Application of Fuzzy Logic Control for Regulation of Glucose Level of Diabetic Patient

  • K. Y. ZhuEmail author
  • W. D. Liu
  • Y. Xiao
Part of the Intelligent Systems Reference Library book series (ISRL, volume 56)


Diabetes can lead to many complications. If a patient cannot control his or her glucose level properly, he or she may suffer serious consequences. The result may be ketosis, which is normally due to an increase of acetone (a toxic acid product) and may lead to a situation such as diabetic coma. A fuzzy logic control system for the regulation of glucose level for diabetic patients is proposed in this chapter. A mathematical model describing the relationship between the human glucose level, insulin, and food is first presented. Then, a generalized fuzzy logic controller, including a set of fuzzy logic rules, is introduced to regulate glucose levels for diabetic patients. Following the fuzzy logic controller, simulation is presented. The results show that the fuzzy logic control is effective for handling the glucose level based on feedback scheme.


Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Fuzzy Logic Controller Continuous Glucose Monitoring Insulin Pump Fuzzy Logic Control 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schietz M et al (2001) Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Eng J Med 345(19):1359–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Diabetes Association (1998) Economic consequences of diabetes mellitus in the US in 1997. Diabetes Care 21(2):296–309Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thomson S, Beaven D, Jamieson M, Snively S, Howl A, Christophersen A (2001) Diabetes New Zealand Inc. Type II diabetes: managing for better health outcomes. PriceWaterHouseCoopers reportGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chase JG, Lam ZH, Lee JY, Hwang KS (2002) Active insulin infusion control of the blood glucose derivative. In: Seventh international conference on control, automation, robotics and vision (ICARCV’02), Singapore, 2–5 Dec 2002Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kienitz K, Yoneyama T (1993) Robust controller for insulin pumps based on H-infinity theory. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 38(1):57–61Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lam ZH, Hwang KS, Lee JY, Chase JG, Wake GC (2002) Active insulin infusion using optimal and derivative-weighted control. Med Eng Phy 24(10):663–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bode B et al (2004) Alarms based on real-time sensor glucose values alert patients to hypo- and hyperglycemia: the guardian continuous glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther 6(2):105–113Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bode BW et al (1999) Continuous glucose monitoring used to adjust diabetes therapy improves glycosylated hemoglobin: a pilot study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 46:183–190Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaufman FR et al (2001) A pilot study of the continuous glucose monitoring system: clinical decisions and glycemic control after its use in pediatric type 1 diabetic subjects. Diabetes Care 24(12):2030Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ludvigsson J, Hanas R (2003) Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring improved metabolic control in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes: a controlled crossover study. Pediatrics 5(1):933–938Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Derr R, Garrett E, Stacy G et al (2003) Is HbA1c affected by glycemic instability. Diabetes Care 26(10):2728–2733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lenhard MJ, Reeves GD (2001) Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: a comprehensive review of insulin pump therapy. Arch Intern Med 161(19):2293–2300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davies AG, Baun JD (1988) A decade of insulin infusion pumps. Arch Dis Child 63(3):329–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mecklenburg R, Benson J, Becker N, Brazel P, Fredlund P, Metz R, Nielson R, Sanner C, Steenrod W (1982) Clinical use of the insulin infusion pump in 100 patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 307(9):513–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Plotnick LP, Brancati FL, Clark LM, Erlinger T (2003) Safety and effectiveness of insulin pump therapy in children and adolescents with type I diabetes. Diabetes Care 26(4):1142–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Doran CV, Chase JG, Shaw GM, Moorhead KT, Hudson NH (2005) Derivative weighted active insulin control algorithms and intensive care unit trials. Control Eng Pract 13(9):1129–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bergman RN, Finegood DT, Ader M (1985) Assessment of insulin sensitivity in vivo. Endocr Rev 6(1):45–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kienitz K, Yoneyama T (1993) Robust controller for insulin pumps based on H-infinity theory. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 40(11):1133–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cobelli C, Nucci G, DelPrato S (1999) Physiological simulation model of the glucose insulin system. In: IEEE conference on engineering in medicine and biology, Atlanta, Georgia, 13–16 Oct 1999Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronic and Computer EngineeringNgee Ann PolytechnicSingaporeRepublic of Singapore
  2. 2.Information and Communication DepartmentShenyang University of Chemical TechnologyShenyangChina

Personalised recommendations