Skip to main content
Book cover

Die Urologie pp 497–502Cite as

Indikation zur interventionellen Therapie bei Urolithiasis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 417 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Medizin ((SRM))

Zusammenfassung

Harnleitersteine führen in der Regel zu einer Abflussstörung der betroffenen Nieren und werden meist aufgrund von Schmerzen unmittelbar einer zumindest medikamentösen Therapie zugeführt. Unklarer ist die Situation bei den Nierensteinen, die teils über Jahre asymptomatisch bleiben und trotz Fehlen von Risikofaktoren beobachtet werden können. Wenn eine Therapie erforderlich wird, steht meist die komplette Reihe minimalinvasiver Verfahren, von ESWL über URS hin zur PCNL, zur Verfügung. Faktoren, welche die Entscheidung für ein Therapieverfahren beeinflussen sind Steingröße, Steinlokalisation, Steinzusammensetzung sofern bekannt, Risikofaktoren, Expertise und Patientenpräferenz.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   269.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Al-Awadi KA, Abdul Halim H, Kehinde EO et al (1999) Steinstrasse: a comparison of incidence with and without J stenting and the effect of J stenting on subsequent management. BJU Int 84(6):618–621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, Denstedt JD, Grasso M, Gutierrez-Aceves J, Kahn RI, Leveillee RJ, Lingeman JE, Macaluso JN Jr, Munch LC, Nakada SY, Newman RC, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Teichman J, Woods JR (2001) Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol 166(6):2072–2080, Erratum in: J Urol 2002 Apr;167(4):1805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Albanis S, Ather HM, Papatsoris AG et al (2009) Inversion, hydration and diuresis during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: does it improve the stone-free rate for lower pole stone clearance? Urol Int 83(2):211–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson L, Sylven M (1983) Small renal caliceal calculi as a cause of pain. J Urol 130(4):752–753

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt B, Ostri P, Lange P et al (1993) Painful caliceal calculi. The treatment of small nonobstructingcaliceal calculi in patients with symptoms. Scand J Urol Nephrol 27(1):75–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Lam JS, Schulam PG (2008) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater–is this the new frontier? J Urol 179(3):981–984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burgher A, Beman M, Holtzman JL et al (2004) Progression of nephrolithiasis: long-term outcomes with observation of asymptomatic calculi. J Endourol 18(6):534–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins JW, Keeley FX (2002) Is there a role for prophylactic shock wave lithotripsy for asymptomatic calyceal stones? Curr Opin Urol 12(4):281–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geavlete P, Georgescu D, Niţă G, Mirciulescu V, Cauni V (2006) Complications of 2735 retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy procedures: a single-center experience. J Endourol 20(3):179–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glowacki LS, Beecroft ML, Cook RJ et al (1992) The natural history of asymptomatic urolithiasis. J Urol 147(2):319–321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goel R, Aron M, Kesarwani PK et al (2005) Percutaneous antegrade removal of impacted upper-ureteral calculi: still the treatment of choice in developing countries. J Endourol 19(1):54–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal R, Dubey D, Khurana N et al (2006) Does the type of steinstrasse predict the outcome of expectant therapy? Indian J Urol 22(2):135–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubner W, Porpaczy P (1990) Treatment of caliceal calculi. Br J Urol 66(1):9–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyams ES, Munver R, Bird VG, Uberoi J, Shah O (2010) Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol 24(10):1583–1588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inci K, Sahin A, Islamoglu E et al (2007) Prospective long − term follow up of patients with asymptomatic lower pole caliceal stones. J Urol 177(6):2189–2192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley FX Jr, Tilling K, Elves A et al (2001) Preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial of prophylactic shock wave lithotripsy for small asymptomatic renal calyceal stones. BJU Int 87(1):1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klingler HC, Kramer G, Lodde M et al (2003) Stone treatment and coagulopathy. Eur Urol 43(1):75–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kosar A, Ozturk A, Serel TA et al (1999) Effect of vibration massage therapy after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with lower caliceal stones. J Endourol 13(10):705–707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madbouly K, Sheir KZ, Elsobky E (2001) Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction? J Urol 165(5):1415–1418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manikandan R, Gall Z, Gunendran T et al (2007) Do anatomic factors pose a significant risk in the formation of lower pole stones? Urology 69(4):620–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mee SL, Thuroff JW (1988) Small caliceal stones: is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy justified? J Urol 139(5):908–910

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearle MS, Lingeman JE, Leveillee R, Kuo R, Preminger GM et al (2005) Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol 173(6):2005–2009, republished J Urol 2008 May;179(5 Suppl):S69–73)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preminger GM (2006) Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy. Urol Res 34(2):108–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG et al (2007) Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol 52(6):1610–1631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Resim S, Ekerbicer HC, Ciftci A (2005) Role of tamsulosin in treatment of patients with steinstrasse developing after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 66(5):945–948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sayed MA, el-Taher AM, Aboul-Ella HA et al (2001) Steinstrasse after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: aetiology, prevention and management. BJU Int 88(7):675–678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B et al (2009) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009(4), CD007044

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumino Y, Mimata H, Tasaki Y et al (2002) Predictors of lower pole renal stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 168(4 Pt 1):1344–1347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Xia S, Lu J et al (2008) Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy. J Endourol 22(5):913–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiselius HG (2008) How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones? J Endourol 22(2):249–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tolley DA (1993) Consensus of lithotriptor terminology. World J Urol 11(1):37–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Türk C, Knoll T, Petric A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Straub M, Members of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Office (2013) Guidelines on urolithiasis. In: EAU Guidelines, edition presented at the 28th EAU annual congress, Mailand

    Google Scholar 

  • Watterson JD, Girvan AR, Cook AJ et al (2002) Safety and efficacy of holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy in patients with bleeding diatheses. J Urol 168(2):442–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Knoll .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knoll, T. (2016). Indikation zur interventionellen Therapie bei Urolithiasis. In: Michel, M., Thüroff, J., Janetschek, G., Wirth, M. (eds) Die Urologie. Springer Reference Medizin. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39940-4_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39940-4_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39939-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39940-4

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics