. The conceptual model was empirically tested using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The findings reveal positive and significant impact of task conflict on innovative work behavior. Further, it shows the significant positive impact of innovative work behavior on process conflict. There is also a significant and positive impact of process conflict on relationship conflict. This study presents a role model for the strategic managers and practitioners as a guideline to stimulate innovative work behavior through better conflict management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brahnam SD, Margavio TM, Hignite MA et al (2005) A bender-based categorization for conflict resolution. Journal of Management Development 24(3):197–208

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vokic NP, Sontor S (2005) Conflict management styles in croatian enterprises-the relationship between individual characteristics and conflict handling styles. Working Paper Series

    Google Scholar 

  3. Darling JR, Walker WE (2001) Effective conflict management: use of the behavioral style model. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 22(5):230–242

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rahim MA (1983) A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal 26(2):368–376

    Google Scholar 

  5. West MA (2000) Reflexivity, revolution, and innovation in work teams. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams 5:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klijn M, Tomic W (2010) A review of creativity within organizations from a psychological perspective. Journal of Management Development 29(4):322–343

    Google Scholar 

  7. Janssen O (2000) Job demand, perception of effort reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 73(3):287–302

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cetin MO, Hacifazlioglu O (2004) Conflict management styles: a comparative study of university academics and high school teachers. Journal of American Academy of Business 5(1/2):325–332

    Google Scholar 

  9. Banner DK (1995) Conflict resolution: a recontextualization. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 16(1):31–34

    Google Scholar 

  10. Voki’c NP, Sontor S (2005) Conflict management styles in croatian enterprises-the relationship between individual characteristics and conflict handling styles. Working Paper Series

    Google Scholar 

  11. Anwar N, Maitlo Q, Soomro MB et al (2012) Task conflicts and its relationship with employee’s performance. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business 3(9):1338–1343

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jehn KA, Greer L, Levine S et al (2008) The effects of conflict types, dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation 17(6):465–495

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jehn KA (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly 40(2):256–282

    Google Scholar 

  14. Parker SK, Williams HM, Turner N (2006) Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology 91(3):636–652

    Google Scholar 

  15. Crant J (2000) Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management 26(3):435–462

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Jong JPJ (2006) Individual innovation: the connection between leadership and employees’ innovative work behavior. Paper provided by EIM business and policy research in its series scales research reports with number R200604. Available at: http://www.entrepreneurship-sme.eu/pdf-ez/R200604.pdf

  17. Drucker PF (1985) Innovation and entrepreneurship: practice and principles. Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kanter R (1988) When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior 10:169–211

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lu L, Zhou F, Leung K (2011) Effects of task and relationship conflicts on individual work behaviors. International Journal of Conflict Management 22(2):131–150

    Google Scholar 

  20. Van de Ven AA, Poole MS (1988) Paradoxical requirements for a theory of organizational change. In Quinn RE, Cameron KS (eds), Paradoxes and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management, pp 19–63

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scott GS, Bruce AR (1994) Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of innovation in the workplace. The Academy of Management Journal 37:580–607

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jones ML (1993) Role conflict: cause of burnout or energizer? Social work 38(2):136–141

    Google Scholar 

  23. Seiber SD (1974) Toward a theory of role accumulation. American Sociological Review 39(4):567–578

    Google Scholar 

  24. Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in context: update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  25. West MA, Anderson NR (1996) Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology 81(6):680–693

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jehn KA, Northcraft G, Neale M (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly 44(4):741–763

    Google Scholar 

  27. Amason AC (1996) Distinguishing the effect of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal 39(1):123–148

    Google Scholar 

  28. Turner M, Pratkanis A (1997) Mitigating groupthink by stimulating constructive conflict. In: De Dreu CKW, Van de Vliert E (eds.), Using conflict in organizations 39–52

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jehn KA (1997) A aualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(3):530–557

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shah PP, Jehn KA (1993) Do friends perform better that acquaintances: The interaction of friendship, conflict and task. Group Decision and Negotiation 2(2):149–166

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zaman S (2006) Determinants of Innovative work behavior: Organizational and individual characteristics. Unpublished M.Phil Dissertation, National Institute of Psychology, Quaid-i- Azam University, Islamabad

    Google Scholar 

  32. Arbuckle JL (2005) Amos 6.0 User’s Guide, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  33. Joreskog KG, Sorbom D (1993) LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  34. Manoux A, Clarke P, Marmot M (2002) Multiple measures of socioeconomic position and psychosocial health: Proximal and distal measures. International Journal of Epidemiology 31(6):1192–1199

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG (2004) A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, 2nd edn, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sacker A, Bartley M, Firth D et al (2001) Dimensions of social inequality in the health of women in England: Occupational, material and behavioral pathways. Social Science and Medicine 52(5):763–781

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rabia Imran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Imran, R., Zaheer, A., Fatima, A., Khan, M.A. (2014). Conflict Types and Innovative Work Behavior: Exploring a New Path. In: Xu, J., Fry, J., Lev, B., Hajiyev, A. (eds) Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 242. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40081-0_84

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics