Skip to main content

Measuring Formula-Variable Relevance in Four-Valued Logic by Forgetting

  • Conference paper
Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8041))

  • 2205 Accesses

Abstract

This paper discusses an approach to evaluate the relevance between a formula and a variable in it under the four-valued semantics. In the existing literature, for the classical two-valued propositional logic, there are definitions of whether a variable is independent to a certain formula. These definitions are based on forgetting, which is an operation to maintain and manage knowledge bases. Forgetting has its semantic connections with relevance. In the previous work in which the authors of this paper participated, an approach of quantitatively defining formula-variable relevance in two-valued propositional logic was proposed, which not only gave the judgement of relevant or not, but also gave a measurement of how relevant they are (i.e., the degree of relevance), also using the tool of variable forgetting. In this paper, we adapt the method to four-valued logic. Because forgetting has not been defined in four-valued logic yet, our first step is to define forgetting in four-valued logic. Then we will define formula-variable relevance quantitatively in four-valued logic. It will be a tool for the management of the knowledge bases under four-valued logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belnap Jr., N.D.: A useful four-valued logic. In: Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic, pp. 5–37. Springer (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arieli, O., Avron, A.: The value of the four values. Artificial Intelligence 102(1), 97–141 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Ginsberg, M.L.: Multivalued logics: A uniform approach to reasoning in artificial intelligence. Computational Intelligence 4(3), 265–316 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Priest, G.: Paraconsistent logic. In: Handbook of Philosophical Logic, pp. 287–393. Springer (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bertossi, L., Hunter, A., Schaub, T. (eds.): Inconsistency Tolerance. LNCS, vol. 3300. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lin, F., Reiter, R.: Forget it. Working Notes of AAAI Fall Symposium on Relevance, pp. 154–159 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lang, J., Liberatore, P., Marquis, P.: Propositional independence. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 18, 391–443 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu, D., Lin, Z.: A prime implicates-based formulae forgetting. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering (CSAE), vol. 3, pp. 128–132. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liang, X., Lin, Z., Van den Bussche, J.: Quantitatively evaluating formula-variable relevance by forgetting. In: Zaïane, O.R., Zilles, S. (eds.) Canadian AI 2013. LNCS, vol. 7884, pp. 271–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Lang, J., Marquis, P.: Resolving inconsistencies by variable forgetting. In: International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 239–250. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lang, J., Marquis, P.: Reasoning under inconsistency: A forgetting-based approach. Artificial Intelligence 174(12), 799–823 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, Z., Wang, K., Topor, R., Pan, J.Z.: Forgetting concepts in DL-Lite. In: Bechhofer, S., Hauswirth, M., Hoffmann, J., Koubarakis, M. (eds.) ESWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5021, pp. 245–257. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Eiter, T., Wang, K.: Semantic forgetting in answer set programming. Artificial Intelligence 172(14), 1644–1672 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y.: Knowledge forgetting: Properties and applications. Artificial Intelligence 173(16), 1525–1537 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Liang, X., Lin, Z. (2013). Measuring Formula-Variable Relevance in Four-Valued Logic by Forgetting. In: Wang, M. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8041. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39787-5_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39787-5_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39786-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39787-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics