Rhetorical Challenges and Concerns in Enterprise Content Management

  • Dave ClarkEmail author
Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)


Enterprise Content Management (ECM) can present intriguing new opportunities for organizations’ writers, but it also poses significant challenges to the rhetorical assumptions that underlie how writers design, work, and train. In this chapter, I suggest that designers and implementers of ECM consider the rhetorical changes ECM brings in terms of sales and implementation, component-based writing, and training and development.


Knowledge Management Content Management Technical Communicator Content Management System Content Strategy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Albers, M. (2003). Single sourcing and the technical communication career path. Technical Communication, 50(3), 335–343.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, R. (2007). The rhetoric of enterprise content management (ECM): Confronting the assumptions driving ECM adoption and transforming technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(1), 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen, R. (2009). The diffusion of content management technologies in technical communication work groups: A qualitative study on the activity of technology transfer. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
  4. Association for Information and Image Management (AIIM). (2012). What is enterprise content management? Retrieved August 12, 2012, from
  5. Bacha, J. (2008). Single sourcing and the return to positivism: The threat of plain-style, arhetorical technical communication practices. In B. Gu & G. Pullman (Eds.), Content management: Bridging the gap between theory and practice (pp. 143–159). New York: Baywood.Google Scholar
  6. Brooke, C. G. (2009). Lingua fracta: Toward a rhetoric of new media. Cresskill: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carter, L. (2003). The implications of single sourcing for writers and writing. Technical Communication, 50(3), 317–320.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, D. (2002). Rhetoric of present single-sourcing methodologies. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation. New York, NY.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, D. (2007). Content management and the separation of presentation and content. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(1), 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drucker, P. F. (1972). Concept of the corporation. New York: John Day Co.Google Scholar
  11. Eble, M. (2008). Digital delivery and communication technologies: Understanding content management systems through rhetorical theory. In B. Gu & G. Pullman (Eds.), Content management: Bridging the gap between theory and practice (pp. 87–102). New York: Baywood.Google Scholar
  12. Gee, J. P., Hull, G. A., & Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  13. Giammona, B. (2004). The future of technical communication: How innovation, technology, information management, and other forces are shaping the future of the profession. Technical Communication, 51(3), 349–366.Google Scholar
  14. Gu, B., & Pullman, G. (2008). Introduction: Mapping out the key parameters of content management. In B. Gu & G. Pullman (Eds.), Content management: Bridging the gap between theory and practice (pp. 1–12). New York: Baywood.Google Scholar
  15. Hackos, J. (2002). Content management for dynamic web delivery. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Hackos, J., & Rockley, A. (1999). Single sourcing white paper. Center for Information-Development Management.Google Scholar
  17. Hart-Davidson, W. (2010). Content management: Beyond single sourcing. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Digital literacy for technical communication: 21st century theory and practice (pp. 128–143). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Hart-Davidson, W., Bernhardt, G., McLeod, M., Rife, M., & Grabill, J. (2008). Coming to content management: Inventing infrastructure for organizational knowledge work. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(1), 10–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, C. S., & Fowler, S. (2008). Analyze before you act: CMS and knowledge transfer. In B. Gu & G. Pullman (Eds.), Content management: Bridging the gap between theory and practice (pp. 43–56). New York: Baywood.Google Scholar
  20. Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new: Thinking about electric communication in the late nineteenth century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  22. Pullman, G., & Gu, B. (2007). Guest editors’ introduction: Rationalizing and rhetoricizing content management. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Robidoux, C. (2008). Rhetorically structured content: Developing a collaborative single-sourcing curriculum. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(1), 110–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rockley, A. (2001). The impact of single sourcing and technology. Technical Communication, 48(2), 189–193.Google Scholar
  25. Rockley, A., Kostur, P., & Manning, S. (2002). Managing enterprise content: A unified content strategy. Indianapolis: New Riders.Google Scholar
  26. Sapienza, F. (2004). Usability, structured content, and single sourcing with XML. Technical Communication, 51(3), 399–408.Google Scholar
  27. Sapienza, F. (2007). A rhetorical approach to single-sourcing via intertextuality. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 83–102. Google Scholar
  28. Spinuzzi, C. (2008). Network: Theorizing knowledge work in telecommunications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. vom Brocke, J., Seidel, S., & Simons, A. (2010). Bridging the gap between enterprise content management and creativity: A research framework. In Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Kauai, HI.Google Scholar
  30. Wick, C. (2000). Knowledge management and leadership opportunities for technical communicators. Technical Communication, 47(4), 15–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EnglishUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations