Skip to main content

Understanding Foot Function During Stance Phase by Bayesian Network Based Causal Inference

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 5858 Accesses

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems Reference Library ((ISRL,volume 56))

Abstract

Understanding the biomechanics of the human foot during each stage of walking is important for the objective evaluation of movement dysfunction, accuracy of diagnosis, and prediction of foot impairment. Extracting causal relations from amongst the muscle activities, toe trajectories, and plantar pressures during walking assists in recognizing several disease conditions, and understanding the hidden complexity of human foot functions, thus, facilitating appropriate therapy and treatment. To extract these relations, we applied the Bayesian Network (BN) model to data collected in the stance phase of walking. For a better understanding of foot function, the experimental data were divided into three stages (initial contact, loading response to mid-stance, and terminal stance to pre-swing). BNs were constructed for these three stages of data for normal walking and simulated hemiplegic walking, then compared and analyzed. Results showed that BNs extracted could express the underlying mechanism of foot function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Takemura H, Iwama H, Ueda J, Matumoto Y, Ogasawara T (2003) A study of the toe function for human walking. JSME Symp Welfare Eng 3:97–100

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaapel-Bargas A, Woolf R, Cornwall M, McPoil T (1998) The windlass mechanism during normal walking and passive first metatarsalphalangeal joint extension. Clin Biomech 13(3):190–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nishiwaki K, Kagami S, Kuniyoshi Y, Inaba M, Inoue H (2002) Toe joints that enhance bipedal and fullbody motion of humanoid robots. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2002 IEEE international conference on robotics & automation (ICRA02), Washington, DC, pp. 3105—3110, 11–15 May 2002

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hutton WC, Dhanendran M (1979) A Study of the distribution of load under the normal foot during walking. Int Orthop (SICOT) 3(2):153–157

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kong K, Tomizuka M, (2008) Estimation of abnormalities in a human gait using sensor-embedded shoes. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics, 2–5 July 2008

    Google Scholar 

  6. Warren GL, Maher RM, Higbie EJ (2004) Temporal patterns of plantar pressures and lower-leg muscle activity during walking: effect of speed. Gait Posture 19:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nergui M, Murai C, Koike Y, Yu W, Acharya R (2011) Probabilistic information structure of human walking. J Med Syst 35(5):835–844, Springer

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldberg EJ, Nepture RR (2007) Compensatory strategies during normal walking in response to muscle weakness and increased hip joint stiffness. Gait Posture 25:360–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jensen FV (2001) Bayesian networks and decision graphs. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Nikovski D (2000) Constructing bayesian networks for medical diagnosis from incomplete and partially correct statistics. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 12(4):509–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Suojanen M, Andreassen S, Olesen KG (2001) A method for diagnosing multiple diseases in MUNIN. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48(5):522–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meloni A, Ripoli A, Positano V, Landini L (2009) Mutual information preconditioning improves structure learning of bayesian networks from medical databases. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 13(6):984–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meloni A, Landini L, Ripoli A, Positano V (2009) Improved learning of bayesian networks in biomedicine. Paper presented at the Ninth international conference on intelligent systems design and applications, 30 Nov–2 Dec 2009

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rose C, Smaili C, Charpillet F (2005) A dynamic bayesian network for handling uncertainty in a decision support system adapted to the monitoring of patients treated by hemodialysis. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 17th IEEE international conference on tools with artificial intelligence (ICTAI’05), 14–16 Nov 2005

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nan B, Okamoto M, Tsuji T (2009) A hybrid motion classification approach for EMG-based human—robot interfaces using bayesian and neural networks. IEEE Trans Rob 25(3):502–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Athanasiou M, Clark JY (2007) A bayesian network model for the diagnosis of the caring procedure for wheelchair users with spinal injury. Paper presented at the twentieth IEEE international symposium on computer-based medical systems (CBMS’07), 20–22 June 2007

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yu W, Yamaguchi H, Maruishi M, Yokoi H, Mano Y, Kakazu Y (2002) EMG automatic switch for FES control for hemiplegics using artificial neural network. Elsevier. Robot Auton Syst 40(2):213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ebara K, Ohashi M, Kubota T (1999) Rehabilitation program for walking impairment. Ishiyaku Publishers Inc, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  20. Neapolitan RE (2004) Learning bayesian networks. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bøttcher SG, Dethlefsen C (2003) Learning bayesian networks with R third Edition. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the international workshop on distributed statistical computing, 20–22 Mar 2003

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng C, Ansari R, Khokhar A (2004) Cyclic articulated human motion tracking by sequential ancestral simulation. Paper presented at the IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR’04), 27 June–2 July 2004

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myagmarbayar Nergui .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nergui, M., Inoue, J., Chieko, M., Yu, W., Acharya, U.R. (2014). Understanding Foot Function During Stance Phase by Bayesian Network Based Causal Inference. In: Dua, S., Acharya, U., Dua, P. (eds) Machine Learning in Healthcare Informatics. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 56. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40017-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40017-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40016-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40017-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics