Advertisement

Understanding Foot Function During Stance Phase by Bayesian Network Based Causal Inference

  • Myagmarbayar NerguiEmail author
  • Jun Inoue
  • Murai Chieko
  • Wenwei Yu
  • U. Rajendra Acharya
Chapter
Part of the Intelligent Systems Reference Library book series (ISRL, volume 56)

Abstract

Understanding the biomechanics of the human foot during each stage of walking is important for the objective evaluation of movement dysfunction, accuracy of diagnosis, and prediction of foot impairment. Extracting causal relations from amongst the muscle activities, toe trajectories, and plantar pressures during walking assists in recognizing several disease conditions, and understanding the hidden complexity of human foot functions, thus, facilitating appropriate therapy and treatment. To extract these relations, we applied the Bayesian Network (BN) model to data collected in the stance phase of walking. For a better understanding of foot function, the experimental data were divided into three stages (initial contact, loading response to mid-stance, and terminal stance to pre-swing). BNs were constructed for these three stages of data for normal walking and simulated hemiplegic walking, then compared and analyzed. Results showed that BNs extracted could express the underlying mechanism of foot function.

Keywords

Bayesian network Stance phase Muscle activities Foot function 

References

  1. 1.
    Takemura H, Iwama H, Ueda J, Matumoto Y, Ogasawara T (2003) A study of the toe function for human walking. JSME Symp Welfare Eng 3:97–100Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaapel-Bargas A, Woolf R, Cornwall M, McPoil T (1998) The windlass mechanism during normal walking and passive first metatarsalphalangeal joint extension. Clin Biomech 13(3):190–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nishiwaki K, Kagami S, Kuniyoshi Y, Inaba M, Inoue H (2002) Toe joints that enhance bipedal and fullbody motion of humanoid robots. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2002 IEEE international conference on robotics & automation (ICRA02), Washington, DC, pp. 3105—3110, 11–15 May 2002Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hutton WC, Dhanendran M (1979) A Study of the distribution of load under the normal foot during walking. Int Orthop (SICOT) 3(2):153–157Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kong K, Tomizuka M, (2008) Estimation of abnormalities in a human gait using sensor-embedded shoes. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics, 2–5 July 2008Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Warren GL, Maher RM, Higbie EJ (2004) Temporal patterns of plantar pressures and lower-leg muscle activity during walking: effect of speed. Gait Posture 19:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nergui M, Murai C, Koike Y, Yu W, Acharya R (2011) Probabilistic information structure of human walking. J Med Syst 35(5):835–844, SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goldberg EJ, Nepture RR (2007) Compensatory strategies during normal walking in response to muscle weakness and increased hip joint stiffness. Gait Posture 25:360–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jensen FV (2001) Bayesian networks and decision graphs. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nikovski D (2000) Constructing bayesian networks for medical diagnosis from incomplete and partially correct statistics. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 12(4):509–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suojanen M, Andreassen S, Olesen KG (2001) A method for diagnosing multiple diseases in MUNIN. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48(5):522–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meloni A, Ripoli A, Positano V, Landini L (2009) Mutual information preconditioning improves structure learning of bayesian networks from medical databases. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 13(6):984–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meloni A, Landini L, Ripoli A, Positano V (2009) Improved learning of bayesian networks in biomedicine. Paper presented at the Ninth international conference on intelligent systems design and applications, 30 Nov–2 Dec 2009Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rose C, Smaili C, Charpillet F (2005) A dynamic bayesian network for handling uncertainty in a decision support system adapted to the monitoring of patients treated by hemodialysis. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 17th IEEE international conference on tools with artificial intelligence (ICTAI’05), 14–16 Nov 2005Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nan B, Okamoto M, Tsuji T (2009) A hybrid motion classification approach for EMG-based human—robot interfaces using bayesian and neural networks. IEEE Trans Rob 25(3):502–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Athanasiou M, Clark JY (2007) A bayesian network model for the diagnosis of the caring procedure for wheelchair users with spinal injury. Paper presented at the twentieth IEEE international symposium on computer-based medical systems (CBMS’07), 20–22 June 2007Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu W, Yamaguchi H, Maruishi M, Yokoi H, Mano Y, Kakazu Y (2002) EMG automatic switch for FES control for hemiplegics using artificial neural network. Elsevier. Robot Auton Syst 40(2):213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ebara K, Ohashi M, Kubota T (1999) Rehabilitation program for walking impairment. Ishiyaku Publishers Inc, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Neapolitan RE (2004) Learning bayesian networks. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bøttcher SG, Dethlefsen C (2003) Learning bayesian networks with R third Edition. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the international workshop on distributed statistical computing, 20–22 Mar 2003Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cheng C, Ansari R, Khokhar A (2004) Cyclic articulated human motion tracking by sequential ancestral simulation. Paper presented at the IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR’04), 27 June–2 July 2004Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Myagmarbayar Nergui
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jun Inoue
    • 4
  • Murai Chieko
    • 4
  • Wenwei Yu
    • 4
  • U. Rajendra Acharya
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate School of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Medical System Engineering DepartmentChiba UniversityChibaJapan
  2. 2.Department of ECENgee Ann PolytechnicClementiSingapore
  3. 3.Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of MalayaLumpurMalaysia
  4. 4.Graduate School of Engineering, Medical System Engineering DepartmentChiba UniversityChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations