Skip to main content

Study on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Affect on Brand Trust and Purchase Intention After Brand Scandal

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 241))

Abstract

This thesis, through a questionnaire research methods, explored repair effects of corporate social responsibility activities after the brand scandal, such as improving product quality, philanthropy and donation money or equipments to students in remote regions and environmental protection in order to repair brand trust and consumption intention. Authors found that CSR activities had positive integrated effects on renewal brand trust and consumption intention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jiang Y, Chen Z (2012) Insurance effect about charitable donations affect on shareholder value in the event of company scandal — Based on listed companies’ denounced events. In: 2012 Academic Conference on Journal of Marketing Science

    Google Scholar 

  2. Niraj D, Jing L (2009) Brand crises: The roles of brand familiarity and crisis relevance in determining the impact on brand evaluations. Journal of Business Research 62:509–516

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dawar N, Pillutla MM (2000) Impact of product—harm crises on brand equity: The moderating role of consumer expectations. Journal of Marketing Research 37:215–226

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zheng F (2011) Rsearch on the innuence of protecting brand equity in the event of defensible product harm crisis by appropriate remedial response: Moderating and mediating effiects. Nankai Business Review 14:69–79

    Google Scholar 

  5. Souto BF (2009) Crisis and corporate social responsibility: Threat or opportunity? International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research 2:36–50

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vanhamme J, Grobben B (2009) “Too Good to be True!” The effectiveness of CSR history in countering negative publicity. Journal of Business Ethics 85:273–283

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sen S, Bhattacharya CB (2001) Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research 38:225–243

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou Y, Xiao W, Luo W et al (2007) Corporate social responsibility behavior impact on consumers’ evaluation about corporate reputation. Modern Management Science 12:56–59

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xie P, Zhou Z (2009) Empirical study on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and consumer purchase intention. Nankai Business Review 12:64–70

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luo X, Bhattacharya CB (2006) Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing 70:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  11. Laroche M, Sadokierski R (1994) Role of confidence in a multi-brand model of intentions for a high-involvement service. Journal of Business Research 29:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  12. McAllister DJ (1995) Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. The Academy of Management Journal 38:24–59

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gu H, Song Y (2009) Moral rational or intuitive: A study on the reaction of consumers for corporate social responsibility behavior. Journal of Marketing Science 5:17–35

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sirdeshmukh D, Singh J, Sabol B (2002) Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing 66:15–37

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xie P, Zhou Z (2009) Empirical study on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and consumer purchase intention in China. Nankai Business Review 12:64–70

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological reaesrch: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6):1173–1182

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunya Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, C., Yu, W. (2014). Study on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Affect on Brand Trust and Purchase Intention After Brand Scandal. In: Xu, J., Fry, J., Lev, B., Hajiyev, A. (eds) Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 241. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40078-0_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics