Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 241))

  • 2687 Accesses

Abstract

For the time–cost tradeoff problem, if the involved super large-scale CPM network is simplified, then any correlative algorithm which used to solve the problem is simplified too. According to the idea, firstly, property of free float and relation of free float and path length is analyzed, and some new conceptions and free float theorem are deduced; secondly, an algorithm of simplifying the super large-scale network in time–cost tradeoff problem is designed by using these conceptions and the theorem, and validity of the algorithm is proved; finally, application of the algorithm is discussed by illustration. The theoretic proof and illustration show that if the algorithm is used to simplify the time–cost tradeoff problem, any correlative algorithm which used to solve the problem could be greatly simplified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Yang J (1995) Construction project schedule control. Earthquake Publisher, Beijing (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang JW, Xu Y, He ZW et al (2007) A review on the time/cost trade-offs problem in project scheduling. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 1:92–97

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang JW, Xu Y, He ZW et al (2006) Discrete time/cost trade-offs in project scheduling with time-switch constraints. Chinese Journal of Management Science 2:58–64

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wu XL, Yin Z (2007) Solving time-cost trade-off model for activity network by minimum cost flow principle. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Nature Science Edition) 1:42–45

    Google Scholar 

  5. Szmerekovsky JG, Venkateshan P (2012) An integer programming formulation for the project scheduling problem with irregular time-cost tradeoffs. Computers and Operations Research 39:1402–1410

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mokhtari H, Kazemzadeh RB, Salmasnia A (2011) Time-cost tradeoff analysis in project management: An ant system approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 5:36–43

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang IT (2011) Stochastic time-cost tradeoff analysis: A distribution-free approach with focus on correlation and stochastic dominance. Automation in Construction 20:916–926

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hazir O, Haouari M, Erel E (2010) Robust scheduling and robustness measures for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem. European Journal of Operational Research 207:633–643

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klerides E, Hadjiconstantinou E (2010) A decomposition-based stochastic programming approach for the project scheduling problem under time/cost trade-off settings and uncertain durations. Computers & Operations Research 37:2131–2140

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anagnostopoulos KP, Kotsikas L (2010) Experimental evaluation of simulated annealing algorithms for the time-cost trade-off problem. Applied Mathematics and Computation 217:260–270

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elmaghraby SE (2000) On criticality and sensitivity in activity networks. European Journal of Operational Research 127:220–238

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elmaghraby SE (1995) Activity nets: A guided tour through some recent developments. European Journal of Operational Research 82:383–408

    Google Scholar 

  13. Elmaghraby SE (1977) Activity networks: Project planning and control by network models. Wiley publisher, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Elmaghraby SE, Kamburowski J (1990) On project representation and activity floats. Arabian Journal of Science and Engineering 15:627–637

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu ZY (2002) Discussion of ‘time-cost tradeoff’ optimization by using network planning technology. Construction & Design For Project 3:13–14

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fulkerson DR (1964) Scheduling in project networks. Tech. Report RAND memo (RM-4137 PR, RAND Corporation), Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wei GH, Fu JL, Zhou ZL (1987) Applied operational research. Fudan University Publisher, Shanghai (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhong W, Yin ZW, Lou N (2001) A new optimizing algorithm for the time-cost project network. Journal of Fudan University 40:456–460 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhixiong Su .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Su, Z., Qi, J., Kan, Z. (2014). Simplification of Large Scale Network in Time–cost Tradeoff Problem. In: Xu, J., Fry, J., Lev, B., Hajiyev, A. (eds) Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 241. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40078-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics