Abstract
In his article on economic policy, Stefan Schmalz looks into the assumption that there has been a slow re-orientation process in Brazil that favored the return of the developmentalist State. Accordingly an economic model with more State influence gained strength, quasi as a counterpart to what happened within the neo-liberal model in the early 1990s. The gradual and negotiated transition to a new developmental State model (novo desenvolvimentismo) was possible through a social democratic alliance at the parliamentary level after the economic crisis of the late 1990s. Under Lula the system obtained a new quality, above all through massive programs for infrastructure development (programas de aceleração do crescimento, PAC I and II). Nonetheless, this development model is still considered contradictory as environmental and rural conflicts remain unsolved. Thus, despite the income growth, the rural population is still excluded from the modernization project while the high concentration of land property continues to exist.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The term ABC refers to three villages of the urban hinterland of São Paulo: Santo André, São Bernardo do Campo and São Caetano do Sul.
References
Abu-El-Haj, J. (2007). From interdependence to neo-mercantilism Brazilian capitalism in the age of globalization. Latin American Perspectives, 34(5), 92–114.
Akin, C., & Kose, M. A. (2007). Changing natures of north–south linkages: Stylized facts and explanations (IMF Working Papers WP/07/280, Washington, DC).
Amaral, O. E. (2003). A Estrela não é mais Vermelha. As Mudanças do Programa Petistanos Anos 90. São Paulo: Garçoni.
Becker, J. (2008). Zwiespältige Verhältnisse: Progressive Regierungen und soziale Bewegungen in Südafrika und Brasilien. In S. Schmalz & A. Tittor (Eds.), Jenseits von Subcomandante Marcos und Hugo Chávez: Soziale Bewegungen zwischen Autonomie und Staat (pp. 155–178). Hamburg: VSA.
Bernecker, W. L., Pietschmann, H., & Zoller, R. (2000). Eine kleine Geschichte Brasiliens. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Biondi, A. (2008). Especial trabalho e renda I-IV. Accessed June 10, 2011, http://www.cartamaior.com.br/templates/
Boris, D. (2003). Die Transformation in Brasilien. Supplement to Zeitschrift Sozialismus, 32(11).
Boris, D. (2009). Lateinamerikas Politische Ökonomie. Aufbruch aus historischen Abhängigkeiten im 21. Jahrhundert? Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.
Burges, S. W. B. (2005). Bounded by the reality of trade: Practical limits to a South American region. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 18(3), 437–454.
Cervo, A. L., & Bueno, C. (2002). História da Política Exterior do Brasil. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasilía.
Datafolha. (2010). Lula bate novo recorde de popularidade. http://datafolha.folha.uol.com.br/po/ver_po.php?session=986
Tavares de Almeida, M. H. (2005). From Cardoso to Lula: The politics and policies of reform in democratic Brazil. Accessed March 25, 2010, http://www.wilsoncenter.org/news/docs/fromCardosotoLula.doc
De Oliveira, F. (2007, February 4). Lula e a hegemoniaàsavessas. Rio de Janeiro: O globo.
Diniz, E., & Boschi, R. (2004). Empresários, Interesses e Mercado. Dilemas do Desenvolvimento no Brasil. Belo Horizonte/Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFMG/IUPERJ.
Dombois, R., & Pries, L. (Eds.). (1999). Arbeitsbeziehungen zwischen Markt und Staat. Neue Arbeitsregimes im Transformationsprozess Lateinamerikas. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
Farhi, M., & Macedo Cintra, M. A. (2009). Crisis financiera internacional: contagio y respuestas regulatorias. Nueva Sociedad, 224, 105–127.
Filgueiras, L., & Gonçalves, R. (2007). A Economia Política do Governo Lula. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto.
Flynn, M. (2007). Between subimperialism and globalization: A case study in the internationalization of Brazilian capital. Latin American Perspectives, 34(9), 9–27.
Gentili, R. (2004). Sobre as Negociações da ALCA e da Mercosul. In L. T. Soares, E. Sader, R. Gentili, & C. Benjamin (Eds.), Governo Lula. Decifrando o enigma (pp. 105–118). São Paulo: Viramundo.
Governo Federal do Brasil. (2009). Programa de Aceleração do Crescimento 2007–2010. Accessed February 28, 2010, http://www.fazenda.gov.br/portugues/releases/2007/PAC.asp
Hardie, I. (2006). The power of the markets? The international bond markets and the 2002 elections in Brazil. Review of International Political Economy, 13(1), 53–77.
Hunter, W., & Power, T. J. (2007). Rewarding Lula: Executive power, social policy, and the Brazilian elections of 2006. Latin American Politics and Society, 49(1), 1–30.
Kregel, J. (2009). The global crisis and the implications for developing countries and the BRICs. Is the B really justified? Accessed August 11, 2013, http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/ppb_102.pdf
Leubolt, B., & Tittor, A. (2008). Semi-Periphere Sozialstaatlichkeit in Lateinamerika: Argentinien und Brasilien im historischen Vergleich. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik, 24(2), 116–136.
Lühmann, M., & Schmalz, S. (2010). Brasilien als Global Player auf den Weltagrarmärkten: Potentiale und Risiken. In G. Meyer & A. Thimm (Eds.), Die globale Nahrungsmittelkrise – Gewinner und Verlierer in Entwicklungsländern, Veröffentlichungen des IA Dritte Welt, 20 (pp. 48–69). Mainz: Universität Mainz.
Machado, J., & Neto, B. (2003). Die zwei Seelen der Regierung Lula. Inprekor, 378/379, Mai/Juni 2003. Accessed July 23, 2013, http://www.inprekorr.de/378-brasil.htm
Marques, R. M., & Nakatani, P. (2009). O Brasil e a criseeconômica: Apenas uma marolinha? Accessed February 28, 2010, http://www.pucsp.br/imprensa/boletim/acontece/maio/07_05_09.html
Morais, L., & Saad-Filho, A. (2005). Lula and the continuity of neoliberalism in Brazil: Strategic choice, economic imperative or political schizophrenia? Historical Materialism, 13(1), 3–32.
Nogueira Batista, P., Jr. (2005). O Brasil e a Economia Internacional. Recuperação e Defesa da Autonomia Nacional. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Campus.
Novy, A. (2001). Brasilien: Die Unordnung der Peripherie. Von der Sklavenhaltergesellschaft zur Diktatur des Geldes. Wien: Promedia.
Novy, A. (2008). Die Rückkehr des Entwicklungsstaates in Brasilien. Das Argument, 50(4), 361–373.
Panizza, F. (2004). “Brazil Needs to Change”: Change as iteration and the iteration of change in Brazil’s 2002 presidential election. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 23(4), 465–482.
Paulani, L. M. (2008). Brasil delivery. São Paulo: Boitempo.
Pochmann, M. (2009). O Trabalho na Crise Econômica no Brasil: Primeiros Sinais. Estudos Avançados, 23(2), 41–52.
Pont, R. (2003). Hoffnung für Brasilien. Beteiligungshaushalt und Weltsozialforum in Porto Alegre. Entwicklung der PT und Lulas Wahlsieg. Köln: Neuer ISP Verlag.
Rocha, G. M. (1994). Redefining the role of the bourgeoisie in dependent capitalist development. Privatization and liberalization in Brazil. Latin American Perspectives, 21(1), 72–98.
Rocha, G. M. (2002). Neo-dependency in Brazil. New Left Review, 43(4), 5–33.
Rodrigues, A. T. (2003). Diretas Já. O grito presona garganta. São Paulo: Fundação Perseu Abramo.
Ross Schneider, B. (2009). Big business in Brazil: Leveraging natural endowments and state support for international expansion. In L. Brainard & L. Martinez-Diaz (Eds.), Brazil as an economic superpower? Understanding Brazil’s changing role in the global political economy (pp. 159–186). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Sader, E. (2005). Brasiliens Anpassung an den Weltmarkt. Das Argument, 47(4), 532–538.
Salama, P. (2009). Argentina, Brasil e México diante da Crise Internacional. Estudos Avançados, Crise Internacional I, 65, São Paulo.
Schmalz, S. (2008). Brasilien in der Weltwirtschaft. Die Regierung Lula und die neue Süd-Süd-Kooperation. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
Schmalz, S., & Ebenau, M. (2011). Auf dem Sprung. Brasilien, Indien, China. Zur gesellschaftlichen Transformation in der Krise. Berlin: Dietz.
Sicsú, J. (2007). PAC: quatro anos depois o governo tenta mudar o rumo. In J. Sicsú (Ed.), Arrecadação (de onde vem?) e Gastos Públicos (para onde vão?). São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.
Souza, N. A. (2005). A Longa Agonia da Dependência. Economia Brasileira Contemporânea. São Paulo: Editora Alfa-Omega.
Stedile, J. P. (2007). The class struggles in Brazil: The perspective of the MST. In L. Panitch & C. Leys (Eds.), Socialist register 2008 (pp. 193–217). London: Merlin Press.
Steinhilber, J. (2008, November). Den Crash überleben – Brasiliens Weg aus der Finanzkrise. Brasil-Info. São Paulo: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2009). Major foreign holders of treasury securities. Accessed May 29, 2013, http://www.treas.gov/tic/mfh.txt
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schmalz, S. (2016). The Brazilian Economic Policy: From the Crisis of Import Substitution to the Programa de Aceleração do Crescimento . In: de la Fontaine, D., Stehnken, T. (eds) The Political System of Brazil. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40023-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40023-0_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40022-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40023-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)