Skip to main content

Simulating Opinion Dynamics in Land Use Planning

  • Conference paper
Advances in Social Simulation

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 229))

  • 1724 Accesses

Abstract

During a process of spatial planning multiple actors meet in a decision making process trying to satisfy as much as possible their individual desires and goals. Diffusion of opinions is considered an important factor in this process. A behavioural approach that represent the diffusion and distribution of opinions are absent in most spatial ABMs. This research presents a novel approach to simulating spatial opinions dynamics based on an agent based implementation of the Deffuant Weisbuch model. The model explicitly deals with spatial heterogeneity in opinions as well as heterogeneity in the willingness of agents to adapt their opinions. The model is demonstrated for a hypothetical spatial allocation problem in a study area in the south-east of the Netherlands. Three different scenarios representing different levels of willingness to cooperate within the population of agents are worked out. The results showed that explicit spatial opinion patterns can be simulated which are in line with what would be expected from the scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rogers, E.: Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Strang, D., Soule, S.A.: Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology 24, 265–290 (1998); ArticleType: research-article / Full publication date: 1998 / Copyright 1998 Annual Reviews

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kiesling, E., Günther, M., Stummer, C., Wakolbinger, L.: Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review. Central European Journal of Operations Research 20, 183–230 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hagerstrand, T.: Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. [s.n.], Chicago (1967); Monograph Wageningen UR Library

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berger, T.: Agent-based spatial models applied to agriculture: A simulation tool for technology diffusion, resource use changes, and policy analysis. Agricultural Economics 25(2-3), 245–260 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Parker, C., Manson, S., Janssen, M., Hoffmann, M., Deadman, P.: Multi-agent system models for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93, 316–340 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Matthews, R., Gilbert, N., Roach, A., Polhill, J., Gotts, N.: Agent-based land-use models: a review of applications. Landscape Ecology 22, 1447–1459 (2007), doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9135-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Latane, B.: The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist 36, 343 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G.: Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Advances in Complex Systems 3, 87–98 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weisbuch, G., Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Nadal, J.P.: Interacting Agents and Continuous Opinions Dynamics. In: Cowan, R., Jonard, N. (eds.) Heterogenous Agents, Interactions and Economic Performance. LNEMS, vol. 521, pp. 225–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Lorenz, J.: Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A survey. International Journal of Modern Physics C 18, 1819–1838 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lorenz, J.: Consensus strikes back in the hegselmann-krause model of continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics driven by various ways of averaging. Computational Economics 25, 381–405 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Martins, A.: Continuous opinions and discrete actions in opinion dynamics problems. International Journal of Modern Physics C 19 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Martins, A.: Bayesian updating rules in continuous opinion dynamics models. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2009, P02017 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Delre, S.A., Jager, W., Bijmolt, T.H.A., Janssen, M.A.: Will it spread or not? the effects of social influences and network topology on innovation diffusion. Journal of Product Innovation Management 27, 267–282 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Salzarulo, L.: A continuous opinion dynamics model based on the principle of meta-contrast. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martins, A., Pereira, C., Vicente, R.: An opinion dynamics model for the diffusion of innovations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 388, 3225–3232 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ligtenberg, A., Wachowicz, M., Bregt, A.K., Beulens, A., Kettenis, D.: Design and application of a multi-agent system for simulation of multi-actor spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Management 71, 43–55 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ligtenberg, A., Beulens, A., Kettenis, D., Bregt, A.K., Wachowicz, M.: Simulating knowledge sharing in spatial planning: an agent-based approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design (2009) (advance online publication)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leenders, R.T.A.J.: Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: constructing the weight matrix. Social Networks 24, 21–47 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Van der Horst, D.: Nimby or not? exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energy Policy 35, 2705–2714 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dear, M., Taylor, S.M., Hall, G.B.: External effects of mental health facilities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70, 342–352 (1980), doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01318.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arend Ligtenberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ligtenberg, A., Bregt, A.K. (2014). Simulating Opinion Dynamics in Land Use Planning. In: Kamiński, B., Koloch, G. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 229. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39829-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39829-2_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39828-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39829-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics