Abstract
Remember from Chap. 4 that coincidental quality is free as it is built into the product by product development and maintenance. If we ask product development and maintenance for the right level of quality or, respectively, risk, it is most often not easy to get insightful and comprehensive answers. However, we still need transparency about quality and risk to be sure that investments into resources (people, money, time, etc.) are sustainable. Ultimately, we need trustworthiness of our ICT landscape and its components.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References and Links
Boland T, Cleraux C, Fong E (2010) Toward a preliminary framework for assessing the trustworthiness of software. Software and Systems Division, Information Technology Laboratory, NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
Wagner S (2013) Software product quality control. Springer, Berlin
Wieczorek M, Naujoks U, Bartlett B (eds) (2002) Business continuity—IT risk management for international corporations. Springer, Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wieczorek, M., Vos, D., Bons, H. (2014). The Benefit of RiSSQ, Balancing Quality and Risk. In: Systems and Software Quality. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39971-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39971-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39970-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39971-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)