Abstract
In early 2007, China officially announced that within the past decade it had embraced mass higher education. This meant that the Chinese higher education system became the largest aggregate higher education system in the world surpassing the American system. Many higher education researchers around the world wondered how this dramatic expansion could have happened in such a short timeline. So far, this expansion is generally analyzed in the literature as a strictly top-down process (and purely based on an economic rationale) triggered and commanded by the central government policy. In this chapter, we provide insight into this change process and highlight how the Chinese government employed a wide range of policy instruments to encourage growth. The momentum for the change was gradually built up at the institutional level and further encouraged through the expansion policy.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The Great Leap Forward period between 1958 and 1960 represented a bold and idealistic attempt to achieve an accelerated social development and economic growth. In this period, higher education enjoyed rapid development, as seen as a means of “achieving greater, faster, better and more economical results.” The new policy stipulated that provincial governments could make decision on creation of a new higher education institution, if there was no requirement of central resources. Each province took the initiative to create new provincial level institutions, which resulted in an increase of nearly six-fold in the aggregate total of Chinese higher education institutions. Most of the new institutions were of such types as engineering, teacher training, agriculture, and medicine (traditional Chinese medicine in particular), whose share took 88.4 % of the increased total. The Great Leap Forward exhausted the human and material resources of higher education and led to a sharp decline in the quality, thus a period of adjustment followed to reverse this trend of development. Between 1961 and 1963, the government shut down 882 higher education institutions, of which 773 were engineering, teacher training, medical, and agriculture institutions.
References
Central Committee of Chinese Communist Party and State Council (1993) Zhongguo jiaoyu gaige he fazhan gangyao [Outline for Educational Reform and Development in China]. http://www.edu.cn/special/showarticle.php?id=298. Accessed 16 Sept 2001
China Youth Daily (2006) Difang zhengfu weishenme hui bei kuo zhao chonghun le tou [Why were local governments crazy in expanding higher education enrolment]? May 18: C-02
Ding X, Min W (1999) Guimo xiaoyi lilun yu gaodeng jiaoyu jiegou tiaozheng [Theory of scale economy and higher education structural adjustment]. In: Chen XF (ed) Zhongguo gaodeng jiaoyu yanjiu 50 nian: 1949-1999 [Higher Education Research in China for 50 Years: 1949–1999]. Educational Science Publishing House, Beijing, pp 1074–1079
Gornitzka A (1999) Governmental policies and organizational change in higher education. High Educ 38(1):5–31
Hood Christopher C (1983) The Tools of Government. MacMillan, London
Kang N (2000) Dangqian wo guo gaodeng jiaoyu tizhi gaige yu jiegou tiaozhen de lilun jichu [On the theoretical basis for the structural reform and readjustment of higher education in china]. Jiaoyu yanjiu [Educational Research] 21(10):9–14
Kang N (2005) On the area of institutional innovation in higher education resource distribution in a transitional economy. Jiaoyu kexue chubanshe [Educational science publisher], Beijing (in Chinese)
Kang X (2007) Cong jiegou xing yuesu kan dazhonghua jieduan wo guo gaodeng jiaoyu gonggong zhengce de xuanze [A perspective of structural restriction on public policy option in the stage of mass higher education]. Higher Education Studies (China) 2007(2):11–16
Li W (2008) Cong xique zou xiang chongzu: gaodeng jiaoyu de xuqiu yu gongji yanjiu [From scarcity towards adequacy: a study on the demand and supply of higher education]. Educational Science Publishing House, Beijing
Li L (2004) Education for 1.3 billion. Former Chinese vice premier on 10 years of education reform and development. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press and Pearson Education, Beijing
Luo Y (2007) The socialist state and global capital. Educational retrenchment and crisis in China. Chinese Edu Soc 40(1): 9–21
Ministry of Education of China (1998) Mianxiang 21 shiji jiaoyu zhengxing xingdong jihua [Action plan for vitalizing education for the 21st century]. In: Ministry of Education of China (ed.) (1999) Zhongguo jiaoyu nianjian [China education yearbook]. Renmin jiaoyu chubanshe [People’s Education Press], Beijing, p 107–116
Ministry of Education of China (2002). Quan guo jiaoyu shiye dishi ge wunian jihua [The tenth five-year plan for national educational development]. http://www.moe.edu.cn/edoas/website18/level3.jsp?tablename=208&infoid=3336. Accessed 12 Nov 2007
Mok K-H (2005) Globalization and educational restructuring: university merging and changing governance in china. High Educ 50(1):57–88
Mok K-H, Lo YW (2007) The impacts of neo-liberalism on China’s higher education. J Crit Edu Policy Stud 5(1). http://www.jceps.com/?pageID=article&articleID=93, Accessed 29 Sept 2008
State Council of China (1999). Guanyu shenhua jiaoyu gaige, quanmian tuijin suzhi jiaoyu de jueding [Decision on deepening educational reform and pressing ahead quality education in an all-around way]. http://www.moe.edu.cn/edoas/website18/level3.jsp?tablename=208&infoid=3314. Accessed 16 Sep 2001
State Council of China (2010). Guojia zhong chang qi jiaoyu gaige he fazhan guihua gangyao (2010–2020) [National Outline for Medium and Long Term Educational Reform and Development (2010-2020)]. http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2010-07/29/content_1667143.html Accessed 7 Aug 2011
Trow MA (2006) Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access: Forms and phases of higher education in modern societies since WWII. In: Forest JJF, Altbach PG (eds) International handbook of higher education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 243–280
Wan Y (2006) Expansion of Chinese higher education since 1998: Its causes and outcomes, Asia Pacific Edu Rev 17(1): 19–31
Weber M (1994) Sociological writings (Heydebran W (ed)). New York, Continuum
World Bank (1987) China: management and finance of higher education. The World Bank, Washington
Xie Z, Huang R (2005) Research on the macro-regulation model of China’s mainland post-secondary education expansion. High Educ Policy 18(2):145–162
Yang R (2004) Towards massification: higher education development in the People’s Republic of China since 1949. In: Smart JC (ed) Higher education: handbook of theory and research. Kluwer, Armsterdam, pp 311–374
Zhang L, Liu Y (2005) Woguo gaodeng jiaoyu jinru dazhonghua jieduan hou de xitong tezheng fenxi [Analysis on systematic characters of the chinese higher education in the post-massified stage]. Peking Univ Edu Rev 3(4):68–74
Zhao J-H, Song S-H (2008) Wo guo gaodeng xuexiao xuefei biaozhun yu jumin shouru shunping, GDP de zengzhang fenxi [An Analysis of the Relationship between Tuition Fees in Higher Education and the Income of Residents or the Increase of GDP per Person in China], Liaoning shifan daxue xuebao (shehui kexue ban) [J Liaoning Normal Univ (Social Science Edition)] 31(3): 59–61
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zha, Q., Lin, J. (2014). China’s Move to Mass Higher Education: Analyzing the Policy Execution with a “NATO-Scheme”. In: Li, Q., Gerstl-Pepin, C. (eds) Survival of the Fittest. New Frontiers of Educational Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39813-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39813-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39812-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39813-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)