Skip to main content

Research on Partner Selection for Technology Innovation Alliance in Knowledge Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 242))

  • 3077 Accesses

Abstract

Technology innovation alliance is such an effective mode to form the knowledge advantage from inter-organizational knowledge transfer. It is significant and difficult to select the right partner for the technology innovation alliance. We specifically use the entropy method to make a study on the partner selection issue of technology innovation alliance in knowledge perspective. Firstly, we establish an evaluation index system. And then, Index importance weight and entropy weight are combined to get the comprehensive weight of indexes, based on that, one comprehensive evaluation method is given. Finally, the example analysis shows the method is strongly operable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Teresa LJ, Shu H, Chia Y et al (2005) A strategic contingency model for technology alliance. Industrial Management & Data Systems 105(5):623–644

    Google Scholar 

  2. Khamseh HM, Jolly DR (2008) Knowledge transfer in alliances: Determinant factors. Journal of Knowledge Management 12(1):37–050

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dyer JH (2001) How to make strategic alliances Work. MIT Sloan Management Review 42:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bronder C, Pritzl R (1992) Developing strategic alliances: A conceptual framework for successful co-operation. European Management Journal 10(4):412–421

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mason C (1993) Strategic alliances: Partnering for success. Management Review 82:10–15

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brouthers KD, Brouthers LF, Wilkinson TJ (1995) Strategic alliances: Choose your partners. Long Range Planning 28(3):18–25

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daellenbach US, Davenport SJ (2004) Establishing trust during the formation of technology alliances. Journal Of Technology Transfer 29(2):187–202

    Google Scholar 

  8. Das TK, Teng BS (2000) Resource-based theory of strategic alliance. Journal of Management 26(1):31–61

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis JD (1990) Making strategic alliances to work. Research Technology Management 33:12–15

    Google Scholar 

  10. Slowinski G, Seelig G, Hull F (1996) Managing technology-based strategic alliances between large and small firms. SAM Advanced Management Journal 61:42–47

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brouthers KD, Brouthers LF, Wilkinson TJ (1995) Strategic alliances: Choose your partners. Long Range Planning 28:18–25

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wu W, Shih H, Chan H (2009) The analytic network process for partner selection criteria in strategic alliances. Expert Systems with Applications 36(3):4646–4653

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parkhe A (1993) Strategic alliance structuring: A game theory and transaction cost examination of inter-firm cooperation. The Academy of Management Journal 36:794–829

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bierly PE, Gallagher S (2007) Explaining alliance partner selection: Fit, trust and strategic expediency. Long Range Planning 40(2):134–153

    Google Scholar 

  15. Daellenbach US, Davenport SJ (2004) Establishing trust during the formation of technology alliances, The Journal of technology transfer 29(2):187–202

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaminski PC, De Oliveira AC, Lopes TM (2008) Knowledge transfer in product development processes: a case study in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) of the metal-mechanic sector from Sao Paulo, Brazil. Brazil Technovation 28(1):29–36

    Google Scholar 

  17. DeCarolis DM, Deeds DL (1999) The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal 20:953–968

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen CJ (2008) The effects of knowledge attribute, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance. R&D Management 34(3):311–321

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xiao Y, Gu X (2007) Research on selection method of knowledge chain partner. Science & Technology Progress and Policy (24):179–181 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 08AJY011), and the Sichuan University’s Special Research Program for the Philosophy Social Science from the Subordinate Universities of Ministry of Education’s Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. SKX201004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qifeng Wei .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wei, Q., Gu, X. (2014). Research on Partner Selection for Technology Innovation Alliance in Knowledge Perspective. In: Xu, J., Fry, J., Lev, B., Hajiyev, A. (eds) Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 242. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40081-0_105

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40081-0_105

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40080-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40081-0

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics