Skip to main content

A Communication Framework for Networked Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Art of Wireless Sensor Networks

Part of the book series: Signals and Communication Technology ((SCT))

Abstract

Underwater acoustic communications consume a significant amount of energy due to the high transmission power (10–50 \(\mathrm {W}\)) and long data packet transmission duration (0.1–1 \(\mathrm {s}\)). Mobile Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) can conserve energy by waiting for the ‘best’ network topology configuration, e.g., a favorable alignment, before starting to communicate. Due to the frequency-selective underwater acoustic ambient noise and high medium power absorption—which increases exponentially with distance—a shorter distance between AUVs translates into a lower transmission loss and a higher available bandwidth. By leveraging the predictability of AUV trajectories, a novel solution is proposed that optimizes communications by delaying packet transmissions in order to wait for a favorable network topology (thus trading end-to-end delay for energy and/or throughput). In addition, the proposed solution exploits the frequency-dependent radiation pattern of underwater acoustic transducers to reduce communication energy consumption. Our solution is implemented and evaluated through emulations, showing improved performance over some well-known geographic routing solutions and delay-tolerant networking solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Due to the peculiar ‘V’ shape of the underwater acoustic ambient noise and the high medium power absorption exponentially increasing with distance [35], a shorter distance between AUVs translates into a lower transmission loss and a higher available bandwidth.

  2. 2.

    “Quo vadis?” is a Latin phrase meaning “Where are you going?”.

  3. 3.

    Note that in underwater acoustics, power (or source level) is usually expressed using decibel (dB) scale, relative to the reference pressure level in underwater acoustics \(1\,\mu Pa\), i.e., the power induced by 1 \(\mu Pa\) pressure. The conversion expression for the source level \(SL\) re \(\mu Pa\) at the distance of \(1~{\mathrm {m}}\) of a compact source of \(P\) watts is \(SL=170.77+10\log _{10} P\).

  4. 4.

    Each packet sent by WHOI Micro-Modem consists of a number of frames where the maximum number depends on \(\xi \).

References

  1. I.F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, T. Melodia, Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw. (Elsevier) 3(3), 257–279 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Balasubramanian, B. Levine, A. Venkataramani, DTN routing as a resource allocation problem, in Proceedings of ACM Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications (SIGCOMM), 2007

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Blain, S. Lemieux, R. Houde, Implementation of a ROV navigation system using acoustic/Doppler sensors and Kalman filtering, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Engineering in the Ocean Environment (OCEANS), San Diego, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Burgess, B. Gallagher, D. Jensen, B.N. Levine, MaxProp: routing for vehicle-based disruption-tolerant networks, in Proceedings of Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), Barcelona, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Burleigh, A. Hooke, L. Torgerson, K. Fall, V. Cerf, B. Durst, K. Scott, H. Weiss, Delay-tolerant networking: an approach to interplanetary Internet. IEEE Commun. Mag. 41(6), 128–136 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Casella, R.L. Berger, Statistical Inference, 2nd edn. (Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Catipovic, Performance limitations in underwater acoustic telemetry. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 15, 205–216 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C.Y. Chan, M. Motani, An integrated energy efficient data retrieval protocol for underwater delay tolerant networks, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Engineering in the Ocean Environment (OCEANS)—Europe, Aberdeen, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Chen, P. Hickey, D. Pompili, Trajectory-aware communication solution for underwater gliders using WHOI micro-modems, in Proceedings of IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh, and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), Boston, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Chen, D. Pompili, QUO VADIS: QoS-aware underwater optimization framework for inter-vehicle communication using acoustic directional transducers, in Proceedings of IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh, and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), Salt Lake City, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Fall, A delay-tolerant network architecture for challenged Internets, in Proceedings of ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication (SIGCOMM), Karlsruhe, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  12. G.G. Finn, Routing and addressing problems in large metropolitan scale Internetworks, Technical report, ISI, Storrs, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Freitag, M. Grund, S. Singh, J. Partan, P. Koski, K. Ball, The WHOI micro-modem: an acoustic communications and navigation system for multiple platforms, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Engineering in the Ocean Environment (OCEANS), Washington DC, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  14. S.A.L. Glegg, R. Pirie, A. LaVigne, A study of ambient noise in shallow water, Florida Atlantic University Technical Report, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  15. Z. Guo, G. Colombi, B. Wang, J.H. Cui, D. Maggiorini, Adaptive routing in underwater delay/disruption tolerant sensor networks, in Proceedings of IEEE/IFIP Conference on Wireless on Demand Network Systems and Services (WONS), Garmisch-Partenkirchen, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  16. Z. Guo, B. Wang, J.H. Cui, Prediction assisted single-copy routing in underwater delay tolerant networks, in Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Miami, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  17. D.B. Kilfoyle, A.B. Baggeroer, The state of the art in underwater acoustic telemetry. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 25, 4–27 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. E. Kranakis, H. Singh, J. Urrutia, Compass routing on geometric networks, in Proceedings of Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry, Vancouver, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Luo, Z. Guo, W. Dong, F. Hong, Y. Zhao, LDB: localization with directional beacons for sparse 3D underwater acoustic sensor networks. J. Netw. 5(1), 28–38 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Lynch, Acoustical oceanography and shallow water acoustics, in Proceedings of Australian Acoustical Society Conference (ACOUSTICS), 2011

    Google Scholar 

  21. E. Magistretti, J. Kong, U. Lee, M. Gerla, P. Bellavista, A. Corradi, A mobile delay-tolerant approach to long-term energy-efficient underwater sensor networking, in Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Kowloon, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. Melodia, D. Pompili, I.F. Akyildiz, On the interdependence of distributed topology control and geographical routing in ad hoc and sensor networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 23(3), 520–532 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J.M. Montana, M. Stojanovic, M. Zorzi, Focused beam routing protocol for underwater acoustic networks, in Proceedings of ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks (WUWNet), San Francisco, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Partan, J. Kurose, B.N. Levine, A survey of practical issues in underwater networks, in Proceedings of ACM International Workshop on UnderWater Networks (WUWNet), Los Angeles, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Pompili, I.F. Akyildiz, A cross-layer communication solution for multimedia applications in underwater acoustic sensor networks, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor systems (MASS), Atlanta, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Porter, BELLHOP Gaussian Beam/Finite Element Beam Code. http://oalib.hlsresearch.com/Rays/index.html. Accessed 11 Jan 2012

  27. J. Proakis, J. Rice, E. Sozer, M. Stojanovic, Shallow water acoustic networks, in Encyclopedia of Telecommunications, ed. by J.G. Proakis (Wiley, New York, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. J.G. Proakis, E.M. Sozer, J.A. Rice, M. Stojanovic, Shallow water acoustic networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 39(11), 114–119 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. Quazi, W. Konrad, Underwater acoustic communication. IEEE Commun. Mag. 20, 24–29 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  30. S.M. Ross, Introduction to Probability Models, 8th edn. (Academic Press, San Diego, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  31. K.B. Smith, A. Tolstoy, Summary of results for swam’99 test cases, in Proceedings of a Shallow Water Acoustic Modeling Workshop (SWAM), Monterey, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  32. T. Spyropoulos, K. Psounis, C.S. Raghavendra, Spray and wait: an efficient routing scheme for intermittently connected mobile networks, in Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Delay-Tolerant Networking (WDTN), 2005

    Google Scholar 

  33. V. Srivastava, M. Motani, Cross-layer design: a survey and the road ahead. IEEE Commun. Mag. 43(12), 112–119 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Stojanovic, Acoustic (underwater) communications, in Encyclopedia of Telecommunications, ed. by J.G. Proakis (Wiley, New York, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. Stojanovic, On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel, in Proceedings of ACM International Workshop on UnderWater Networks (WUWNet), Los Angeles, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  36. H. Takagi, L. Kleinrock, Optimal transmission ranges for randomly distributed packet radio terminals. IEEE Trans. Commun. COM-32(3), 246–257 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  37. R.J. Urick, Principles of Underwater Sound (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  38. S. Williams, I. Mahon, Simultaneous localisation and mapping on the Great Barrier Reef, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), New Orleans, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  39. X. Xiang, Z. Zhou, X. Wang, Self-adaptive on demand geographic routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), Anchorage, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  40. P. Xie, J.H. Cui, L. Lao, VBF: vector-based forwarding protocol for underwater sensor networks, in Proceedings of IFIP Networking, Waterloo, 2005

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baozhi Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, B., Pompili, D. (2014). A Communication Framework for Networked Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. In: Ammari, H. (eds) The Art of Wireless Sensor Networks. Signals and Communication Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40066-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40066-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40065-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40066-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics